Skip to content
Check Screen Reader Mode to make this survey compatible with screen readers.
Check Screen Reader Mode to make this survey compatible with screen readers.
Student Evaluation of Dissertation Panel
We would greatly appreciate your completion of this survey. It is important for us to understand your dissertation experience. This information may be used to make important decisions, such as which faculty serve on dissertation panels and which faculty work together on panels. Your responses will in no way affect your relationship with ICSW. Please provide a response to each question.
1.
On what date did you defend your dissertation? (give approximate date if not 100% sure):
Date / Time
Date
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
Su
Sunday
Mo
Monday
Tu
Tuesday
We
Wednesday
Th
Thursday
Fr
Friday
Sa
Saturday
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
*
2.
What was the Methodology you used for your dissertation?
(Required.)
Qualitative: Phenomenology: IPA
Qualitative: Phenomenology: Case Study
Qualitative: Ethnography
Qualitative: Narrative
Qualitative: Grounded Theory
Quantitative: Survey Research
Quantitative: Experimental Research
Mixed Methods
Other (please specify)
*
3.
Name of your Dissertation Chair
(Required.)
*
4.
Name of your Committee Member 1
(Required.)
*
5.
Name of your Committee Member 2
(Required.)
*
6.
The committee member(s) was knowledgable about my topic
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Dissertation Chair
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Committee Member 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Committee Member 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
*
7.
The committee member(s) helped to improve the quality of my study
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Dissertation Chair
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
*
8.
The committee member(s) effectively guided me as a researcher
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Dissertation Chair
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Committee Member 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Committee Member 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
*
9.
The committee member(s) helped create a culture for learning / fostering growth (for example - trust, respect, engagement, flexibility, enthusiasm)
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Dissertation Chair
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
*
10.
The committee member(s) encouraged autonomy while providing guidance.
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Dissertation Chair
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
*
11.
The committee member(s) provided specific feedback to guide my learning.
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Dissertation Chair
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
*
12.
The committee member(s) provided feedback in a timely manner.
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Dissertation Chair
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
*
13.
The committee member(s) was congenial and worked well together.
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Dissertation Chair
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
*
14.
The committee member(s) kept appointments.
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Dissertation Chair
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
*
15.
The expectations of the committee member(s) were clear (for example - verbal discussion, written report).
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Dissertation Chair
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Committee Member 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
*
16.
In regard to scholarship,(i.e stylistic and organization rigor; conceptual clarity, articulation of objectives, evidence) , the committee member(s) maintained:
(Required.)
High Standards
Somewhat High Standards
Somewhat Low Standards
Low Standards
Dissertation Chair
High Standards
Somewhat High Standards
Somewhat Low Standards
Low Standards
Committee Member 1
High Standards
Somewhat High Standards
Somewhat Low Standards
Low Standards
Committee Member 2
High Standards
Somewhat High Standards
Somewhat Low Standards
Low Standards
*
17.
As part of our new process, students, their Dissertation Chair and select panel members attend a planning committee meeting prior to the Proposal Hearing. How do you rate the effectiveness of this meeting? If your chair did not convene a planning committee meeting, select NA.
(Required.)
Extremely helpful
Very helpful
Somewhat helpful
Not so helpful
Not at all helpful
NA - I did not participate in a planning committee meeting
*
18.
The committee(s) member helped to prepare me for the proposal hearing.
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Dissertation Chair
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Committee Member 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Committee Member 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
*
19.
The committee member(s) helped to prepare me for the dissertation defense.
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Dissertation Chair
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Committee Member 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Committee Member 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
*
20.
Overall, I rate the committee member(s) as
(Required.)
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Dissertation Chair
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Committee Member 1
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Committee Member 2
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
21.
Which aspects of this process with the Dissertation Chair were most valuable to your overall learning experience?
22.
Which aspects of this process with Committee Member 1 were most valuable to your overall learning experience?
23.
Which aspects of this process with Committee Member 2 were most valuable to your overall learning experience?
*
24.
Name of Reader 1
(Required.)
*
25.
Name of Reader 2 (assigned)
(Required.)
*
26.
The Reader(s) helped to improve the quality of my study
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Reader 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Reader 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
*
27.
The Reader(s) provided specific feedback to guide my learning
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Reader 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
Reader 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
*
28.
The Reader(s) provided useful feedback for my dissertation proposal draft (chapters 1-3).
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Reader 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Reader 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
*
29.
The Reader(s) provided useful feedback for my final 3 chapters (Chapters 4-6).
(Required.)
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Reader 1
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
Reader 2
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
30.
In regard to scholarship,(i.e stylistic and organization rigor; conceptual clarity, articulation of objectives, evidence) , the reader(s)maintained:
High Standards
Somewhat High Standards
Somewhat Low Standards
Low Standards
Reader 1
High Standards
Somewhat High Standards
Somewhat Low Standards
Low Standards
Reader 2
High Standards
Somewhat High Standards
Somewhat Low Standards
Low Standards
*
31.
Regarding my Proposal Hearing, the reader(s):
(Required.)
Attended my Proposal Hearing in person
Attended my Proposal Hearing via video conference
Did not attend my Proposal Hearing
Reader 1
Attended my Proposal Hearing in person
Attended my Proposal Hearing via video conference
Did not attend my Proposal Hearing
Reader 2
Attended my Proposal Hearing in person
Attended my Proposal Hearing via video conference
Did not attend my Proposal Hearing
*
32.
Regarding my Dissertation Defense, the reader(s):
(Required.)
Attended my Dissertation Defense in person
Attended my Dissertation Defense via video conference
Did not attend my Dissertation Defense
Reader 1
Attended my Dissertation Defense in person
Attended my Dissertation Defense via video conference
Did not attend my Dissertation Defense
Reader 2
Attended my Dissertation Defense in person
Attended my Dissertation Defense via video conference
Did not attend my Dissertation Defense
*
33.
Overall, I rate this reader(s) as
(Required.)
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Reader 1
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Reader 2
Poor
Adequate
Good
Excellent
34.
Which aspects of this process with Reader 1 were most valuable to your overall learning experience?
35.
Which aspects of this process with Reader 2 were most valuable to your overall learning experience?
36.
What overall changes/improvements would you recommend based on your dissertation process?
Current Progress,
0 of 36 answered