Sample Webinar Proposal Rating Survey (copied from FMHCA 2019 lineup)

1.Please enter your name: 
2.Rate how interesting you think each webinar proposal is
Uninteresting
A little interesting
Moderately interesting
Very interesting
Extremely Interesting
#1 (Gonzalez)
#2 (Reid)
#3 (Ritfield)
#4 (Filippo)
#5 (Waugh)
#6 (Giuliana)
#7 (Riazati)
#8 (Norton)
#9 (Siegel)
#10 (Wright)
#11 (Champion)
#12 (Rossen)
#13 (Davis)
#14 (Messina)
#15 (Basulto)
#16 (Kvols)
#17 (Erwin)
#18 (Lauridsen)
#19 (Darville)
#20 (Mattick)
#21 (Manigat)
#22 (Martinez)
#23 (Evans)
#24 (Javete)
#25 (Fox)
3.Rate how relevant you think each webinar proposal is for FMHCA members
Irrelevant
A little Relevant
Moderately Relevant
Very Relevant
Extremely Relevant
#1 (Gonzalez)
#2 (Reid)
#3 (Ritfield)
#4 (Filippo)
#5 (Waugh)
#6 (Giuliana)
#7 (Riazati)
#8 (Norton)
#9 (Siegel)
#10 (Wright)
#11 (Champion)
#12 (Rossen)
#13 (Davis)
#14 (Messina)
#15 (Basulto)
#16 (Kvols)
#17 (Erwin)
#18 (Lauridsen)
#19 (Darville)
#20 (Mattick)
#21 (Manigat)
#22 (Martinez)
#23 (Evans)
#24 (Javete)
#25 (Fox)
4.Please indicate whether you have any concerns (i.e., unethical content, inconsistent with counseling values, poor reflection on FMHCA) about the webinar's content.  If so, describe those concerns in the "other" text box.
Concerns
#1 (Gonzalez)
#2 (Reid)
#3 (Ritfield)
#4 (Filippo)
#5 (Waugh)
#6 (Giuliana)
#7 (Riazati)
#8 (Norton)
#9 (Siegel)
#10 (Wright)
#11 (Champion)
#12 (Rossen)
#13 (Davis)
#14 (Messina)
#15 (Basulto)
#16 (Kvols)
#17 (Erwin)
#18 (Lauridsen)
#19 (Darville)
#20 (Mattick)
#21 (Manigat)
#22 (Martinez)
#23 (Evans)
#24 (Javete)
#25 (Fox)
Current Progress,
0 of 4 answered