20160622 CCMG-CSCC Symposium 2: CCMG The Genetics of Craniofacial Abnormalities Question Title * 1. Please assess the Sessions overrall Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Disagree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Disagree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Neutral Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Agree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Agree The facilities were satisfactory The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Disagree The facilities were satisfactory Disagree The facilities were satisfactory Neutral The facilities were satisfactory Agree The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Agree The session was free from commercial bias The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Disagree The session was free from commercial bias Disagree The session was free from commercial bias Neutral The session was free from commercial bias Agree The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Agree Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Strongly Disagree Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Disagree Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Neutral Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Agree Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent Strongly Agree Please assess each Speaker by their Session: Question Title * 2. The Embryology of Normal and Abnormal Craniofacial DevelopmentSpeaker: Dr. Kathleen Sulik, Cell Biology and Physiology, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill NCObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Summarize major developmental events preceding lip and palate closure.2. Discuss the developmental relationships between the face and brain.3. Discuss gene/environment interactions as a basis for craniofacial malformations.4. Discuss the developmental basis for commonly occurring as well as unusual facial clefts. Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 3. Coffin-Siris and Nicolaides-Baraitser syndromes and related disordersSpeaker: Dr. Dagmar Wieczorek, University of Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf GermanyObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. List the clinical findings for both syndromes.2. Summarize the genes causative for both syndromes.3. Discuss and compare differential diagnoses. Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 4. Nager and CCMS syndromes: Prototypical SpliceosomomathiesSpeaker: Dr. G. Francois Bernier, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Genetics; Director, Clinical Genetics, Alberta Children's’ Hospital, Calgary ABObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Describe the cardinal clinical features of Nager and CCMS syndrome.2. Describe the genetic basis of these spliceosomopathies , with an emphasis on genetic counselling.3. Discuss potential links between splicing and craniofacial and skeletal development. Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 5. Ribosomopathies and spliceosomopathies - an updateSpeaker: Dr. Dagmar Wieczorek, University Clinic Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-UniversityObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. List conditions belonging to the ribosomopathies and spliceosomopathies.2. Explain the clinical features of ribosomopathies and spliceosomopathies.3. Summarize causative genes.4. Compare different conditions belonging to ribosomopathies and spliceosomopathies. Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 6. The importance of global matchmaking to define new genetic syndromes: Examples from craniosynostosisSpeaker: Dr. A. Micheil Innes, Department of Medical Genetics, Alberta Childrens’ Hospital, Calgary ABObjectives: At the end of this session, participants will be able to:1. Discuss the importance, and various examples, of global matchmaking as a means to new gene discovery.2. List the clinical features associated with de novo loss of function mutations in HNRNPK (Au-Kline syndrome).3. List the clinical features associated with autosomal recessive mutations in DPH1 (DEDSHH, Loucks-Innes syndrome). Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of Voice Clarity of Voice Poor Clarity of Voice Fair Clarity of Voice Good Clarity of Voice Very Good Clarity of Voice Outstanding Met Stated Objectives Met Stated Objectives Poor Met Stated Objectives Fair Met Stated Objectives Good Met Stated Objectives Very Good Met Stated Objectives Outstanding Balanced & Unbiased Balanced & Unbiased Poor Balanced & Unbiased Fair Balanced & Unbiased Good Balanced & Unbiased Very Good Balanced & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 7. As a result of attending this session, I am planning to: a) Discuss the session with my colleagues b) Pursue additional learning activities. c) Complete a Personal Learning Project. d) Not change my practice. e) Change my practice. Question Title * 8. Please explain any changes you plan to make or personal learning projects you will pursue as a result of this session: Question Title * 9. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity. (Select all that apply) Medical Expert Communicator Collaborator Manager Health Advocate Scholar Professional Question Title * 10. General comments about individual speaker: Question Title * 11. What topics would you like to be addressed at future conferences to keep you up to date in your profession? Done
