Skip to content

Session Evaluation - Oral Research Presentation - Breakout session 3 | CanSAGE 2023

Breakout session 3:
Oral Research Presentations
 
Speakers: Dr. Marina Ivanova, Dr. Vanessa Rojas-Luengas, Dr. Meghan McGrattan, Dr. Grace Xiaoxi Zhou, Dr. Chelsie Warshafsky, Dr. Pauline Chang
 
Learning objectives:
At the conclusion of this activity, the participant will be able to:
  1. Deliver immediate, constructive feedback on oral research presentations
  2. Share the implications of this research within their own institutions

Conflict of interest disclosure are available in the conference mobile application. 
1.Your name and email (this information will not be shared with anyone)(Required.)
2.Please rate the quality of the session on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).(Required.)
1 - Strongly disagree
2 - Disagree
3 - Neutral
4 - Agree
5 - Strongly agree
Met the stated learning objectives
Enhanced my knowledge
Satisfied my expectations
Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 
Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction
Was free from commercial bias
3.If you perceived any sources of commercial bias, please describe: 
4.What did you learn or how will this educational session impact your practice? (Required.)
5.Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity?(Required.)
6.Please rate the presenter, Dr. Marina Ivanova:(Required.)
1 - Bad
2 - Not bad
3 - Good
4 - Very good
5 - Extremely good
Knowledge
Presentation skills
Topic relevance
7.Please rate the presenter, Dr. Vanessa Rojas-Luengas:(Required.)
1 - Bad
2 - Not bad
3 - Good
4 - Very good
5 - Extremely good
Knowledge
Presentation skills
Topic relevance
8.Please rate the presenter, Dr. Meghan McGrattan:(Required.)
1 - Bad
2 - Not bad
3 - Good
4 - Very good
5 - Extremely good
Knowledge
Presentation skills
Topic relevance
9.Please rate the presenter, Dr. Grace Xiaoxi Zhou:(Required.)
1 - Bad
2 - Not bad
3 - Good
4 - Very good
5 - Extremely good
Knowledge
Presentation skills
Topic relevance
10.Please rate the presenter, Dr. Chelsie Warshafsky:(Required.)
1 - Bad
2 - Not bad
3 - Good
4 - Very good
5 - Extremely good
Knowledge
Presentation skills
Topic relevance
11.Please rate the presenter, Dr. Pauline Chang:(Required.)
1 - Bad
2 - Not bad
3 - Good
4 - Very good
5 - Extremely good
Knowledge
Presentation skills
Topic relevance
12.Please rate the overall session:(Required.)
1 - Bad
2 - Not bad
3 - Good
4 - Very good
5 - Extremely good
Overall
13.Any additional comments?