City of Oroville Shoreline Master Program Update

The City of Oroville is conducting a comprehensive review and periodic update of its Shoreline Master Program (SMP) as required by state law. The SMP applies to all marine waters, lakes over 20 acres, and larger streams (over 20 cubic feet per second) as well as associated wetlands and uplands at least 200 feet on a horizontal plane from the Ordinary-High-Water-Mark of the shoreline. The Okanogan River, Lake Osoyoos and the Similkameen River and any associated wetlands are within the jurisdiction of the SMP. This project will focus on updating policies and regulations to ensure consistency with current state law. Please help guide this project by providing your input to the following questions. Skip any that do not apply to you.

Question Title

* 1. What is your relationship to Shorelines in Oroville? (Check all that apply)

I recreate along shorelines (e.g. walk beaches or trails, camp near shorelines, etc.).

I boat or fish on the water bodies.

I have a business dependent on Oroville shorelines (e.g. marina, aquaculture, etc.).

I own, rent or have access to, property within 200 feet of the Okanogan River, Lake Osoyoos or the Similkameen River?

Name all that apply

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. The state Shoreline Management Act requires local SMPs to balance three goals: Use & Development, Public Access, and Resource Protection along our local shorelines of the state.
Which of the following SMP Governing Principles do you support (select all that apply)

Ensuring local regulations are consistent with state laws & rules

Achieving local planning policies through both regulatory & non-regulatory means

Avoiding unconstitutional infringement upon and taking of private property rights

Applying SMP regulations only to shoreline areas & applying SMP planning functions more broadly across watersheds

Protect shoreline ecological functions

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. What types of use and development activities would you like to see maintained and/or increased in the Shoreline? (select all that apply):

Public access to the shoreline (visual and/or physical)

Private access to the shoreline (stairs to the water)

Commercial development

Education opportunities

Underwater dive parks

Docks, boat ramps, mooring buoys, marinas, etc.

Residential development

Aquaculture (shellfish, finfish)

Fishing

Marine Trades (boat building and repair, etc.)

Water quality

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 4. Questions #4-9: For Recent Permit Applicants

Have you inquired about, applied for, or been issued a shoreline permit by the City of Oroville? If yes, which type or permit (select one and describe the type of development):

Shoreline Exemption

Shoreline Conditional Use Permit

Shoreline Variance

Shoreline Substantial Development Permit

Question Title

* 5. Were there any barriers you ran into when attempting to permit a project in Shoreline Jurisdiction? Were the barriers financial, regulatory, or other? (describe):

Question Title

* 6. When presented with the SMP Regulations, were you able to easily comprehend the intent of the regulations, and did you clearly understand the permitting process?

Question Title

* 7. Did you fully understand what was expected from you (i.e. applications, reports, fees) and the reasons for certain requirements such as special reports?

Question Title

* 8. Could you easily get your questions answered in a meaningful and timely manner? (describe):

Question Title

* 9. If you answered questions #4-9, what could be done to improve the regulations, process, etc?

Question Title

* 10. Are there any sections of the SMP or specific provisions that you think the City needs to revise? (describe):

Question Title

* 11. Are there any changes to local circumstance, new information, or improved data the County needs to consider regarding the SMP? (describe):

Question Title

* 12. Is there anything else you would like to share about the SMP comprehensive review and update?

Question Title

* 13. How would you prefer to contribute to the update effort?

Workshop

Field Trip

Survey

Interview

Online Meeting

Not interested

Please provide your email address.

Thank you for your time!

For more information about the SMP comprehensive review/update, please see the project website.

For questions or to sign up to be notified of SMP comprehensive review/update events, please contact:

Kurt Danison, Contract Planner

509-322-4037, kdanison@ncidata.com

City of Oroville Shoreline Master Program Update

Question Title

* 1. What is your relationship to Shorelines in Oroville? (Check all that apply)

Question Title

* 2. The state Shoreline Management Act requires local SMPs to balance three goals: Use & Development, Public Access, and Resource Protection along our local shorelines of the state. Which of the following SMP Governing Principles do you support (select all that apply)

Question Title

* 3. What types of use and development activities would you like to see maintained and/or increased in the Shoreline? (select all that apply):

Question Title

* 4. Questions #4-9: For Recent Permit Applicants

Question Title

* 5. Were there any barriers you ran into when attempting to permit a project in Shoreline Jurisdiction? Were the barriers financial, regulatory, or other? (describe):

Question Title

* 6. When presented with the SMP Regulations, were you able to easily comprehend the intent of the regulations, and did you clearly understand the permitting process?

Question Title

* 7. Did you fully understand what was expected from you (i.e. applications, reports, fees) and the reasons for certain requirements such as special reports?

Question Title

* 8. Could you easily get your questions answered in a meaningful and timely manner? (describe):

Question Title

* 9. If you answered questions #4-9, what could be done to improve the regulations, process, etc?

Question Title

* 10. Are there any sections of the SMP or specific provisions that you think the City needs to revise? (describe):

Question Title

* 11. Are there any changes to local circumstance, new information, or improved data the County needs to consider regarding the SMP? (describe):

Question Title

* 12. Is there anything else you would like to share about the SMP comprehensive review and update?

Question Title

* 13. How would you prefer to contribute to the update effort?

* 2. The state Shoreline Management Act requires local SMPs to balance three goals: Use & Development, Public Access, and Resource Protection along our local shorelines of the state.
Which of the following SMP Governing Principles do you support (select all that apply)