2018 Castellvi Spine

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

MD/DO

ARNP/RN/NP

PT/DPT

AT/OT

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Yes

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Castellvi Spine course course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

	Significantly Met	Somewhat Met	Not Met
Assess and Critique emerging techniques in comparison to current treatment options	Assess and Critique emerging techniques in comparison to current treatment options Significantly Met	Assess and Critique emerging techniques in comparison to current treatment options Somewhat Met	Assess and Critique emerging techniques in comparison to current treatment options Not Met
Discuss adult deformity and complications	Discuss adult deformity and complications Significantly Met	Discuss adult deformity and complications Somewhat Met	Discuss adult deformity and complications Not Met
Understand the use of lumbar techniques in spine surgery	Understand the use of lumbar techniques in spine surgery Significantly Met	Understand the use of lumbar techniques in spine surgery Somewhat Met	Understand the use of lumbar techniques in spine surgery Not Met
Employ useful surgical techniques in total disc replacement surgery	Employ useful surgical techniques in total disc replacement surgery Significantly Met	Employ useful surgical techniques in total disc replacement surgery Somewhat Met	Employ useful surgical techniques in total disc replacement surgery Not Met
Apply decision making strategies to complex cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease procedures	Apply decision making strategies to complex cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease procedures Significantly Met	Apply decision making strategies to complex cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease procedures Somewhat Met	Apply decision making strategies to complex cervical and lumbar degenerative disc disease procedures Not Met

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Significantly Met

Somewhat Met

Not Met

We encourage you to expand on your answer below:

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

This activity validated my current practice; no changes will be made.

Create/revise protcols, policies and/or procedures.

Change the management and/or treatment of my patients.

Other, please specify

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Very Relevant

Relevant

Somewhat Relevant

Not Very Relevant

Irrelevant

Please explain:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION I: SPINE BIOMECHANICS & TECHNOLOGY

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Robots for Reconstruction	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Robots for Reconstruction Excellent	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Robots for Reconstruction Very Good	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Robots for Reconstruction Good	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Robots for Reconstruction Fair	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Robots for Reconstruction Poor
Ira L. Fedder, MD - Understanding the Interspinous Space	Ira L. Fedder, MD - Understanding the Interspinous Space Excellent	Ira L. Fedder, MD - Understanding the Interspinous Space Very Good	Ira L. Fedder, MD - Understanding the Interspinous Space Good	Ira L. Fedder, MD - Understanding the Interspinous Space Fair	Ira L. Fedder, MD - Understanding the Interspinous Space Poor
Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Additive Manufacturing	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Additive Manufacturing Excellent	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Additive Manufacturing Very Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Additive Manufacturing Good	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Additive Manufacturing Fair	Lisa Ferrara, PhD - Additive Manufacturing Poor
Scott A. Webb, DO - Alternative Polymer Materials	Scott A. Webb, DO - Alternative Polymer Materials Excellent	Scott A. Webb, DO - Alternative Polymer Materials Very Good	Scott A. Webb, DO - Alternative Polymer Materials Good	Scott A. Webb, DO - Alternative Polymer Materials Fair	Scott A. Webb, DO - Alternative Polymer Materials Poor
Marc A. Weinstein, MD - Biomechanics of Expandable Interbody Devices	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - Biomechanics of Expandable Interbody Devices Excellent	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - Biomechanics of Expandable Interbody Devices Very Good	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - Biomechanics of Expandable Interbody Devices Good	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - Biomechanics of Expandable Interbody Devices Fair	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - Biomechanics of Expandable Interbody Devices Poor
William C. Welch, MD - Next Generation of Biomaterials	William C. Welch, MD - Next Generation of Biomaterials Excellent	William C. Welch, MD - Next Generation of Biomaterials Very Good	William C. Welch, MD - Next Generation of Biomaterials Good	William C. Welch, MD - Next Generation of Biomaterials Fair	William C. Welch, MD - Next Generation of Biomaterials Poor
Rolando Garcia, Jr., MD - Evidence Based Outcomes for Motion Preservation Devices	Rolando Garcia, Jr., MD - Evidence Based Outcomes for Motion Preservation Devices Excellent	Rolando Garcia, Jr., MD - Evidence Based Outcomes for Motion Preservation Devices Very Good	Rolando Garcia, Jr., MD - Evidence Based Outcomes for Motion Preservation Devices Good	Rolando Garcia, Jr., MD - Evidence Based Outcomes for Motion Preservation Devices Fair	Rolando Garcia, Jr., MD - Evidence Based Outcomes for Motion Preservation Devices Poor
Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - MIS Approaches and the Biomechanics of Stability	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - MIS Approaches and the Biomechanics of Stability Excellent	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - MIS Approaches and the Biomechanics of Stability Very Good	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - MIS Approaches and the Biomechanics of Stability Good	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - MIS Approaches and the Biomechanics of Stability Fair	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - MIS Approaches and the Biomechanics of Stability Poor
Neel Anand, MD - TDR - Where Do We Stand?	Neel Anand, MD - TDR - Where Do We Stand? Excellent	Neel Anand, MD - TDR - Where Do We Stand? Very Good	Neel Anand, MD - TDR - Where Do We Stand? Good	Neel Anand, MD - TDR - Where Do We Stand? Fair	Neel Anand, MD - TDR - Where Do We Stand? Poor

