Learning Objectives:

After attending this session, participants will be able to:

1. Discuss the role of AI within Quality Improvement: Gain insights into how AI is being utilized to drive advancements in QI frameworks and patient safety strategies.
2. Utilize AI for data analysis: Learn about innovative applications of AI for analyzing large datasets to predict outcomes, identify trends, and optimize healthcare decision-making.
3. Foster equity in AI-driven QI: Discuss strategies to address bias and improve equity and inclusivity when implementing AI tools in QI projects.
4. Evaluate the quality of AI in healthcare: Identify critical standards for assessing the safety, reliability, and ethical implications of AI technologies in QI initiatives.

Question Title

1. Overall Session Evaluation

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
The objectives were clearly stated 
The stated objectives were met 
I acquired new skills and/or knowledge
I was introduced to new perspectives on my current practice
The content was relevant to my learning needs
This session promoted interaction (i.e., Q&A, polling etc.)

Question Title

2. Which CanMEDS roles were addressed?

Question Title

3. Moderator: Dr Conor Mc Donnell

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
The moderator was organized and managed the  session well

Question Title

4. Speaker: Dr Pascal Laferrière-Langlois

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future

Question Title

5. Speaker: Dr Arnaud Mbadjeu Hondjeu

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future

Question Title

6. Speaker: Dr Abi Sriharan

  Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future

Question Title

7. Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the presentations with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?

0 5 10
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

8. The session and presenter(s) were balanced and free from commercial bias

Question Title

9. Please provide any additional comments or suggestions regarding this session, moderator(s), and speaker(s).

Thank you for completing the evaluation!

T