Skip to content
Field Documentation Challenges in Archaeology
1.
What best describes your current role?
CRM archaeologist
Academic / research archaeologist
Field technician
Crew chief / supervisor
Lab specialist
Student
Other (please specify)
2.
Which tools do you currently use for field documentation?
Paper notebook and pen
Phone camera
Voice memos / audio recorder
ArcGIS Field Maps / Collector
Trimble, total station, or similar survey equipment
Other (please specify)
3.
Based on your experience, what are the weaknesses of ArcGIS for archaeological fieldwork?
(Only answer if you use ArchGIS)
Steep learning curve
Complex or cluttered interface
Slow performance with large datasets
Unclear or unhelpful error messages
Key features require additional licenses
Other (please specify)
None of the above
4.
After reading the description below, what do you see as the potential risks of StitchBot?
StitchBot description (for reference):
A rugged, hands-free field system that captures voice notes, photos, and GPS data simultaneously to create a single, trusted excavation record. Designed to work offline, reduce post-field data cleanup, and preserve archaeological context from excavation through lab work and museum storytelling.
Hardware durability in harsh field conditions
Voice capture accuracy in noisy environments
Slow adoption in conservative or compliance-driven research settings
Need to integrate with existing GIS and museum systems
Hardware-based model may complicate scaling or cost recovery
Other (please specify)
None of the above
5.
How would StitchBot most likely fit into your workflow?
Could replace most paper-based field notes
Would significantly reduce documentation and cleanup time
Would complement existing tools, not replace them
Unlikely to change my current workflow
Other (please specify)
6.
What features, improvements, or add-ons would make StitchBot more useful to you?