NaRCAD2018 Day 1 Evaluation Intro Question Title * 1. Keynote Talk: "The Little Engine that Could: A Twenty-Year Perspective from the Vermont Academic Detailing Program," Amanda Kennedy Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree N/A The presentation was relevant to my work. The presentation was relevant to my work. Strongly Disagree The presentation was relevant to my work. Somewhat Disagree The presentation was relevant to my work. Neither Agree nor Disagree The presentation was relevant to my work. Somewhat Agree The presentation was relevant to my work. Strongly Agree The presentation was relevant to my work. N/A I was engaged throughout this session. I was engaged throughout this session. Strongly Disagree I was engaged throughout this session. Somewhat Disagree I was engaged throughout this session. Neither Agree nor Disagree I was engaged throughout this session. Somewhat Agree I was engaged throughout this session. Strongly Agree I was engaged throughout this session. N/A The content was of high quality. The content was of high quality. Strongly Disagree The content was of high quality. Somewhat Disagree The content was of high quality. Neither Agree nor Disagree The content was of high quality. Somewhat Agree The content was of high quality. Strongly Agree The content was of high quality. N/A Feedback: OK Question Title * 2. Expert Panel: "Oregon's Comprehensive Approach to Clinical Change for the Opioid Crisis" Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree N/A The presentation was relevant to my work. The presentation was relevant to my work. Strongly Disagree The presentation was relevant to my work. Somewhat Disagree The presentation was relevant to my work. Neither Agree nor Disagree The presentation was relevant to my work. Somewhat Agree The presentation was relevant to my work. Strongly Agree The presentation was relevant to my work. N/A I was engaged throughout this session. I was engaged throughout this session. Strongly Disagree I was engaged throughout this session. Somewhat Disagree I was engaged throughout this session. Neither Agree nor Disagree I was engaged throughout this session. Somewhat Agree I was engaged throughout this session. Strongly Agree I was engaged throughout this session. N/A The content was of high quality. The content was of high quality. Strongly Disagree The content was of high quality. Somewhat Disagree The content was of high quality. Neither Agree nor Disagree The content was of high quality. Somewhat Agree The content was of high quality. Strongly Agree The content was of high quality. N/A Feedback: OK Question Title * 3. Day 1 Field Presentations Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree N/A I was engaged throughout this session. I was engaged throughout this session. Strongly Disagree I was engaged throughout this session. Somewhat Disagree I was engaged throughout this session. Neither Agree nor Disagree I was engaged throughout this session. Somewhat Agree I was engaged throughout this session. Strongly Agree I was engaged throughout this session. N/A The content was of high quality. The content was of high quality. Strongly Disagree The content was of high quality. Somewhat Disagree The content was of high quality. Neither Agree nor Disagree The content was of high quality. Somewhat Agree The content was of high quality. Strongly Agree The content was of high quality. N/A Feedback: OK Question Title * 4. Annual AD Talk: "Moving Beyond the Silos: Academic Detailing and the Full Spectrum of Clinical Care," Jerry Avorn Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree N/A The presentation was relevant to my work. The presentation was relevant to my work. Strongly Disagree The presentation was relevant to my work. Somewhat Disagree The presentation was relevant to my work. Neither Agree nor Disagree The presentation was relevant to my work. Somewhat Agree The presentation was relevant to my work. Strongly Agree The presentation was relevant to my work. N/A I was engaged throughout this session. I was engaged throughout this session. Strongly Disagree I was engaged throughout this session. Somewhat Disagree I was engaged throughout this session. Neither Agree nor Disagree I was engaged throughout this session. Somewhat Agree I was engaged throughout this session. Strongly Agree I was engaged throughout this session. N/A The content was of high quality. The content was of high quality. Strongly Disagree The content was of high quality. Somewhat Disagree The content was of high quality. Neither Agree nor Disagree The content was of high quality. Somewhat Agree The content was of high quality. Strongly Agree The content was of high quality. N/A Feedback: OK NEXT
