2017 Legal and Ethics Conference Survey

Question Title

* 1. Overall, how would you rate the 2017 Legal & Ethics Conference ?

Excellent

Very good

Good

Fair

Poor

Additional comments

Question Title

* 2. Which category best describes your attendee status? (Check all that apply)

Ethics Officer

Attorney

Compliance Officer/Auditor

Other

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. How helpful was the content presented at the 2017 Legal & Ethics Conference?

Extremely helpful

Very helpful

Somewhat helpful

Not so helpful

Not at all helpful

Additional comments

Question Title

* 4. Overall, how relevant was the content of the 2017 Legal and Ethics Conference to your job in state government?

Extremely relevant

Very relevant

Somewhat relevant

Not very relevant

Not at all relevant

Not applicable (not a state employee)

Additional comments

Question Title

* 5. On a scale from 1 (not at all relevant) to 7 (extremely relevant), please rate how relevant each presentation was to you. The more you feel the presentation was relevant to you, the higher you would rate it. The less you feel the presentation was relevant to you, the lower you would rate it. If you were not present for a particular presentation, please leave that rating box blank.

	1-Not at all relevant	2	3	4	5	6	7-Extremely relevant
Ethics and a Culture of Integrity	Ethics and a Culture of Integrity 1-Not at all relevant	Ethics and a Culture of Integrity 2	Ethics and a Culture of Integrity 3	Ethics and a Culture of Integrity 4	Ethics and a Culture of Integrity 5	Ethics and a Culture of Integrity 6	Ethics and a Culture of Integrity 7-Extremely relevant
Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers	Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers 1-Not at all relevant	Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers 2	Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers 3	Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers 4	Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers 5	Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers 6	Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers 7-Extremely relevant
State Ethics Commission: Best Practices	State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 1-Not at all relevant	State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 2	State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 3	State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 4	State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 5	State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 6	State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 7-Extremely relevant
Ethics: Indiana Code of Ethics Panel	Ethics: Indiana Code of Ethics Panel 1-Not at all relevant	Ethics: Indiana Code of Ethics Panel 2	Ethics: Indiana Code of Ethics Panel 3	Ethics: Indiana Code of Ethics Panel 4	Ethics: Indiana Code of Ethics Panel 5	Ethics: Indiana Code of Ethics Panel 6	Ethics: Indiana Code of Ethics Panel 7-Extremely relevant

Additional comments

Question Title

* 6. Overall, how engaging were the speakers at the 2017 Legal & Ethics Conference?

Extremely engaging

Very engaging

Somewhat engaging

Not so engaging

Not at all engaging

Additional comments

Question Title

* 7. On a scale from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent), please rate the quality of each presentation. Please consider both the content and delivery of the presentation and whether the speaker was engaging or not. If you you did not attend a certain presentation, please leave that rating box blank.

	1-Very poor	2	3	4	5	6	7-Excellent
Cal Bellamy, Ethics and a Culture of Identity	Cal Bellamy, Ethics and a Culture of Identity 1-Very poor	Cal Bellamy, Ethics and a Culture of Identity 2	Cal Bellamy, Ethics and a Culture of Identity 3	Cal Bellamy, Ethics and a Culture of Identity 4	Cal Bellamy, Ethics and a Culture of Identity 5	Cal Bellamy, Ethics and a Culture of Identity 6	Cal Bellamy, Ethics and a Culture of Identity 7-Excellent
Steven Hunt, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 1	Steven Hunt, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 1 1-Very poor	Steven Hunt, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 1 2	Steven Hunt, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 1 3	Steven Hunt, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 1 4	Steven Hunt, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 1 5	Steven Hunt, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 1 6	Steven Hunt, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 1 7-Excellent
Meg Christensen, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 2	Meg Christensen, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 2 1-Very poor	Meg Christensen, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 2 2	Meg Christensen, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 2 3	Meg Christensen, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 2 4	Meg Christensen, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 2 5	Meg Christensen, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 2 6	Meg Christensen, Professional Responsibility for Government Lawyers Part 2 7-Excellent
James Clevenger, State Ethics Commission: Best Practices	James Clevenger, State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 1-Very poor	James Clevenger, State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 2	James Clevenger, State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 3	James Clevenger, State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 4	James Clevenger, State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 5	James Clevenger, State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 6	James Clevenger, State Ethics Commission: Best Practices 7-Excellent
OIG Attorneys, Indiana Code of Ethics panel	OIG Attorneys, Indiana Code of Ethics panel 1-Very poor	OIG Attorneys, Indiana Code of Ethics panel 2	OIG Attorneys, Indiana Code of Ethics panel 3	OIG Attorneys, Indiana Code of Ethics panel 4	OIG Attorneys, Indiana Code of Ethics panel 5	OIG Attorneys, Indiana Code of Ethics panel 6	OIG Attorneys, Indiana Code of Ethics panel 7-Excellent

Additional Comments

Question Title

* 8. Do you think the 2017 Legal & Ethics Conference was too long, too short, or about right?

Far too long

Too long

About right

Too short

Far too short

Question Title

* 9. What length of time would be appropriate for next year's Legal & Ethics Conference?

6+ hours

5 hours

4 hours

3 hours

2 hours

1 hour

Additional comments

Question Title

* 10. How likely are you to attend the Legal & Ethics Conference again in the future?

Extremely likely

Very likely

Somewhat likely

Not so likely

Not at all likely

Additional comments

Question Title

* 11. In terms of your career development how valuable were the networking opportunities at the 2017 Legal & Ethics Conference?

Extremely valuable

Very valuable

Somewhat valuable

Not very valuable

Not at all valuable

Question Title

* 12. How would you rate the quality of the facilities where the 2017 Legal & Ethics Conference was held?

Excellent

Very good

Good

Fair

Poor

Additional comments

Question Title

* 13. What topics would you most like to learn about at future Legal & Ethics Conferences?

Indiana's ethics rules and statutes

Hot topics in ethics

Risk management/Compliance

White collar crime

Technology and social media resources

Resources available through the Office of Inspector General

Public integrity and maintaining the public's trust in government

Reviews of State Ethics Commission cases

Professional rules of conduct

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 14. What suggestions do you have for improving the Legal & Ethics Conference?

None, it is great as it is.

I have suggestions for improvement (type in comment box below)

Comments (please type here)

Question Title

* 15. What other types of learning would you like the OIG to provide? (Check all that apply)

Computer module/E-learning

Brown bag lunch seminars for Ethics Officers

Formal learning for auditors and investigators

Mini-seminars (in-person) over the course of a year

Webinars

Ethics newsletters or other publications

Other (please specify)