Question Title

* 1. Name:

Question Title

* 2. Gender:

Question Title

* 3. Are you an AAS member?

Question Title

* 4. Are you a student or postdoctoral fellow?

Question Title

* 5. Are you a new investigator (<8 years from doctoral degree)?

Question Title

* 6. Are you or have you been involved in research?

Question Title

* 7. Which professional area most accurately represents your interests?

Question Title

* 8. What is your highest educational degree?

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate the SCIENTIFIC CONTENT?

  Outstanding Excellent Good Fair Poor Did Not Attend
Overall meeting
Contributed papers (special sessions)
Contributed papers (podium sessions)
Technology Updates
Poster Sessions

Question Title

* 10. How would you rate the SPECIAL FORUMS?

  Outstanding Excellent Good Fair Poor Did Not Attend
Carhart Lecture
Mentorship Session on the Publishing & Peer Review Process
T35 Session: Using Your Poster to Advance Your Career
Industry Research Consortium Special Session (Virtual Only)

Question Title

* 11. How would you rate the ORGANIZATION?

  Outstanding Excellent Good Fair Poor Did Not Attend
Meeting Place
Podium Sessions
Technology Updates
Audiovisual Services
Hotel Accommodations

Question Title

* 12. How would you rate the OVERALL MEETING CONTENT?

  Outstanding Excellent Good Fair Poor Did Not Attend
Content consistent with publicity
Appropriate level of difficulty at meeting
Activities facilitated learning
I would attend this meeting next year

Question Title

* 13. How would you rate the IMPLEMENTATION?

  Outstanding Excellent Good Fair Poor Did Not Attend
Sufficient advance notice of meeting
Physical facilities conducive to learning
Convenient scheduling (day, time, month)
Sufficient information of meeting content
Adequate time for various presentations

Question Title

* 14. How would you rate the PRESENTATIONS?

  Outstanding Excellent Good Fair Poor Did Not Attend
Teaching aids were appropriate
Presenters used time efficiently
Presenters were prepared & interesting
Presenters' styles conducive to learning
Information presented was useful

Question Title

* 15. How would you rate the SELF-ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING?

  Outstanding Excellent Good Fair Poor Did Not Attend
Interest in hearing related issues increased
Acquired new and/or useful information
Increased my knowledge and/or skills
Will apply knowledge/skills to work
Meeting contributed to professional growth

Question Title

* 16. How I intend to use the information gathered from this meeting:

Question Title

* 17. Identify THREE new concepts learned at this meeting:

Question Title

* 18. Identify one way that your practice will change or be enhanced as a result of attending this meeting:

Question Title

* 19. Do you have any other suggestions or comments regarding the AAS annual meeting?

Question Title

* 20. Students: Would you like to have organized opportunities to meet with other students? Please give suggestions for how you would like to see it achieved.

Question Title

* 21. Would you like to have organized opportunities to meet with researchers? Please give suggestions for how you would like to do this.

Question Title

* 22. Students, post-docs and early investigators: Would you like to have opportunities to learn about career options? Please give suggestions for how you would like to see this achieved.

T