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION II: REGENERATIVE MEDICINE

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Farhan N. Siddiqi, MD - Tissue Engineering	Farhan N. Siddiqi, MD - Tissue Engineering Excellent	Farhan N. Siddiqi, MD - Tissue Engineering Very Good	Farhan N. Siddiqi, MD - Tissue Engineering Good	Farhan N. Siddiqi, MD - Tissue Engineering Fair	Farhan N. Siddiqi, MD - Tissue Engineering Poor
William C. Tally, MD - Stem Cell Disc Regeneration Study	William C. Tally, MD - Stem Cell Disc Regeneration Study Excellent	William C. Tally, MD - Stem Cell Disc Regeneration Study Very Good	William C. Tally, MD - Stem Cell Disc Regeneration Study Good	William C. Tally, MD - Stem Cell Disc Regeneration Study Fair	William C. Tally, MD - Stem Cell Disc Regeneration Study Poor

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION III: Advances is Spinal Technology

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Robert E. Isaacs, MD - PRO - Is the Price of Navigation Worth the Cost of Admission?	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - PRO - Is the Price of Navigation Worth the Cost of Admission? Excellent	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - PRO - Is the Price of Navigation Worth the Cost of Admission? Very Good	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - PRO - Is the Price of Navigation Worth the Cost of Admission? Good	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - PRO - Is the Price of Navigation Worth the Cost of Admission? Fair	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - PRO - Is the Price of Navigation Worth the Cost of Admission? Poor
Marc A. Weinstein, MD - CON - Is the Price of Navigation Worth the Cost of Admission?	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - CON - Is the Price of Navigation Worth the Cost of Admission? Excellent	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - CON - Is the Price of Navigation Worth the Cost of Admission? Very Good	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - CON - Is the Price of Navigation Worth the Cost of Admission? Good	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - CON - Is the Price of Navigation Worth the Cost of Admission? Fair	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - CON - Is the Price of Navigation Worth the Cost of Admission? Poor
Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - PRO - Is Post Expandable Technology Worth It When You Can Just Do and MIS ALIF?	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - PRO - Is Post Expandable Technology Worth It When You Can Just Do and MIS ALIF? Excellent	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - PRO - Is Post Expandable Technology Worth It When You Can Just Do and MIS ALIF? Very Good	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - PRO - Is Post Expandable Technology Worth It When You Can Just Do and MIS ALIF? Good	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - PRO - Is Post Expandable Technology Worth It When You Can Just Do and MIS ALIF? Fair	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - PRO - Is Post Expandable Technology Worth It When You Can Just Do and MIS ALIF? Poor
Neel Anand, MD, Mch - CON - Is Post Expandable Technology Worth It When You Can Just Do and MIS ALIF?	Neel Anand, MD, Mch - CON - Is Post Expandable Technology Worth It When You Can Just Do and MIS ALIF? Excellent	Neel Anand, MD, Mch - CON - Is Post Expandable Technology Worth It When You Can Just Do and MIS ALIF? Very Good	Neel Anand, MD, Mch - CON - Is Post Expandable Technology Worth It When You Can Just Do and MIS ALIF? Good	Neel Anand, MD, Mch - CON - Is Post Expandable Technology Worth It When You Can Just Do and MIS ALIF? Fair	Neel Anand, MD, Mch - CON - Is Post Expandable Technology Worth It When You Can Just Do and MIS ALIF? Poor
Rolando Garcia, Jr., MD - PRO - Is a Lumbar TDR Work vs a Standalone ALIF?	Rolando Garcia, Jr., MD - PRO - Is a Lumbar TDR Work vs a Standalone ALIF? Excellent	Rolando Garcia, Jr., MD - PRO - Is a Lumbar TDR Work vs a Standalone ALIF? Very Good	Rolando Garcia, Jr., MD - PRO - Is a Lumbar TDR Work vs a Standalone ALIF? Good	Rolando Garcia, Jr., MD - PRO - Is a Lumbar TDR Work vs a Standalone ALIF? Fair	Rolando Garcia, Jr., MD - PRO - Is a Lumbar TDR Work vs a Standalone ALIF? Poor
