Deadline for this survey is April 13, 2018.

* 1. Please enter your RN and/or NH number below. This information is required to receive contact hours/certificate of attendance.

* 2. First Name

* 3. Last Name

* 4. How satisfied were you with the registration process?

* 5. How would you rate this convention compared to others that you have attended?

* 6. Please rate the convention "staff" regarding helpfulness/courteousness.

* 7. Overall, how satisfied were you with the convention facilities?

* 8. Would you recommend this convention to others?

* 9. Was this your first PADONA convention?

* 10. Do you plan to attend this convention again next year?

* 11. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The program met the stated objectives - Abuse Reporting and Investigations - Stephanie Kirkpatrick

* 12. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was appropriate for the intended audience - Abuse Reporting and Investigations - Stephanie Kirkpatrick

* 13. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was consistent with the stated objectives - Abuse Reporting and Investigations - Stephanie Kirkpatrick

* 14. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Knowledgeable in content areas - Abuse Reporting and Investigations - Stephanie Kirkpatrick

* 15. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Presented useful examples - Abuse Reporting and Investigations - Stephanie Kirkpatrick

* 16. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Speaking/teaching ability - Abuse Reporting and Investigations - Stephanie Kirkpatrick

* 17. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Responsiveness to questions - Abuse Reporting and Investigations - Stephanie Kirkpatrick

* 18. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The program met the stated objectives - Role of Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant in Nursing Home - Candace McMullen 

* 19. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was appropriate for the intended audience - Role of Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant in Nursing Home - Candace McMullen 

* 20. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was consistent with the stated objectives - Role of Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant in Nursing Home - Candace McMullen

* 21. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Knowledgeable in content areas - Role of Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant in Nursing Home - Candace McMullen 

* 22. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Presented useful examples - Role of Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant in Nursing Home - Candace McMullen 

* 23. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Speaking/teaching ability - Role of Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant in Nursing Home - Candace McMullen

* 24. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Responsiveness to questions - Role of Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant in Nursing Home - Candace McMullen 

* 25. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The program met the stated objectives - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 1 - Paula Sanders

* 26. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was appropriate for the intended audience - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 1 - Paula Sanders

* 27. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was consistent with the stated objectives - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 1 - Paula Sanders

* 28. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Knowledgeable in content areas - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 1 - Paula Sanders

* 29. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Presented useful examples - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 1 - Paula Sanders

* 30. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Speaking/teaching ability - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 1 - Paula Sanders

* 31. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Responsiveness to questions - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 1 - Paula Sanders

* 32. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The program met the stated objectives - The Triple Aim for SNF Nursing Leadership: Right Staff, Right Resources, Right Focus - Kim Suda

* 33. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was appropriate for the intended audience - The Triple Aim for SNF Nursing Leadership: Right Staff, Right Resources, Right Focus - Kim Suda

* 34. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was consistent with the stated objectives - The Triple Aim for SNF Nursing Leadership: Right Staff, Right Resources, Right Focus - Kim Suda

* 35. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Knowledgeable in content areas - The Triple Aim for SNF Nursing Leadership: Right Staff, Right Resources, Right Focus - Kim Suda

* 36. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Presented useful examples - The Triple Aim for SNF Nursing Leadership: Right Staff, Right Resources, Right Focus - Kim Suda

* 37. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Speaking/teaching ability - The Triple Aim for SNF Nursing Leadership: Right Staff, Right Resources, Right Focus - Kim Suda

* 38. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Responsiveness to questions - The Triple Aim for SNF Nursing Leadership: Right Staff, Right Resources, Right Focus - Kim Suda

* 39. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The program met the stated objectives - Medical Record Documentation in Support of the Critical Pathways - Sophie Campbell

* 40. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was appropriate for the intended audience - Medical Record Documentation in Support of the Critical Pathways - Sophie Campbell

* 41. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was consistent with the stated objectives - Medical Record Documentation in Support of the Critical Pathways - Sophie Campbell

* 42. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Knowledgeable in content areas - Medical Record Documentation in Support of the Critical Pathways - Sophie Campbell

* 43. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Presented useful examples - Medical Record Documentation in Support of the Critical Pathways - Sophie Campbell

* 44. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Speaking/teaching ability - Medical Record Documentation in Support of the Critical Pathways - Sophie Campbell

* 45. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Responsiveness to questions - Medical Record Documentation in Support of the Critical Pathways - Sophie Campbell

* 46. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The program met the stated objectives - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 2 - Paula Sanders

* 47. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was appropriate for the intended audience - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 2 - Paula Sanders

* 48. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was consistent with the stated objectives - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 2 - Paula Sanders

* 49. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Knowledgeable in content areas - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 2 - Paula Sanders

* 50. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Presented useful examples - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 2 - Paula Sanders

* 51. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Speaking/teaching ability - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 2 - Paula Sanders

* 52. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Responsiveness to questions - CMS Can Help You Prepare for Surveys: Do You Know How? – Part 2 - Paula Sanders

* 53. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The program met the stated objectives - Who Has What it Takes? - Candace McMullen

