1.Rate the Quality of the Translational Research Presentations:

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

Bharath Chandrasekaran, PhD

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

Marshall Chasin, AuD, MSc

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

Matthew Bush, MD, PhD, MBA

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

2.Rate the Quality of Special Session Presentations:

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

Edwin W Rubel, PhD

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

Lisa Cunningham, PhD

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

Suzanne L. Mansour, PhD

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

Will J. McLean, PhD

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

Jonathon Whitton, AuD, PhD

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

Alan C. Foster, PhD

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

Andrew K. Groves, PhD

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

3.To what extent do you feel the following sessions contributed to the overall quality of the scientific meeting?

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

Mentored Student Presentations

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

Early Career Research Award Presentation: Elizabeth A. Walker, PhD, CCC-A/SLP

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

T35 Student Presentations

5: Excellent

4: Very Good

3: Good

2: Fair

1: Poor

Did Not Attend

4.Please provide any suggestions you have for format changes or invited speakers for future meetings:

5.Please provide any suggestions you have for future Carhart Lectures and Lifetime Achievement Awards: