Lessons Learned from Solid Organ Transplantation: Managing the Patients with Severe Organ Dysfunction Undergoing Non-Transplant Surgery

Learning Objectives:

After attending this session, participants will be able to:

1. Describe the state of solid organ transplantation anesthesia in Canada and its future.
2. Review the management of patients with severe organ dysfunction.
3. Explore risk stratification tools to guide perioperative decision-making for the transplant patients undergoing non-transplant surgery.
1.Overall Session Evaluation
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The objectives were clearly stated 
The stated objectives were met 
I acquired new skills and/or knowledge
I was introduced to new perspectives on my current practice
The content was relevant to my learning needs
This session promoted interaction (i.e., Q&A, polling etc.)
2.This session encouraged me to consider changes to my practice
3.Which CanMEDS roles were addressed?
4.Moderator: Dr François Martin Carrier
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The moderator was organized and managed the  session well
5.Speaker: Dr Carla Luzzi
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future
6.Speaker: Dr Sonja Payne
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future
7.Speaker: Dr Kristen Kidson
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future
8.Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the presentation with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?
0
5
10
9.The session and presenter(s) were balanced and free from commercial bias
10.Please provide any additional comments or suggestions regarding this session, moderator(s), and speaker(s).
Thank you for completing the evaluation!