TICP YEAR 4 2009-2010 Candidate Evaluation of Instructor 1. Default Section Question Title * 1. Please identify yourself: Linda Attoe Colleen Flood Katherine Harper John Iddiols Chris McIntosh Hilary Offman David Robertson Question Title * 2. Please indicate which TICP Year 4 2009 - 2010 Course you are evaluating: September 14 - Oct 19 ,2009: Neo-Kleinian Thought / Cont Case 1.1 October 5, 2009: Neo-Kleinian Thought / Cont Case 1.3 October 19, 2009: Neo-Kleinian Thought / Cont Case 1.4 October 26, 2009: Freudian and French Ucs / Cont Case 2.1 November 2, 2009: Freudian and Frenc Ucs / Cont Case 2.2 November 9, 2009: Kleinian Ucs / Cont Case 2.3 November 16, 2009: Self Psych Ucs / Cont Case 2.4 November 23, 2009: Relational Ucs / Cont Case 2.5 November 30, 2009: Procedural Ucs / Cont Case 3.1 December 7, 2009: Aggression / Cont Case 3.2 December 14, 2009: Aggression / Cont Case 3.3 Remarks Question Title * 3. Please indicate which TICP Instructor you are evaluating: Dr. Brent Willock Dr. Bruce Herzog Dr. Donald Carveth Dr. Gail White Dr. Gary Taerk Dr. Judith Levene Dr. Marsha Hewitt Dr. Rex Kay Dr. Ron Ruskin Remarks Question Title * 4. Please evaluate the seminar / instructor you have indicated above by using the following rating system: Poor Fair Good Excellent Usefulness of clinical material Usefulness of clinical material Poor Usefulness of clinical material Fair Usefulness of clinical material Good Usefulness of clinical material Excellent Clinical applications of material Clinical applications of material Poor Clinical applications of material Fair Clinical applications of material Good Clinical applications of material Excellent Usefulness of discussion Usefulness of discussion Poor Usefulness of discussion Fair Usefulness of discussion Good Usefulness of discussion Excellent Encouragement / facilitation of candidate participation Encouragement / facilitation of candidate participation Poor Encouragement / facilitation of candidate participation Fair Encouragement / facilitation of candidate participation Good Encouragement / facilitation of candidate participation Excellent Comparative / Integrative Focus Comparative / Integrative Focus Poor Comparative / Integrative Focus Fair Comparative / Integrative Focus Good Comparative / Integrative Focus Excellent Readings Readings Poor Readings Fair Readings Good Readings Excellent Organzation Organzation Poor Organzation Fair Organzation Good Organzation Excellent Clarity Clarity Poor Clarity Fair Clarity Good Clarity Excellent Remarks Thank you for your participation! Done