April 20, 2018 Respirology Grand Rounds Survey

	Strongly Agree	Somewhat Agree	Equivocal	Somewhat Disagree	Strongly Disagree
1. Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation	1. Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Strongly Agree	1. Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Somewhat Agree	1. Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Equivocal	1. Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Somewhat Disagree	1. Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Strongly Disagree
2. Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge	2. Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Strongly Agree	2. Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Somewhat Agree	2. Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Equivocal	2. Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Somewhat Disagree	2. Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Strongly Disagree
3. Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about the topic	3. Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about the topic Strongly Agree	3. Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about the topic Somewhat Agree	3. Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about the topic Equivocal	3. Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about the topic Somewhat Disagree	3. Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about the topic Strongly Disagree
4. Presenter established a good rapport with the audience	4. Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Strongly Agree	4. Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Somewhat Agree	4. Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Equivocal	4. Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Somewhat Disagree	4. Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Strongly Disagree
5. At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning	5. At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Strongly Agree	5. At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Somewhat Agree	5. At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Equivocal	5. At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Somewhat Disagree	5. At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Strongly Disagree
6. Presentation was free of undue commercial influence	6. Presentation was free of undue commercial influence Strongly Agree	6. Presentation was free of undue commercial influence Somewhat Agree	6. Presentation was free of undue commercial influence Equivocal	6. Presentation was free of undue commercial influence Somewhat Disagree	6. Presentation was free of undue commercial influence Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

Somewhat Agree

Equivocal

Somewhat Disagree

Strongly Disagree

1. Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation

1. Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Strongly Agree

1. Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Somewhat Agree

1. Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Equivocal

1. Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Somewhat Disagree

1. Presenter provided objectives or an outline at the beginning of the presentation Strongly Disagree

2. Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge

2. Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Strongly Agree

2. Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Somewhat Agree

2. Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Equivocal

2. Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Somewhat Disagree

2. Presenter provided/facilitated the exchange of relevant knowledge Strongly Disagree

3. Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about the topic

3. Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about the topic Strongly Agree

3. Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about the topic Somewhat Agree

3. Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about the topic Equivocal

3. Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about the topic Somewhat Disagree

3. Presenter stimulated enthusiasm about the topic Strongly Disagree

4. Presenter established a good rapport with the audience

4. Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Strongly Agree

4. Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Somewhat Agree

4. Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Equivocal

4. Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Somewhat Disagree

4. Presenter established a good rapport with the audience Strongly Disagree

5. At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning

5. At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Strongly Agree

5. At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Somewhat Agree

5. At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Equivocal

5. At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Somewhat Disagree

5. At least 25% of the time was allocated to interactive learning Strongly Disagree

6. Presentation was free of undue commercial influence

6. Presentation was free of undue commercial influence Strongly Agree

6. Presentation was free of undue commercial influence Somewhat Agree

6. Presentation was free of undue commercial influence Equivocal

6. Presentation was free of undue commercial influence Somewhat Disagree

6. Presentation was free of undue commercial influence Strongly Disagree

Question Title

* 2. What is your overall evaluation of this presenter?

Outstanding

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Outstanding

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 3. Comments for presenter

What I liked most:

What I learned from this session:

Suggestions for change:

Other comments:

Question Title

* 4. Learner Reflection:

As a result of these rounds, I plan to make changes in my professional activity.

These rounds validate my current knowledge, beliefs and activity.

I need more information before I will change my activity.

These rounds increased my knowledge or awareness of the topic.

These rounds were not relevant to my practice.

Question Title

* 5. The personal learning project (PLP) question I would ask as a result of those rounds would be:

The following questions are optional, but will assist us in continuing to improve the program.

Question Title

* 6. Please choose from the following:

I attended this presentation in person at the host site.

I attended via video conference at a different site.

I viewed the presentation via webcast.

Question Title

* 7. I am a:

Physician

Trainee

Other

Thank you for completing this survey! Your comments will not only provide feedback to the presenters and the planning committee, but also serve to focus your learning and teaching.

April 20, 2018 Respirology Grand Rounds

Dr. Heather McDonald-Blumer: Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis Impact & Implications

Question Title

* 1. Presenter Feedback

Question Title

* 2. What is your overall evaluation of this presenter?

Question Title

* 3. Comments for presenter

Question Title

* 4. Learner Reflection:

Question Title

* 5. The personal learning project (PLP) question I would ask as a result of those rounds would be:

Question Title

* 6. Please choose from the following:

Question Title

* 7. I am a: