Module Evaluation Student Feedback

The Da Vinci Institute for Technology Management's Module Evaluation Form

Question Title

* 1. Your Da Vinci Student Number

Question Title

* 2. Your Name and Surname

Question Title

* 3. Qualification Title

Question Title

* 4. Group Title

Question Title

* 5. Name of Programme Convener

Question Title

* 6. Workshop date

Date / Time

Date

Question Title

* 7. Lecturer Name

Question Title

* 8. Section A: LEARNING CONTENT
Please rate the following:

	Poor	Below average	Average	Above average	Excellent
1. Alignment of content to learning outcomes	1. Alignment of content to learning outcomes Poor	1. Alignment of content to learning outcomes Below average	1. Alignment of content to learning outcomes Average	1. Alignment of content to learning outcomes Above average	1. Alignment of content to learning outcomes Excellent
2. Overall quality of the content: layout/grammar/editing/formatting	2. Overall quality of the content: layout/grammar/editing/formatting Poor	2. Overall quality of the content: layout/grammar/editing/formatting Below average	2. Overall quality of the content: layout/grammar/editing/formatting Average	2. Overall quality of the content: layout/grammar/editing/formatting Above average	2. Overall quality of the content: layout/grammar/editing/formatting Excellent
3. Resources in support of achieving outcomes: additional reading material/multimedia	3. Resources in support of achieving outcomes: additional reading material/multimedia Poor	3. Resources in support of achieving outcomes: additional reading material/multimedia Below average	3. Resources in support of achieving outcomes: additional reading material/multimedia Average	3. Resources in support of achieving outcomes: additional reading material/multimedia Above average	3. Resources in support of achieving outcomes: additional reading material/multimedia Excellent

Question Title

* 9. Section B: LECTURING APPROACH
Please rate the following:

	Poor	Below average	Average	Above average	Excellent
4. Appropriateness of the teaching methods/facilitation process	4. Appropriateness of the teaching methods/facilitation process Poor	4. Appropriateness of the teaching methods/facilitation process Below average	4. Appropriateness of the teaching methods/facilitation process Average	4. Appropriateness of the teaching methods/facilitation process Above average	4. Appropriateness of the teaching methods/facilitation process Excellent
5. Conduciveness of the learning environment to maximise learning	5. Conduciveness of the learning environment to maximise learning Poor	5. Conduciveness of the learning environment to maximise learning Below average	5. Conduciveness of the learning environment to maximise learning Average	5. Conduciveness of the learning environment to maximise learning Above average	5. Conduciveness of the learning environment to maximise learning Excellent
6. Alignment between module content and the assessment process (Summative)	6. Alignment between module content and the assessment process (Summative) Poor	6. Alignment between module content and the assessment process (Summative) Below average	6. Alignment between module content and the assessment process (Summative) Average	6. Alignment between module content and the assessment process (Summative) Above average	6. Alignment between module content and the assessment process (Summative) Excellent
7.The groups' contribution to the learning experience	7.The groups' contribution to the learning experience Poor	7.The groups' contribution to the learning experience Below average	7.The groups' contribution to the learning experience Average	7.The groups' contribution to the learning experience Above average	7.The groups' contribution to the learning experience Excellent

Question Title

* 10. Section C: LECTURER
Please rate the following aspects of the lecturer:

	Poor	Below average	Average	Above average	Excellent
8. Expertise in the subject matter	8. Expertise in the subject matter Poor	8. Expertise in the subject matter Below average	8. Expertise in the subject matter Average	8. Expertise in the subject matter Above average	8. Expertise in the subject matter Excellent
9. Ability to stimulate critical thinking	9. Ability to stimulate critical thinking Poor	9. Ability to stimulate critical thinking Below average	9. Ability to stimulate critical thinking Average	9. Ability to stimulate critical thinking Above average	9. Ability to stimulate critical thinking Excellent
10. Facilitate an interest and understanding of the subject matter	10. Facilitate an interest and understanding of the subject matter Poor	10. Facilitate an interest and understanding of the subject matter Below average	10. Facilitate an interest and understanding of the subject matter Average	10. Facilitate an interest and understanding of the subject matter Above average	10. Facilitate an interest and understanding of the subject matter Excellent
11. Supporting the group in achieving the learning outcomes	11. Supporting the group in achieving the learning outcomes Poor	11. Supporting the group in achieving the learning outcomes Below average	11. Supporting the group in achieving the learning outcomes Average	11. Supporting the group in achieving the learning outcomes Above average	11. Supporting the group in achieving the learning outcomes Excellent
12. Promoting group involvement	12. Promoting group involvement Poor	12. Promoting group involvement Below average	12. Promoting group involvement Average	12. Promoting group involvement Above average	12. Promoting group involvement Excellent

Question Title

* 11. Section D: INDIVIDUAL IMPACT
Please rate the impact of the contact session in:

	Poor	Below average	Average	Above average	Excellent
13. Supporting your personal development	13. Supporting your personal development Poor	13. Supporting your personal development Below average	13. Supporting your personal development Average	13. Supporting your personal development Above average	13. Supporting your personal development Excellent
14. Enhancing your skills, knowledge and thinking	14. Enhancing your skills, knowledge and thinking Poor	14. Enhancing your skills, knowledge and thinking Below average	14. Enhancing your skills, knowledge and thinking Average	14. Enhancing your skills, knowledge and thinking Above average	14. Enhancing your skills, knowledge and thinking Excellent
15. Facilitating a better understanding of your work environment	15. Facilitating a better understanding of your work environment Poor	15. Facilitating a better understanding of your work environment Below average	15. Facilitating a better understanding of your work environment Average	15. Facilitating a better understanding of your work environment Above average	15. Facilitating a better understanding of your work environment Excellent