1.School District/Charter Network

2.Per Education Code (EC) Section 53008, which Reading Difficulties Risk Screener did your district adopt? https://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cl/

Amplify mClass with / DIBELS 8

Amira

UCSF Multitudes

ROAR

Other (please specify)

3.What stage of implementation is your district currently in?

Preparing to screen

Completed one screening window

Completed two or more screening windows

Pilot only (not fully implemented)

4.When during the school year is your district administering the screener?

5.For which grades is universal screening being implemented this year?

Kindergarten

1st Grade

2nd Grade

Additional grades (specify)

6.Approximately how many and what percentage of K-2 students in your district have been screened?

7.Approximately how many and what percentage of K-2 students screened were flagged as "at risk" for reading difficulties?

8.How would your district rate your first reading difficulties risk screening experience overall?

Very successful

Somewhat successful

Neutral

Some challenges

Significant challenges

9.Elaborate below

10.Did your district observe any unexpected trends in your screening data? (grade-level differences, EL vs. non-EL, higher/lower than expected risk rates)

Yes

No

11.If yes, specify

12.What year was your last local ELA/ELD instructional materials adoption?

13.Which ELA/ELD curriculum is currently implemented in your district?

14.Please select all areas in which your district would benefit from additional support from the California Department of Education (CDE)

Implementation guidance

Screener training support/professional development

Data interpretation and reporting

Funding/resources

Technical assistance

Other (please specify)

15.Do you have an existing process for sharing anonymized screening data? (advocacy partners, state leaders, community organizations, COEs, etc)

Yes

No

In development

16.If yes, briefly describe and/or share access link

17.Would your district be open to sharing anonymized data with the EdVoice Institute for research purposes?

Yes

No

Possibly

18.Best contact information for any data-related correspondence (name, position, email)