Skip to content
Lecture Evaluation
27%
*
1.
Which lecture are you evaluating?
(Required.)
ACOs: Where to Begin?
ASCO-CAP Guidelines for Breast Predictive Factor Testing
Bacterial Identification by Mass Spectrometry
Clinical Laboratory Automation: Evaluating and Selecting an Automation System
Diabetes Mellitus & Metabolic Syndrome
Diagnosis of Monoclonal Gammopathies
Drug Testing to Support Pain Management Clinics
Epidemic of Vitamin D Deficiency and Health Hazards
Fetal Lung Maturity Testing: Current Challenges and Considerations
From Mad Hatters to Thimerosal: The Truth about Mercury Poisoning
Genetics of Familial Colorectal Cancer Syndromes
Genomic Hybridization
Harmful Effects of Stored RBC Transfusion: Bench to Bedside
Hemoglobinopathies: Clinical and Hematologic Features and Molecular Basis
Hepatitis B Drug Resistance: Navigating the Way Forward
How to Write a Scientific Paper
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin
Lab Strategies in an Era of Health Care Reform
Legislative & Regulatory Issues Facing Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
Maternal Metabolic Disorders Identified Through Newborn Screening
Medicaid Program Changes: Addressing Concerns for the Clinical Laboratory
Neural Tube Defects
Optimizing Warfarin Dose
Other
Prion Disease History and Transmission in a Medical Setting
Procalcitonin
Rapid-Cycle PCR
Testing a Test: Beyond Sensitivity and Specificity
The Shifting Regulatory Sands for Clinical Laboratories
Other (please specify)
2.
What is your position? This helps us know what segment of the medical field enjoys or dislikes this lecture:
Medical Technical (MT: Lab or medical personnel)
Non-Medical Technical (NMT: Support/Office area personnel)
Supervisor/Manager (MT)
Supervisor/Manager (NMT)
If you'd rather be specific, please specify:
3.
To what extent was the speaker knowledgeable, organized, and effective during the presentation?
1 = Poor
2 = Fair
3 = Good
4 = Excellent
N/A
Speaker Rating:
4.
To what extent did the speaker clarify and focus on the stated objectives?
1 = Poor
2 = Fair
3 = Good
4 = Excellent
N/A
Speaker Rating:
5.
To what extent were the speaker's teaching methods and aids appropriate and effective?
1 = Poor
2 = Fair
3 = Good
4 = Excellent
N/A
Speaker Rating:
6.
To what extent were the teaching methods and aids appropriately and effectively used?
1 = Poor
2 = Fair
3 = Good
4 = Excellent
N/A
Speaker Rating:
If less than 4 marked for any of the speaker ratings, why?
7.
To what extent did the program content relate to the program's objectives?
1 = Poor
2 = Fair
3 = Good
4 = Excellent
N/A
Content Rating:
8.
Rate the contribution of this session to your overall knowledge of this subject?
1 = Poor
2 = Fair
3 = Good
4 = Excellent
N/A
Content Rating:
9.
Rate your overall degree of satisfaction with this session?
1 = Poor
2 = Fair
3 = Good
4 = Excellent
N/A
Content Rating:
10.
Rate your level of expertise in this subject prior to this session?
1 = Poor
2 = Fair
3 = Good
4 = Excellent
N/A
Content Rating:
If less than 4 marked for any of the content ratings, why?
