Skip to content
ICS 2026 Delegate Workshop Evaluation
Thank you for taking the time to review the ICS 2026 Workshops.
This short evaluation form should only take 5-10mins to complete.
Anonymized responses will be provided to the ICS Education Committee and workshop Chairs following the event.
*
1.
Which workshop are you reviewing?
(Required.)
Workshop 1, Basic Urodynamics - An Interactive Workshop
Workshop 2, Urinary Tract Infection in Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (nLUTD): From Definitions to Decision-Making
Workshop 3, Advancing Research and Clinical Guidance on Women’s Bladder Self-Care Practices
Workshop 4, Clinical Decision-Making in Reconstructive NeuroUrology: Lessons from Real Cases
Workshop 5, Navigating the Unique Challenges in Adolescent Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Management: Hands-On Course
Workshop 6, Incontinence after Prostate Treatment - Innovations In Managing Initial and Recurrent Incontinence
Workshop 7, First steps in robotic urinary tract and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery
Workshop 8, Avoiding Overtreatment in Functional Urology: Recognising When Less Is More
Workshop 9, Pelvic Organ Prolapse and LUTS Across the Female Lifespan: From Reproductive Years to Advanced Age
Workshop 10, Beyond the Pelvis: Non-invasive Conservative Care for Chronic Pelvic Pain (Bridging evidence, clinical practice, and access-friendly strategies)
Workshop 11, Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Optimise Urodynamics
Workshop 12, Making Sense of IC/BPS: How to Diagnose and Treat Smarter With AI, Biomarkers, Emerging Therapies Through a Practical Phenotype-Based Algorithm
Workshop 13, Sustainability in continence care
Workshop 14, ICS Physiotherapy Committee Workshop: From trampoline to bench press and everything in between – what do we know about pelvic floor loading during physical activity? (ICS CORE CURRICULUM)
Workshop 15, Ketamine-induced Uropathy: An interdisciplinary, Practice-Oriented Approach for Urologist
Workshop 16, Tackling Challenging Cases in Fecal Incontinence through Multidisciplinary Expertise: A pelvic floor disorders consortium and ICS Workshop
Workshop 17, IUGA - Pessary Workshop
Workshop 18, Sexual Trauma and LUTS
Workshop 19, Hands-on Sacral Neuromodulation Training with World Leading Experts #1
Workshop 20, Hands-on Sacral Neuromodulation Training with World Leading Experts #2
Workshop 21, Integrated Total Pelvic Floor Ultrasound in Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Workshop 22, Optimising Pelvic Floor Outcomes Through Multidisciplinary Practice
Workshop 23, Major pelvic surgery and pelvic radiation: Urological and Colorectal outcomes, effects on lower urinary tract, bowel function and sexual function
Workshop 24, Proactive multidisciplinary care of incontinence during aged- care hospital admission
Workshop 25, Translational Research Ethics: From Bench to Bedside — Navigating the Grey Zones
*
2.
Please note how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements
(Required.)
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The speakers were engaging and experts in the field
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The length and pace of the workshop was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The handouts were easy to download and beneficial to my learning
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
This workshop was appropriately multi-disciplinary
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
This workshop was appropriately multi-national
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
If you answered 'Disagree' or 'Strongly Disagree' to any of the above, please expand on your answer.
*
3.
Please rate the following qualities of the workshop?
(Required.)
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Originality
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevance
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Innovation
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
If you answered 'Fair' or 'Poor' to any of the above, please expand on your answer.
*
4.
Were the objectives of this workshop met?
(Required.)
Yes
No
If 'No', please expand.
*
5.
What were your main take aways from this workshop?
(Required.)
6.
Please note any improvement suggestions for this workshop here.
