2019-CSCC Monday Roundtables: RM101 - RM108 Question Title * 1. Please choose the Roundtable you attended RM101: The Effective Use of Delta Checks in the Clinical Laboratory - Presenter: Ed Randell RM102: Neuroimmunology for the Clinical Chemist - Presenter: Hans Frykman RM103: Towards Reference Interval Harmonization Across Canada: A Novel Statistical Approach - Presenter: Jake Cosme RM104: Diurnal Variation in Clinical Chemistry: An Underappreciated Source of Pre-Analytical Error - Presenter: Mohamed Abouelhassan RM105: Accuracy of Urine Albumin - Could Laboratory Testing Be So Wrong for So Long? - Presenter: Paul Yip RM106: Back to the Basics - Enzyme Assay Design and Optimization for Thiopurine Methyltransferase (TPMT) by LC-MS - Presenter: Dennis Orton RM107: Unusual Cases in Pediatric Clinical Chemistry - Presenter: Lawrence de Koning RM108: Interesting Cases in Toxicology - Presenter: Catherine Cheng Question Title * 2. Please assess the session overall. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Disagree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Disagree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Neutral Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Agree Sufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning Strongly Agree The facilities were satisfactory The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Disagree The facilities were satisfactory Disagree The facilities were satisfactory Neutral The facilities were satisfactory Agree The facilities were satisfactory Strongly Agree The session was free from commercial bias The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Disagree The session was free from commercial bias Disagree The session was free from commercial bias Neutral The session was free from commercial bias Agree The session was free from commercial bias Strongly Agree Overall, I would rate this Roundtable as excellent Overall, I would rate this Roundtable as excellent Strongly Disagree Overall, I would rate this Roundtable as excellent Disagree Overall, I would rate this Roundtable as excellent Neutral Overall, I would rate this Roundtable as excellent Agree Overall, I would rate this Roundtable as excellent Strongly Agree Ample opportunity for questions/discussion Ample opportunity for questions/discussion Strongly Disagree Ample opportunity for questions/discussion Disagree Ample opportunity for questions/discussion Neutral Ample opportunity for questions/discussion Agree Ample opportunity for questions/discussion Strongly Agree Question Title * 3. Please assess the session Speaker Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding Clarity of voice Clarity of voice Poor Clarity of voice Fair Clarity of voice Good Clarity of voice Very Good Clarity of voice Outstanding Met Stated Ojectives Met Stated Ojectives Poor Met Stated Ojectives Fair Met Stated Ojectives Good Met Stated Ojectives Very Good Met Stated Ojectives Outstanding Balance & Unbiased Balance & Unbiased Poor Balance & Unbiased Fair Balance & Unbiased Good Balance & Unbiased Very Good Balance & Unbiased Outstanding Relevant to Practice Overall Relevant to Practice Overall Poor Relevant to Practice Overall Fair Relevant to Practice Overall Good Relevant to Practice Overall Very Good Relevant to Practice Overall Outstanding Time for Active Learning Time for Active Learning Poor Time for Active Learning Fair Time for Active Learning Good Time for Active Learning Very Good Time for Active Learning Outstanding Comments Question Title * 4. As a result of attending this Roundtable, I am planning to: a) Discuss the Roundtable with my colleagues. b) Pursue additional learning activities. c) Complete a Personal Learning Project. d) Did not change my practice. e) Change my practice. Question Title * 5. Please explain any changes you plan to make or personal learning projects you will pursue as a result of this session: Question Title * 6. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addresses during this educational activity. (Select all that apply) Medical Expert Communicator Collaborator Manager Health Advocate Scholar Professional Question Title * 7. General comments about individual speaker: Question Title * 8. What topics would you like to be addressed at future conferences to keep you up to date in your profession? Done