Feedback about your registration experience and using the API

Question Title

* 1. Rate the experience of accessing the API documentation and finding the details you require to run queries.

Very poor experience

Something wasn't easy or didn't go smoothly

Good user experience, no problems

Question Title

* 2. Rate the experience of setting the query parameters such as area of interest and analysis mode.

Very poor experience

Something wasn't easy or didn't go smoothly

Good user experience, no problems

Question Title

* 3. Which mode of analysis is most valuable to you?

Planning mode, analysis based on four types of vegetation activities

Monitoring mode, analysis based on a start date for action

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 4. Which presentation of habitat condition is most valuable to you?

Time series graph

Percentage change

Hectare change

Mapped (GeoTIFF)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 5. What do you think is the most important information to highlight for a user wanting to use the API?

Question Title

* 6. What do you think a reasonable payment system might be for accessing this information?

no payment, it should be freely available

pay per use

pay per period of use

pay per user base

tiered subscription

Question Title

* 7. Would you recommend this tool - or one like it - to a fellow researcher or industry colleague?

I would not recommend this tool

I'm not sure

I would recommend this tool to others

Question Title

* 8. What is your level of trust of the information provided by the tool? Would anything make it easier to use the tool / more trustworthy?

Question Title

* 9. What additional functionality would you like to see in a tool like this?

We appreciate your time in providing your feedback on the rapid assessment biodiversity tool. Your feedback will be reviewed with others participating in the study and used to improve the tool in the coming months.