Native AOT Survey Question Title * 1. Which of the following languages do you primarily use to complete day to day work? Go C/C++ C# F# Rust Swift Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. What have you done in CoreRT (experimental project)? I have tried compiling a .NET application using CoreRT toolchain I have run an application compiled using CoreRT toolchain successfully I have deployed application compiled using CoreRT toolchain in production I haven't tried CoreRT Other (please specify) Question Title * 3. Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with CoreRT? Extremely satisfied Satisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Dissatisfied Extremely dissatisfied N/A Question Title * 4. What, if anything, do you find frustrating or unappealing about CoreRT? Question Title * 5. Why do you use a native AOT technology? Fast Startup time Building Native libraries Size of the executable Deterministic performance characteristics, No JIT Security, No JIT Obfuscation Less memory consumption Statically link managed and native code into a single binary I don't use a native AOT technology Other (please specify) Question Title * 6. Does the lack of officially supported native AOT option prevent you from using .NET more? I would like to write more projects in .NET, but am not able to due to missing native AOT option I have rewritten .NET projects in a different environment due to missing native AOT option in .NET I am satisfied with the current level of native AOT support I am unhappy with he current level of support, but native AOT is meeting my technical needs I do not use .NET Native AOT support Next
