EVALUATION FORM - BREAKING NEWS FROM ACC.17 Question Title * 1. Please indicate how well the program's learning objectives were met by applying the following scale: Before After Please rate your level of knowledge to examine data from clinical trials and late-breakers presented at ACC.17 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Please rate your level of knowledge to examine data from clinical trials and late-breakers presented at ACC.17 Before menu Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Please rate your level of knowledge to examine data from clinical trials and late-breakers presented at ACC.17 After menu Please rate your level of knowledge to describe how this new data could impact Canadian clinical practice Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Please rate your level of knowledge to describe how this new data could impact Canadian clinical practice Before menu Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Please rate your level of knowledge to describe how this new data could impact Canadian clinical practice After menu Please rate your level of knowledge to evaluate how these studies could lead to new treatments and standards of care Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Please rate your level of knowledge to evaluate how these studies could lead to new treatments and standards of care Before menu Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Please rate your level of knowledge to evaluate how these studies could lead to new treatments and standards of care After menu Question Title * 2. Please indicate whether the information presented by the expert was clear and effective: Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Dr. Shaun Goodman Dr. Shaun Goodman Poor Dr. Shaun Goodman Fair Dr. Shaun Goodman Good Dr. Shaun Goodman Very Good Dr. Shaun Goodman Excellent Dr. Atul Verma Dr. Atul Verma Poor Dr. Atul Verma Fair Dr. Atul Verma Good Dr. Atul Verma Very Good Dr. Atul Verma Excellent Dr. Marc S. Sabatine Dr. Marc S. Sabatine Poor Dr. Marc S. Sabatine Fair Dr. Marc S. Sabatine Good Dr. Marc S. Sabatine Very Good Dr. Marc S. Sabatine Excellent Question Title * 3. Did the presenter make a disclosure statement? Yes No Not sure Dr. Shaun Goodman Dr. Shaun Goodman Yes Dr. Shaun Goodman No Dr. Shaun Goodman Not sure Dr. Atul Verma Dr. Atul Verma Yes Dr. Atul Verma No Dr. Atul Verma Not sure Dr. Marc S. Sabatine Dr. Marc S. Sabatine Yes Dr. Marc S. Sabatine No Dr. Marc S. Sabatine Not sure Question Title * 4. Did you perceive any degree of bias in any part of the presentation? Yes No Dr. Shaun Goodman Dr. Shaun Goodman Yes Dr. Shaun Goodman No If yes, please explain why: Dr. Atul Verma Dr. Atul Verma Yes Dr. Atul Verma No If yes, please explain why: Dr. Marc S. Sabatine Dr. Marc S. Sabatine Yes Dr. Marc S. Sabatine No If yes, please explain why: Question Title * 5. Additional questions:Please indicate your response to the questions below by applying the following scale: Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The program met my educational expectations The program met my educational expectations Strongly Disagree The program met my educational expectations Disagree The program met my educational expectations Neutral The program met my educational expectations Agree The program met my educational expectations Strongly Agree This program allowed adequate time for interaction (minimum 25% of session) This program allowed adequate time for interaction (minimum 25% of session) Strongly Disagree This program allowed adequate time for interaction (minimum 25% of session) Disagree This program allowed adequate time for interaction (minimum 25% of session) Neutral This program allowed adequate time for interaction (minimum 25% of session) Agree This program allowed adequate time for interaction (minimum 25% of session) Strongly Agree The subject was relevant to my practice The subject was relevant to my practice Strongly Disagree The subject was relevant to my practice Disagree The subject was relevant to my practice Neutral The subject was relevant to my practice Agree The subject was relevant to my practice Strongly Agree The overall format was effective for learning The overall format was effective for learning Strongly Disagree The overall format was effective for learning Disagree The overall format was effective for learning Neutral The overall format was effective for learning Agree The overall format was effective for learning Strongly Agree Question Title * 6. From what you have learned, what will you be able to apply to your practice? What potential barriers do you anticipate and how will you overcome them? Key learning that I will apply: Potential barriers and solutions to overcome them: Question Title * 7. Please indicate which topics related to this program and therapeutic area that you would like to hear more about in the future: Question Title * 8. How did you hear about Breaking News from ACC.17 iMedicus? How I found out about this program: My preferred way of receiving communications about programs such as this one (email, fax, hard copy via regular mail, rep driven communications, etc.): Question Title * 9. Did this event adhere to CMA guidelines governing the relationship between physicians and industry? Yes No If no, please explain why: Question Title * 10. Additional comments: Submit