Reference number:  CEC08025
Sponsor:  Jubilant DraxImage Inc.

Jubilant Radiopharma will collect the required evaluation feedback and send a compiled report to SNMMI with the participant’s name and an affidavit of success in completing the quiz. The attendee must pass the quiz with a score of 80% or greater in three, or less, attempts.

CEH(s) Available:  1.0

Approving organization: “Approved by SNMMI for ARRT Category A credit.” 

Quiz (Questions 1-10)

Question Title

* 1. Which of the 3 agents, DTPA, Xenon or Technegas, is currently being used in the U.S. for Ventilation SPECT imaging?

Question Title

* 2. Ideally, the smallest aerosol particles will penetrate to which lung tissue level, for optimal Ventilation imaging?

Question Title

* 3. In a young female patient, with a very low pre-test probability for PE, which imaging protocol probably delivers the lowest breast dose?

Question Title

* 4. You can potentially lower the follow-up MAA Perfusion dose if you determined and have recorded the patient’s initial Ventilation _______________?

Question Title

* 5. With a Normal Perfusion scan and a Ventilation scan showing patchy central deposition, the most likely interpretation is _______?

Question Title

* 6. SPECT is better than Planar because it can________?

Question Title

* 7. SPECIFICITY, by definition, interpreting a “No” result when there is truly “No PE”, a true negative finding, has a higher % in __________?

Question Title

* 8. The low dose CT, in a Lung SPECT/CT, allows the Interpreting Nuclear Medicine Physician, to identify other possible sources of the patient’s poor condition such as ________?

Question Title

* 9. If a patient has known Pulmonary Hypertension, for optimal defect size determination, which protocol should be used?

Question Title

* 10. Ideally, all Ventilation imaging should be completed within ________ minutes after nebulizer DTPA aerosol breathing?

Question Title

* 11. Evaluation Form

  Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
The objectives of the activity were met.
The content of the activity was current.
The educational format was appropriate to the audience.
The faculty clearly communicated the educational concepts.
The materials helped me learn the educational concepts.
The activity helped meet my personal educational needs.

Question Title

* 12. Was the program free of bias/promotion of commercial products by faculty?

Question Title

* 13. Please enter in your contact information

Question Title

* 14. Are you an SNMMI Member

Question Title

* 15. Enter your SNMMI  ID Number (if you have one)

Question Title

* 16. Would you recommend this program to your colleagues?

Question Title

* 17. Given the information you learned in the activity, how might you change your work practices?

Question Title

* 18. What were the major strengths/weaknesses of this program?

Question Title

* 19. What suggestions for improvement would you offer?

Question Title

* 20. Please rate the faculty (Randall L. Bursaw) of the activity

  Poor Fair Average Good Excellent
Faculty was knowledgeable
Faculty helped to facilitate learning
Faculty encouraged active learning and audience interaction

Question Title

* 21. Suggestions for future programs include:

Question Title

* 22. Completion Date (MM/DD/Year)

Date

T