Skip to content
RedZone 2026 Rule Change Survey
1.
Should forcing a 3-and-out be worth 0.5 points for a DST?
Yes
No
2.
Shall Points For be used for all Tie Breakers (currently H2H is the first Tie Breaker for Tied Teams)?
Yes
No
3.
Should "blatant impeding" of other teams be allowed? This would include using Sleeper roster locking features as an advantage.
Yes
No
4.
Shall RedZone implement a Two-Week Scramble for Fifth Place to ensure complacency is never an option?
Outcome: First-round playoff losers will have a two-week matchup to identify who gets fifth place and who is the biggest loser of the playoffs.
Yes
No
5.
Should RedZone implement the following rule?
The winner of the Rejects Rumble is allowed to create a brand new rule completely of their choosing solely for the following season. This cannot go into effect during the playoffs, and it cannot specifically target one or more pre-identified owners. Example: A rule affecting the first-place team in Week Ten would be allowed, but a rule affecting NSA in Week Ten would not be allowed. This is the *only* constraint, and any possible outcomes would otherwise be allowed for this new creative rule.
Yes
No
6.
Shall the above rule be implemented for the 2026 Season immediately? If so, 302 Cadets would get to make the rule.
Yes
No
7.
Should we change the winnings calculation to the proposed payout?
Recalculate how winnings are distributed. $200 to first place, $100 to second place, $50 to third place, and an additional $50 to the highest points scored in the regular season. No small payouts for just making the playoffs, and keep $100 in the Empire pot as it currently is.
Yes
No
8.
New Rule Proposal:
I will immediately implement a new survey with the questions.