Marc A. Weinstein, MD - CON - Is a Lumbar TDR Work vs a Standalone ALIF?	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - CON - Is a Lumbar TDR Work vs a Standalone ALIF? Excellent	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - CON - Is a Lumbar TDR Work vs a Standalone ALIF? Very Good	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - CON - Is a Lumbar TDR Work vs a Standalone ALIF? Good	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - CON - Is a Lumbar TDR Work vs a Standalone ALIF? Fair	Marc A. Weinstein, MD - CON - Is a Lumbar TDR Work vs a Standalone ALIF? Poor
William C. Welch, MD - PRO - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology?	William C. Welch, MD - PRO - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Excellent	William C. Welch, MD - PRO - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Very Good	William C. Welch, MD - PRO - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Good	William C. Welch, MD - PRO - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Fair	William C. Welch, MD - PRO - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Poor
Robert E. Isaacs, MD - Textured PEEK - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology?	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - Textured PEEK - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Excellent	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - Textured PEEK - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Very Good	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - Textured PEEK - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Good	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - Textured PEEK - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Fair	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - Textured PEEK - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Poor
Boyle Cheng, PhD - 3D Printing - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology?	Boyle Cheng, PhD - 3D Printing - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Excellent	Boyle Cheng, PhD - 3D Printing - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Very Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - 3D Printing - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Good	Boyle Cheng, PhD - 3D Printing - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Fair	Boyle Cheng, PhD - 3D Printing - Is BMP & PEEK Worth It vs Textured PEEK of 3D Printing Technology? Poor
Scott A. Webb, MD - PRO - Post Facet Replacement	Scott A. Webb, MD - PRO - Post Facet Replacement Excellent	Scott A. Webb, MD - PRO - Post Facet Replacement Very Good	Scott A. Webb, MD - PRO - Post Facet Replacement Good	Scott A. Webb, MD - PRO - Post Facet Replacement Fair	Scott A. Webb, MD - PRO - Post Facet Replacement Poor
William C. Welch, MD - CON - Post Facet Replacement	William C. Welch, MD - CON - Post Facet Replacement Excellent	William C. Welch, MD - CON - Post Facet Replacement Very Good	William C. Welch, MD - CON - Post Facet Replacement Good	William C. Welch, MD - CON - Post Facet Replacement Fair	William C. Welch, MD - CON - Post Facet Replacement Poor
Steven J. Tresser, MD - PRO - Robotic Screw Placement vs Fluro	Steven J. Tresser, MD - PRO - Robotic Screw Placement vs Fluro Excellent	Steven J. Tresser, MD - PRO - Robotic Screw Placement vs Fluro Very Good	Steven J. Tresser, MD - PRO - Robotic Screw Placement vs Fluro Good	Steven J. Tresser, MD - PRO - Robotic Screw Placement vs Fluro Fair	Steven J. Tresser, MD - PRO - Robotic Screw Placement vs Fluro Poor
Scott A. Webb, MD - CON - Robotic Screw Placement vs Fluro	Scott A. Webb, MD - CON - Robotic Screw Placement vs Fluro Excellent	Scott A. Webb, MD - CON - Robotic Screw Placement vs Fluro Very Good	Scott A. Webb, MD - CON - Robotic Screw Placement vs Fluro Good	Scott A. Webb, MD - CON - Robotic Screw Placement vs Fluro Fair	Scott A. Webb, MD - CON - Robotic Screw Placement vs Fluro Poor

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION IV: Complications & Solutions

