TorontoPMR 2018 - 09:10-09:30 - Regenerative Therapies, PRP and Stem Cells in Musculoskeletal Pain

Regenerative Therapies, PRP and Stem Cells in Musculoskeletal Pain
^{Friday, November 16th 09:10-09:30}
Speakers: Dr. Jihad Abouali, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Michael Garron Hospital, University of Toronto

Description:

Regenerative medicine represents the next wave of MSK medicine and surgery. This presentation will review some of the basic physiology behind platelet-rich plasma and stem cell therapy in the setting of MSK pain and injuries. Techniques of harvesting, preparation, and injections will be reviewed to allow learners to appreciate how these procedures are performed. A critical appraisal of the literature will be summarized to help determine when these treatments have the best clinical outcomes.

Objectives: At the end of the session, the participants will be able to...
-- 1. Describe the physiology of PRP and stem cells
-- 2. Describe techniques of harvesting and preparing PRP and stem cells
-- 3. Describe the current and future roles of regenerative medicine

Question Title

* 1. Please rate the session:

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
The session met my expectations.	The session met my expectations. Strongly Disagree	The session met my expectations. Disagree	The session met my expectations. Neutral	The session met my expectations. Agree	The session met my expectations. Strongly Agree	The session met my expectations. N/A
The audio visuals and related materials were well chosen and of good quality.	The audio visuals and related materials were well chosen and of good quality. Strongly Disagree	The audio visuals and related materials were well chosen and of good quality. Disagree	The audio visuals and related materials were well chosen and of good quality. Neutral	The audio visuals and related materials were well chosen and of good quality. Agree	The audio visuals and related materials were well chosen and of good quality. Strongly Agree	The audio visuals and related materials were well chosen and of good quality. N/A
There was adequate time for questions/discussion and evaluation.	There was adequate time for questions/discussion and evaluation. Strongly Disagree	There was adequate time for questions/discussion and evaluation. Disagree	There was adequate time for questions/discussion and evaluation. Neutral	There was adequate time for questions/discussion and evaluation. Agree	There was adequate time for questions/discussion and evaluation. Strongly Agree	There was adequate time for questions/discussion and evaluation. N/A
I gained new knowledge and skills.	I gained new knowledge and skills. Strongly Disagree	I gained new knowledge and skills. Disagree	I gained new knowledge and skills. Neutral	I gained new knowledge and skills. Agree	I gained new knowledge and skills. Strongly Agree	I gained new knowledge and skills. N/A
The session was free from commercial bias.	The session was free from commercial bias. Strongly Disagree	The session was free from commercial bias. Disagree	The session was free from commercial bias. Neutral	The session was free from commercial bias. Agree	The session was free from commercial bias. Strongly Agree	The session was free from commercial bias. N/A

Question Title

* 2. Please rate the speaker: Jihad Abouali

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree	N/A
The speaker demonstrated thorough knowledge about the topic and established a good rapport with the audience.	The speaker demonstrated thorough knowledge about the topic and established a good rapport with the audience. Strongly Disagree	The speaker demonstrated thorough knowledge about the topic and established a good rapport with the audience. Disagree	The speaker demonstrated thorough knowledge about the topic and established a good rapport with the audience. Neutral	The speaker demonstrated thorough knowledge about the topic and established a good rapport with the audience. Agree	The speaker demonstrated thorough knowledge about the topic and established a good rapport with the audience. Strongly Agree	The speaker demonstrated thorough knowledge about the topic and established a good rapport with the audience. N/A
The objectives were adequately met and the speaker stimulated enthusiasm about the topic.	The objectives were adequately met and the speaker stimulated enthusiasm about the topic. Strongly Disagree	The objectives were adequately met and the speaker stimulated enthusiasm about the topic. Disagree	The objectives were adequately met and the speaker stimulated enthusiasm about the topic. Neutral	The objectives were adequately met and the speaker stimulated enthusiasm about the topic. Agree	The objectives were adequately met and the speaker stimulated enthusiasm about the topic. Strongly Agree	The objectives were adequately met and the speaker stimulated enthusiasm about the topic. N/A
The speaker was well informed, spoke clearly, managed time well and answered questions satisfactorily (an overall assessment is requested).	The speaker was well informed, spoke clearly, managed time well and answered questions satisfactorily (an overall assessment is requested). Strongly Disagree	The speaker was well informed, spoke clearly, managed time well and answered questions satisfactorily (an overall assessment is requested). Disagree	The speaker was well informed, spoke clearly, managed time well and answered questions satisfactorily (an overall assessment is requested). Neutral	The speaker was well informed, spoke clearly, managed time well and answered questions satisfactorily (an overall assessment is requested). Agree	The speaker was well informed, spoke clearly, managed time well and answered questions satisfactorily (an overall assessment is requested). Strongly Agree	The speaker was well informed, spoke clearly, managed time well and answered questions satisfactorily (an overall assessment is requested). N/A
The facilitator was prepared, managed time well and encouraged participation and evaluation.	The facilitator was prepared, managed time well and encouraged participation and evaluation. Strongly Disagree	The facilitator was prepared, managed time well and encouraged participation and evaluation. Disagree	The facilitator was prepared, managed time well and encouraged participation and evaluation. Neutral	The facilitator was prepared, managed time well and encouraged participation and evaluation. Agree	The facilitator was prepared, managed time well and encouraged participation and evaluation. Strongly Agree	The facilitator was prepared, managed time well and encouraged participation and evaluation. N/A

Question Title

* 3. As a result of attending this session I am planning to: (Check all that apply)

a) Discuss the session with my colleagues.

b) Pursue additional learning activities.

c) Complete a Personal Learning Project.

d) Change my practice.
Please explain the change you are planning to make or the learning you plan to complete (if applicable):

Question Title

* 4. Other comments/suggestions/topics for future meetings:

Thank you for taking the time to provide us with your valuable feedback.