A. Webb Roberts Center for Continuing Medical Internal Medicine Review Day 2 Evaluation Tuesday 7/16/2019 Question Title * 1. Title MD DO Resident DPM PA Nurse Practitioner Other Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. To help us evaluate the successfulness of our educational activity, please list changes you intend to make in your current role as a result of attending this activity:(i.e., Change/improve strategies for treatment of pulmonary patients based on evidence presented) 1 2 Question Title * 3. Was the content free of bias? Yes No If you selected No, please indicate bias perceived during this presentation. Question Title * 4. Faculty Evaluation:Trends in Preventative Medicine and Screening - Lisa Forrester, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 5. Faculty Evaluation:*Physician Burnout and Stress - A smoldering Pandemic (Ethics) - Dawn Sears, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 6. Faculty Evaluation:Herbal Supplements and Integrative Medicine in 2019- Lisa Forrester, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 7. Faculty Evaluation:Gluten Issues - Dawn Sears, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 8. Faculty Evaluation:Wearable Devices and New Patient Tech in Healthcare - Robert "Jay" Widmer, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 9. Faculty Evaluation:Cardiovascular Benefits of Newer Diabetic Medications - Mike McNeal, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 10. Faculty Evaluation:Anti-platelet Therapy in the Heart Patient - Robert "Jay" Widmer, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 11. Faculty Evaluation:*Tips for Improving Your Communication with Your Patients (Ethics) - Tresa McNeal, MD, FACP (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent Comment: Question Title * 12. Faculty Evaluation:General Cardiology for Primary Care Physicians : A Case-Based Presentation - Robert "Jay" Widmer, MD (1) Poor (2) (3) (4) (5) Excellent Clarity & Organization Clarity & Organization (1) Poor Clarity & Organization (2) Clarity & Organization (3) Clarity & Organization (4) Clarity & Organization (5) Excellent Expertise of the Faculty Expertise of the Faculty (1) Poor Expertise of the Faculty (2) Expertise of the Faculty (3) Expertise of the Faculty (4) Expertise of the Faculty (5) Excellent Teaching Strategies were effective Teaching Strategies were effective (1) Poor Teaching Strategies were effective (2) Teaching Strategies were effective (3) Teaching Strategies were effective (4) Teaching Strategies were effective (5) Excellent Overall quality of this presentation Overall quality of this presentation (1) Poor Overall quality of this presentation (2) Overall quality of this presentation (3) Overall quality of this presentation (4) Overall quality of this presentation (5) Excellent (* Ethics) Comment: Question Title * 13. Other Comments: Done