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Anders Cohen, DO - L5S1 ALIF Pseudo	Anders Cohen, DO - L5S1 ALIF Pseudo Excellent	Anders Cohen, DO - L5S1 ALIF Pseudo Very Good	Anders Cohen, DO - L5S1 ALIF Pseudo Good	Anders Cohen, DO - L5S1 ALIF Pseudo Fair	Anders Cohen, DO - L5S1 ALIF Pseudo Poor
William C. Welch, MD - Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks	William C. Welch, MD - Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks Excellent	William C. Welch, MD - Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks Very Good	William C. Welch, MD - Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks Good	William C. Welch, MD - Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks Fair	William C. Welch, MD - Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks Poor
Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - Proximal Junctional Kyphosis	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Excellent	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Very Good	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Good	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Fair	Joseph M. Zavatsky, MD - Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Poor
John M. Small, MD - Flat Back Deformity	John M. Small, MD - Flat Back Deformity Excellent	John M. Small, MD - Flat Back Deformity Very Good	John M. Small, MD - Flat Back Deformity Good	John M. Small, MD - Flat Back Deformity Fair	John M. Small, MD - Flat Back Deformity Poor
Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD - Infected Hardware	Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD - Infected Hardware Excellent	Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD - Infected Hardware Very Good	Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD - Infected Hardware Good	Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD - Infected Hardware Fair	Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD - Infected Hardware Poor
Ryan D. Murtagh, MD - Not Understanding Situational Awareness	Ryan D. Murtagh, MD - Not Understanding Situational Awareness Excellent	Ryan D. Murtagh, MD - Not Understanding Situational Awareness Very Good	Ryan D. Murtagh, MD - Not Understanding Situational Awareness Good	Ryan D. Murtagh, MD - Not Understanding Situational Awareness Fair	Ryan D. Murtagh, MD - Not Understanding Situational Awareness Poor
Reginald J. Davis, MD, FACS - Managing Complications in Outpatient Surgery C&R	Reginald J. Davis, MD, FACS - Managing Complications in Outpatient Surgery C&R Excellent	Reginald J. Davis, MD, FACS - Managing Complications in Outpatient Surgery C&R Very Good	Reginald J. Davis, MD, FACS - Managing Complications in Outpatient Surgery C&R Good	Reginald J. Davis, MD, FACS - Managing Complications in Outpatient Surgery C&R Fair	Reginald J. Davis, MD, FACS - Managing Complications in Outpatient Surgery C&R Poor
Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Navigation Complications & Solutions	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Navigation Complications & Solutions Excellent	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Navigation Complications & Solutions Very Good	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Navigation Complications & Solutions Good	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Navigation Complications & Solutions Fair	Alejandro Castellvi, MD - Navigation Complications & Solutions Poor
Don Moore, MD - C5 Nerve Palsy	Don Moore, MD - C5 Nerve Palsy Excellent	Don Moore, MD - C5 Nerve Palsy Very Good	Don Moore, MD - C5 Nerve Palsy Good	Don Moore, MD - C5 Nerve Palsy Fair	Don Moore, MD - C5 Nerve Palsy Poor

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION V: Advances in Spinal Technology

