Skip to content
Feedback about your registration experience and using the API
1.
Rate the experience of accessing the API documentation and finding the details you require to run queries.
Very poor experience
Something wasn't easy or didn't go smoothly
OK
Good user experience, no problems
2.
Rate the experience of setting the query parameters such as area of interest and analysis mode.
Very poor experience
Something wasn't easy or didn't go smoothly
OK
Good user experience, no problems
3.
Which mode of analysis is most valuable to you?
Planning mode, analysis based on four types of vegetation activities
Monitoring mode, analysis based on a start date for action
Other (please specify)
4.
Which presentation of habitat condition is most valuable to you?
Time series graph
Percentage change
Hectare change
Mapped (GeoTIFF)
Other (please specify)
5.
What do you think is the most important information to highlight for a user wanting to use the API?
6.
What do you think a reasonable payment system might be for accessing this information?
no payment, it should be freely available
pay per use
pay per period of use
pay per user base
tiered subscription
7.
Would you recommend this tool - or one like it - to a fellow researcher or industry colleague?
I would not recommend this tool
I'm not sure
I would recommend this tool to others
8.
What is your level of trust of the information provided by the tool? Would anything make it easier to use the tool / more trustworthy?
9.
What additional functionality would you like to see in a tool like this?
We appreciate your time in providing your feedback on the rapid assessment biodiversity tool. Your feedback will be reviewed with others participating in the study and used to improve the tool in the coming months.
Current Progress,
0 of 9 answered