* 54. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was appropriate for the intended audience - Who Has What it Takes? - Candace McMullen

* 55. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was consistent with the stated objectives - Who Has What it Takes? - Candace McMullen

* 56. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Knowledgeable in content areas - Who Has What it Takes? - Candace McMullen

* 57. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Presented useful examples - Who Has What it Takes? - Candace McMullen

* 58. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Speaking/teaching ability - Who Has What it Takes? - Candace McMullen

* 59. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Responsiveness to questions - Who Has What it Takes? - Candace McMullen

* 60. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The program met the stated objectives - The Birds and the Bees:  Sexuality in Dementia Care - Alison Sprankle

* 61. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was appropriate for the intended audience - The Birds and the Bees: Sexuality in Dementia Care - Alison Sprankle

* 62. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was consistent with the stated objectives - The Birds and the Bees: Sexuality in Dementia Care - Alison Sprankle

* 63. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Knowledgeable in content areas - The Birds and the Bees: Sexuality in Dementia Care - Alison Sprankle

* 64. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Presented useful examples - The Birds and the Bees: Sexuality in Dementia Care - Alison Sprankle

* 65. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Speaking/teaching ability - The Birds and the Bees: Sexuality in Dementia Care - Alison Sprankle

* 66. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Responsiveness to questions - The Birds and the Bees: Sexuality in Dementia Care - Alison Sprankle

* 67. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The program met the stated objectives - Leadership 201: Challenges, Changes and Triumphs! - Chris Ridenhour

* 68. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was appropriate for the intended audience - Leadership 201: Challenges, Changes and Triumphs! - Chris Ridenhour

* 69. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was consistent with the stated objectives - Leadership 201: Challenges, Changes and Triumphs! - Chris Ridenhour

* 70. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Knowledgeable in content areas - Leadership 201: Challenges, Changes and Triumphs! - Chris Ridenhour

* 71. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Presented useful examples - Leadership 201: Challenges, Changes and Triumphs! - Chris Ridenhour

* 72. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Speaking/teaching ability - Leadership 201: Challenges, Changes and Triumphs! - Chris Ridenhour

* 73. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Responsiveness to questions - Leadership 201: Challenges, Changes and Triumphs! - Chris Ridenhour

* 74. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The program met the stated objectives - How QAPI and Culture Change Fit Together  - Karen Schoeneman

* 75. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was appropriate for the intended audience - How QAPI and Culture Change Fit Together - Karen Schoeneman

* 76. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was consistent with the stated objectives - How QAPI and Culture Change Fit Together - Karen Schoeneman

* 77. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Knowledgeable in content areas - How QAPI and Culture Change Fit Together - Karen Schoeneman

* 78. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Presented useful examples - How QAPI and Culture Change Fit Together - Karen Schoeneman

* 79. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Speaking/teaching ability - How QAPI and Culture Change Fit Together - Karen Schoeneman

* 80. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Responsiveness to questions - How QAPI and Culture Change Fit Together - Karen Schoeneman

* 81. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The program met the stated objectives - Department of Health Update - Susan Williamson

* 82. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was appropriate for the intended audience- Department of Health Update - Susan Williamson

* 83. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was consistent with the stated objectives- Department of Health Update - Susan Williamson

* 84. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Knowledgeable in content areas- Department of Health Update - Susan Williamson

* 85. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Presented useful examples- Department of Health Update - Susan Williamson

* 86. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Speaking/teaching ability- Department of Health Update - Susan Williamson

* 87. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Responsiveness to questions- Department of Health Update - Susan Williamson

* 88. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The program met the stated objectives - Sepsis – The Key to Survival is Early Identification - JoAnn Adkins

* 89. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was appropriate for the intended audience - Sepsis – The Key to Survival is Early Identification - JoAnn Adkins

* 90. Please indicate your rating of the program in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
The content was consistent with the stated objectives - Sepsis – The Key to Survival is Early Identification - JoAnn Adkins

* 91. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Knowledgeable in content areas - Sepsis – The Key to Survival is Early Identification - JoAnn Adkins

* 92. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Presented useful examples - Sepsis – The Key to Survival is Early Identification - JoAnn Adkins

* 93. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Speaking/teaching ability - Sepsis – The Key to Survival is Early Identification - JoAnn Adkins

* 94. Please indicate your rating of the faculty in the category below, using a scale of 1 (lowest) through 5 (highest):
Responsiveness to questions - Sepsis – The Key to Survival is Early Identification - JoAnn Adkins

* 95. Electronic handouts were easily retrieved for printing or viewing on laptop, PC, tablet etc.

* 96. Did the information presented during the convention sessions reinforce/improve your current knowledge/skills?

* 97. Did the information presented during the convention sessions provide new ideas/information you expect to use?

* 98. Please rate the projected impact of the convention programs on your competence/performance.

* 99. Electronic handouts will be used as a resource within my facility.

* 100. Please list any general comments you have on the convention, as well as any comments on speakers who presented but were not listed on this survey.

T