Skip to content
Mon., Jan. 24, 2022 - The PTAB Today: A Review of the PTAB Landscape and Important Rulings at Age 10
*
1.
Address
(Required.)
Name
Company
State/Province
AL Alabama
AK Alaska
AS American Samoa
AZ Arizona
AR Arkansas
CA California
CO Colorado
CT Connecticut
DE Delaware
DC District of Columbia
FM Federated States of Micronesia
FL Florida
GA Georgia
GU Guam
HI Hawaii
ID Idaho
IL Illinois
IN Indiana
IA Iowa
KS Kansas
KY Kentucky
LA Louisiana
ME Maine
MH Marshall Islands
MD Maryland
MA Massachusetts
MI Michigan
MN Minnesota
MS Mississippi
MO Missouri
MT Montana
NE Nebraska
NV Nevada
NH New Hampshire
NJ New Jersey
NM New Mexico
NY New York
NC North Carolina
ND North Dakota
MP Northern Mariana Islands
OH Ohio
OK Oklahoma
OR Oregon
PW Palau
PA Pennsylvania
PR Puerto Rico
RI Rhode Island
SC South Carolina
SD South Dakota
TN Tennessee
TX Texas
UT Utah
VT Vermont
VI Virgin Islands
VA Virginia
WA Washington
WV West Virginia
WI Wisconsin
WY Wyoming
Country
Email Address
*
2.
Are you seeking CLE credit (Within the US Only) for this program.
(Required.)
Yes
No
3.
If yes, what states are you registered with and what are your registration numbers for each?
State Bar Name and Bar #1
State Bar Name and Bar #2
State Bar Name and Bar #3
State Bar Name and Bar #4
*
4.
The panel ran from 11:00 AM to 12:15 PM. Beginning at 11:00 AM, of the 75 minutes,
how many minutes
did you attend?
(Required.)
*
5.
Did this panel meet your educational objectives
(Required.)
Excellent
Very good
Good
Fair
Poor
*
6.
Please evaluate each of the speakers on their overall teaching effectiveness (5 high; 1 low).
(Required.)
1
2
3
4
5
Kayvan Noroozi
1
2
3
4
5
Nicholas Matich
1
2
3
4
5
Lori Gordon
1
2
3
4
5
Gene Quinn
1
2
3
4
5
*
7.
Please evaluate each of the speakers on their knowledge of the subject matter (5 high; 1 low).
(Required.)
1
2
3
4
5
Kayvan Noroozi
1
2
3
4
5
Nicholas Matich
1
2
3
4
5
Lori Gordon
1
2
3
4
5
Gene Quinn
1
2
3
4
5
8.
Is there an issue related to this topic that deserved further attention by the panel? If yes, what issue?
*
9.
Did the substantive discussions contain significant professional content?
(Required.)
Yes
No
*
10.
Is this a topic that a future IPWatchdog program should include?
(Required.)
Yes
No
11.
Are there any other topics you would suggest for future IPWatchdog Masters programs?
12.
If you would like to give us a quote we can use for promotional purposes for a future IPWatchdog® program, please feel free to do so below.
13.
Do you have any other comments, suggestions or feedback?