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Don Moore, MD - Pseudarthrosis Post Cervical Surgery	Don Moore, MD - Pseudarthrosis Post Cervical Surgery Excellent	Don Moore, MD - Pseudarthrosis Post Cervical Surgery Very Good	Don Moore, MD - Pseudarthrosis Post Cervical Surgery Good	Don Moore, MD - Pseudarthrosis Post Cervical Surgery Fair	Don Moore, MD - Pseudarthrosis Post Cervical Surgery Poor
Jacob Januszewski, DO - Cervical Complications Following Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis with Cervical Myelopathy	Jacob Januszewski, DO - Cervical Complications Following Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis with Cervical Myelopathy Excellent	Jacob Januszewski, DO - Cervical Complications Following Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis with Cervical Myelopathy Very Good	Jacob Januszewski, DO - Cervical Complications Following Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis with Cervical Myelopathy Good	Jacob Januszewski, DO - Cervical Complications Following Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis with Cervical Myelopathy Fair	Jacob Januszewski, DO - Cervical Complications Following Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis with Cervical Myelopathy Poor
Steven J. Tresser, MD - Risk Factors of Postop Neurologic Decline in Spinal Deformity Surgery	Steven J. Tresser, MD - Risk Factors of Postop Neurologic Decline in Spinal Deformity Surgery Excellent	Steven J. Tresser, MD - Risk Factors of Postop Neurologic Decline in Spinal Deformity Surgery Very Good	Steven J. Tresser, MD - Risk Factors of Postop Neurologic Decline in Spinal Deformity Surgery Good	Steven J. Tresser, MD - Risk Factors of Postop Neurologic Decline in Spinal Deformity Surgery Fair	Steven J. Tresser, MD - Risk Factors of Postop Neurologic Decline in Spinal Deformity Surgery Poor
William C. Tally, MD - DVT Post Surgery	William C. Tally, MD - DVT Post Surgery Excellent	William C. Tally, MD - DVT Post Surgery Very Good	William C. Tally, MD - DVT Post Surgery Good	William C. Tally, MD - DVT Post Surgery Fair	William C. Tally, MD - DVT Post Surgery Poor
Devin K. Datta, MD - Complications of Tranexamic Acid	Devin K. Datta, MD - Complications of Tranexamic Acid Excellent	Devin K. Datta, MD - Complications of Tranexamic Acid Very Good	Devin K. Datta, MD - Complications of Tranexamic Acid Good	Devin K. Datta, MD - Complications of Tranexamic Acid Fair	Devin K. Datta, MD - Complications of Tranexamic Acid Poor
John M. Small, MD - Outcomes of Complications in Elderly Patients	John M. Small, MD - Outcomes of Complications in Elderly Patients Excellent	John M. Small, MD - Outcomes of Complications in Elderly Patients Very Good	John M. Small, MD - Outcomes of Complications in Elderly Patients Good	John M. Small, MD - Outcomes of Complications in Elderly Patients Fair	John M. Small, MD - Outcomes of Complications in Elderly Patients Poor
Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD - Epidural Hematoma	Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD - Epidural Hematoma Excellent	Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD - Epidural Hematoma Very Good	Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD - Epidural Hematoma Good	Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD - Epidural Hematoma Fair	Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD - Epidural Hematoma Poor
Ira L. Fedder, MD - Complication Spinal Fixation & Osteoporosis	Ira L. Fedder, MD - Complication Spinal Fixation & Osteoporosis Excellent	Ira L. Fedder, MD - Complication Spinal Fixation & Osteoporosis Very Good	Ira L. Fedder, MD - Complication Spinal Fixation & Osteoporosis Good	Ira L. Fedder, MD - Complication Spinal Fixation & Osteoporosis Fair	Ira L. Fedder, MD - Complication Spinal Fixation & Osteoporosis Poor

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION VI: The State of Spine

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Robin Young, CFA - State of the Spine Market	Robin Young, CFA - State of the Spine Market Excellent	Robin Young, CFA - State of the Spine Market Very Good	Robin Young, CFA - State of the Spine Market Good	Robin Young, CFA - State of the Spine Market Fair	Robin Young, CFA - State of the Spine Market Poor
Lt. General William Welser - KEYNOTE: HONOR FLIGHT	Lt. General William Welser - KEYNOTE: HONOR FLIGHT Excellent	Lt. General William Welser - KEYNOTE: HONOR FLIGHT Very Good	Lt. General William Welser - KEYNOTE: HONOR FLIGHT Good	Lt. General William Welser - KEYNOTE: HONOR FLIGHT Fair	Lt. General William Welser - KEYNOTE: HONOR FLIGHT Poor
Farhan N. Siddiqi, MD - Outpatient Surgery in the Present Time	Farhan N. Siddiqi, MD - Outpatient Surgery in the Present Time Excellent	Farhan N. Siddiqi, MD - Outpatient Surgery in the Present Time Very Good	Farhan N. Siddiqi, MD - Outpatient Surgery in the Present Time Good	Farhan N. Siddiqi, MD - Outpatient Surgery in the Present Time Fair	Farhan N. Siddiqi, MD - Outpatient Surgery in the Present Time Poor
Reginald J. Davis, MD, FACS - Outpatient Surgery in the Near Future	Reginald J. Davis, MD, FACS - Outpatient Surgery in the Near Future Excellent	Reginald J. Davis, MD, FACS - Outpatient Surgery in the Near Future Very Good	Reginald J. Davis, MD, FACS - Outpatient Surgery in the Near Future Good	Reginald J. Davis, MD, FACS - Outpatient Surgery in the Near Future Fair	Reginald J. Davis, MD, FACS - Outpatient Surgery in the Near Future Poor
Jacob Januszewski, DO - Cervical Deformity	Jacob Januszewski, DO - Cervical Deformity Excellent	Jacob Januszewski, DO - Cervical Deformity Very Good	Jacob Januszewski, DO - Cervical Deformity Good	Jacob Januszewski, DO - Cervical Deformity Fair	Jacob Januszewski, DO - Cervical Deformity Poor

