Skip to content
MM2025 PMCX61 Survey
1.
How would you rate your overall experience at the PMC?
Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
Very Poor
2.
Are you currently using cryoEM in your research?
Yes
No
3.
How did you hear about the PMC? Select all that apply.
Email
Colleague
Social Media
Website
Conference or booth
Webinar
Other (please specify)
4.
What is your career level?
Undergraduate
Graduate
Postdoctoral
Senior Scientist/PI
Professional staff
Industry/Vendor
Other (please specify)
5.
When you go to M&M what type of symposia do you normally attend? Select all that apply.
Analytical Sciences Symposia
Biological Sciences Symposia
Physical Sciences Symposia
Cross-Cutting Sciences Symposia
Other (please specify)
6.
Which aspects of cryoEM are you most interested in? Select all that apply.
Instrumentation Access
Sample Preparation
Data Acquisition
Software Improvements
Data Processing
Training and Outreach
Other (please specify)
7.
How would you rate the overall quality of the invited talks?
Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
Very Poor
8.
Were you satisfied with the distribution of topics? What others topics would you have liked to be covered, or expanded on?
9.
How would you rate the overall organization of the PMC?
Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
Very Poor
10.
Did you participate in the poster session?
Yes
No
11.
Did come on the University of Utah visit and core tour/demo?
Yes
No
12.
If you went to the University of Utah, how was the off-site event? Did you enjoy the tours and demos? What went well and what could have been done better?
13.
How would you rate the networking opportunities provided at the event?
Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
Very Poor
14.
What was the most valuable takeaway from the PMC?
15.
Please share any additional comments or feedback you have about the PMC.
Send me a copy of my responses via email
Current Progress,
0 of 15 answered
