Field Documentation Challenges in Archaeology Question Title * 1. What best describes your current role? CRM archaeologist Academic / research archaeologist Field technician Crew chief / supervisor Lab specialist Student Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. Which tools do you currently use for field documentation? Paper notebook and pen Phone camera Voice memos / audio recorder ArcGIS Field Maps / Collector Trimble, total station, or similar survey equipment Other (please specify) Question Title * 3. Based on your experience, what are the weaknesses of ArcGIS for archaeological fieldwork?(Only answer if you use ArchGIS) Steep learning curve Complex or cluttered interface Slow performance with large datasets Unclear or unhelpful error messages Key features require additional licenses Other (please specify) None of the above Question Title * 4. After reading the description below, what do you see as the potential risks of StitchBot?StitchBot description (for reference):A rugged, hands-free field system that captures voice notes, photos, and GPS data simultaneously to create a single, trusted excavation record. Designed to work offline, reduce post-field data cleanup, and preserve archaeological context from excavation through lab work and museum storytelling. Hardware durability in harsh field conditions Voice capture accuracy in noisy environments Slow adoption in conservative or compliance-driven research settings Need to integrate with existing GIS and museum systems Hardware-based model may complicate scaling or cost recovery Other (please specify) None of the above Question Title * 5. How would StitchBot most likely fit into your workflow? Could replace most paper-based field notes Would significantly reduce documentation and cleanup time Would complement existing tools, not replace them Unlikely to change my current workflow Other (please specify) Question Title * 6. What features, improvements, or add-ons would make StitchBot more useful to you? Done