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Atlanta Trauma Symposium speakers
SESSION VII: Games Changers in Spine Surgery

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Devin K. Datta, MD - Why is There Increasing Pseudarthrosis in Multilevel ACDF?	Devin K. Datta, MD - Why is There Increasing Pseudarthrosis in Multilevel ACDF? Excellent	Devin K. Datta, MD - Why is There Increasing Pseudarthrosis in Multilevel ACDF? Very Good	Devin K. Datta, MD - Why is There Increasing Pseudarthrosis in Multilevel ACDF? Good	Devin K. Datta, MD - Why is There Increasing Pseudarthrosis in Multilevel ACDF? Fair	Devin K. Datta, MD - Why is There Increasing Pseudarthrosis in Multilevel ACDF? Poor
Robert E. Isaacs, MD - Real Time Intraoperative Spinal Balance Correction	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - Real Time Intraoperative Spinal Balance Correction Excellent	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - Real Time Intraoperative Spinal Balance Correction Very Good	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - Real Time Intraoperative Spinal Balance Correction Good	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - Real Time Intraoperative Spinal Balance Correction Fair	Robert E. Isaacs, MD - Real Time Intraoperative Spinal Balance Correction Poor

Question Title

* 17. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 18. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 19. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 20. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Direct Mail

Eblast

Phone Call

Course Catalog

Orthopedics Today/Orthopedics Ad

Social Media (Facebook/Twitter)

Referral (Please list below)

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 21. Please provide your contact information.

Full Name:

Degree:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Question Title

* 22. PHYSICIANS: The Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education (FORE) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
FORE designates this live activity for a maximum of 14.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Please attest to the total number of credit hours (minimum .25- maximum 14.5) that you spent in this CME
activity:

Question Title

* 1. Check appropriate title.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the organization of this meeting.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest. Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

Question Title

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support? (One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the quality of the meeting facilities.

Question Title

* 6. How well were the Castellvi Spine course course objectives met?Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

Question Title

* 7. Did you meet your personal goal/objective for what you intended to get out of this course?

Question Title

* 8. Do you intend to integrate what you learned at this conference into your current practice?

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the relevance of this program to your scope of practice:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION I: SPINE BIOMECHANICS & TECHNOLOGY

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION II: REGENERATIVE MEDICINE

Question Title

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION III: Advances is Spinal Technology

Question Title

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION IV: Complications & Solutions

Question Title

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION V: Advances in Spinal Technology

Question Title

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakersSESSION VI: The State of Spine

Question Title

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Atlanta Trauma Symposium speakersSESSION VII: Games Changers in Spine Surgery

Question Title

* 17. Based on your CME needs, please give suggestions for future program topics/formats.

Question Title

* 18. What barriers do you foresee that may hinder your implementation of changes learned at this activity? What educational strategies could help to overcome these barriers?

Question Title

* 19. What do you see as your BIGGEST challenge in improving patient safety, patient care and/or patient outcomes? What educational strategies could help to overcome this challenge?

Question Title

* 20. How did you hear about this CME Program?

Question Title

* 21. Please provide your contact information.

Question Title

* 3. The ACCME defines commercial bias as presentations giving an unbalanced view of therapeutic options by promoting a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.

Was this CME course free of commercial bias?

* 4. Did the faculty disclose significant relationships with commercial support?
(One or more of these methods: Syllabus / Opening Remarks / Verbally / On Slides)

* 6. How well were the Castellvi Spine course course objectives met?

Upon completion of the course participants should be able to:

* 10. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION I: SPINE BIOMECHANICS & TECHNOLOGY

* 11. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION II: REGENERATIVE MEDICINE

* 12. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION III: Advances is Spinal Technology

* 13. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION IV: Complications & Solutions

* 14. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION V: Advances in Spinal Technology

* 15. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Castellvi Spine speakers
SESSION VI: The State of Spine

* 16. Please rate the OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS of each of our Atlanta Trauma Symposium speakers
SESSION VII: Games Changers in Spine Surgery