John Wade Symposium - Quality Improvement and Patient Safety in AI

Learning Objectives:

After attending this session, participants will be able to:

1. Discuss the role of AI within Quality Improvement: Gain insights into how AI is being utilized to drive advancements in QI frameworks and patient safety strategies.
2. Utilize AI for data analysis: Learn about innovative applications of AI for analyzing large datasets to predict outcomes, identify trends, and optimize healthcare decision-making.
3. Foster equity in AI-driven QI: Discuss strategies to address bias and improve equity and inclusivity when implementing AI tools in QI projects.
4. Evaluate the quality of AI in healthcare: Identify critical standards for assessing the safety, reliability, and ethical implications of AI technologies in QI initiatives.
1.Overall Session Evaluation
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The objectives were clearly stated 
The stated objectives were met 
I acquired new skills and/or knowledge
I was introduced to new perspectives on my current practice
The content was relevant to my learning needs
This session promoted interaction (i.e., Q&A, polling etc.)
2.Which CanMEDS roles were addressed?
3.Moderator: Dr Conor Mc Donnell
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The moderator was organized and managed the  session well
4.Speaker: Dr Pascal Laferrière-Langlois
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future
5.Speaker: Dr Arnaud Mbadjeu Hondjeu
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future
6.Speaker: Dr Abi Sriharan
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future
7.Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the presentations with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?
0
5
10
8.The session and presenter(s) were balanced and free from commercial bias
9.Please provide any additional comments or suggestions regarding this session, moderator(s), and speaker(s).
Thank you for completing the evaluation!