Session Evaluation - Mathew Leonardi & Basma Al-Arnawoot

Plenary:
Imaging in Endometriosis

Speakers: Mathew Leonardi & Basma Al-Arnawoot

Learning objectives:
At the conclusion of this activity, the participant will be able to:

Diagnose endometriosis
Map endometriosis for preoperative planning

Conflict of interest disclosure are available in the conference mobile application.

	1 - Strongly disagree	2 - Disagree	3 - Neutral	4 - Agree	5 - Strongly agree
Met the stated learning objectives	Met the stated learning objectives 1 - Strongly disagree	Met the stated learning objectives 2 - Disagree	Met the stated learning objectives 3 - Neutral	Met the stated learning objectives 4 - Agree	Met the stated learning objectives 5 - Strongly agree
Enhanced my knowledge	Enhanced my knowledge 1 - Strongly disagree	Enhanced my knowledge 2 - Disagree	Enhanced my knowledge 3 - Neutral	Enhanced my knowledge 4 - Agree	Enhanced my knowledge 5 - Strongly agree
Satisfied my expectations	Satisfied my expectations 1 - Strongly disagree	Satisfied my expectations 2 - Disagree	Satisfied my expectations 3 - Neutral	Satisfied my expectations 4 - Agree	Satisfied my expectations 5 - Strongly agree
Conveyed information that applied to my pratice	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 1 - Strongly disagree	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 2 - Disagree	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 3 - Neutral	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 4 - Agree	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 5 - Strongly agree
Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 1 - Strongly disagree	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 2 - Disagree	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 3 - Neutral	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 4 - Agree	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 5 - Strongly agree
Was free from commercial bias	Was free from commercial bias 1 - Strongly disagree	Was free from commercial bias 2 - Disagree	Was free from commercial bias 3 - Neutral	Was free from commercial bias 4 - Agree	Was free from commercial bias 5 - Strongly agree

1 - Strongly disagree

2 - Disagree

3 - Neutral

4 - Agree

5 - Strongly agree

Met the stated learning objectives

Met the stated learning objectives 1 - Strongly disagree

Met the stated learning objectives 2 - Disagree

Met the stated learning objectives 3 - Neutral

Met the stated learning objectives 4 - Agree

Met the stated learning objectives 5 - Strongly agree

Enhanced my knowledge

Enhanced my knowledge 1 - Strongly disagree

Enhanced my knowledge 2 - Disagree

Enhanced my knowledge 3 - Neutral

Enhanced my knowledge 4 - Agree

Enhanced my knowledge 5 - Strongly agree

Satisfied my expectations

Satisfied my expectations 1 - Strongly disagree

Satisfied my expectations 2 - Disagree

Satisfied my expectations 3 - Neutral

Satisfied my expectations 4 - Agree

Satisfied my expectations 5 - Strongly agree

Conveyed information that applied to my pratice

Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 1 - Strongly disagree

Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 2 - Disagree

Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 3 - Neutral

Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 4 - Agree

Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 5 - Strongly agree

Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction

Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 1 - Strongly disagree

Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 2 - Disagree

Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 3 - Neutral

Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 4 - Agree

Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 5 - Strongly agree

Was free from commercial bias

Was free from commercial bias 1 - Strongly disagree

Was free from commercial bias 2 - Disagree

Was free from commercial bias 3 - Neutral

Was free from commercial bias 4 - Agree

Was free from commercial bias 5 - Strongly agree

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

1 - Bad

2 - Not bad

3 - Good

4 - Very good

5 - Extremely good

Knowledge

Knowledge 1 - Bad

Knowledge 2 - Not bad

Knowledge 3 - Good

Knowledge 4 - Very good

Knowledge 5 - Extremely good

Presentation skills

Presentation skills 1 - Bad

Presentation skills 2 - Not bad

Presentation skills 3 - Good

Presentation skills 4 - Very good

Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good

Topic relevance

Topic relevance 1 - Bad

Topic relevance 2 - Not bad

Topic relevance 3 - Good

Topic relevance 4 - Very good

Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

1 - Bad

2 - Not bad

3 - Good

4 - Very good

5 - Extremely good

Knowledge

Knowledge 1 - Bad

Knowledge 2 - Not bad

Knowledge 3 - Good

Knowledge 4 - Very good

Knowledge 5 - Extremely good

Presentation skills

Presentation skills 1 - Bad

Presentation skills 2 - Not bad

Presentation skills 3 - Good

Presentation skills 4 - Very good

Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good

Topic relevance

Topic relevance 1 - Bad

Topic relevance 2 - Not bad

Topic relevance 3 - Good

Topic relevance 4 - Very good

Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Overall	Overall 1 - Bad	Overall 2 - Not bad	Overall 3 - Good	Overall 4 - Very good	Overall 5 - Extremely good

1 - Bad

2 - Not bad

3 - Good

4 - Very good

5 - Extremely good

Overall

Overall 1 - Bad

Overall 2 - Not bad

Overall 3 - Good

Overall 4 - Very good

Overall 5 - Extremely good

Session Evaluation - Mathew Leonardi & Basma Al-Arnawoot | CanSAGE 2023

Question Title

* 1. Your name and email (this information will not be shared with anyone)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate the quality of the session on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

Question Title

* 3. If you perceived any sources of commercial bias, please describe:

Question Title

* 4. What did you learn or how will this educational session impact your practice?

Question Title

* 5. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity?

Question Title

* 6. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Mathew Leonardi:

Question Title

* 7. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Basma Al-Arnawoot:

Question Title

* 8. Please rate the overall session:

Question Title

* 9. Any additional comments?