Question Title

* 1. Do you support mixing the Amateurs and Non-Pro's into a single class?

Question Title

* 2. Do you like (support) the new $350k/$150k proposal as described?

Question Title

* 3. If you did not answer YES to the above, would you support the current $350k/$150k proposal if it was limited to Amateur riders only?

Question Title

* 4. The current Unlimited Amateur Earnings are based on "NP Limited Aged Event Earnings."  Do you support a change to the current Unlimited Amateur Earnings Cap based on the existing rules?  If so, how much would you like to see it raised?

Question Title

* 5. Would you like to see the Unlimited Amateur Earnings Rule simplified and based on a person's "Lifetime Earnings" rather than their "NP Limited Aged Event Earnings?"

Question Title

* 6. If you answered YES to Question 5, what limit would you like to see in the Unlimited Amateur if it were based on a person's Lifetime Earnings?

Question Title

* 7. Under the current Unlimited Amateur rules, after achieving a certain level of earnings an Amateur must choose to stay in the UA or move onto the NP, they are not allowed to show in both.  Do you agree with forcing riders to choose between the NP and Amateur?

Question Title

* 8. The new $350k/$150k class, you must enter the $350 in order to ride in the $150 as it is a class within a class.  Do you like this class structure or would you rather have the option of entering either one or both?

Question Title

* 9. The PCCHA Board of Directors is working for you, our membership and community.  Please take a minute and think about what you would like to tell us.  We would like to hear any feedback that you can provide.  It is important, as we are working to build a strong and fun association.   Your Comments?

Question Title

* 10. Finally...tell us about your competition level within the Limited Aged Events.

T