Evaluating EuroPhilantopics2015 - “Trust Matters” - A lever to deliver better social justice outcomes

Many thanks for your interest in this year’s EuroPhilantopics.We trust that you found the theme and debate interesting and relevant. We would like to make sure that EuroPhilantopics is an effective, relevant and purposeful event that meets your needs. Therefore, in a commitment to continuous improvement and learning we would like to invite you to provide feedback on the structure and content of the day. Your feedback will help us to shape and develop next year’s event. We really appreciate you taking your time to complete this short questionnaire.

Question Title

* 1. What were your main reasons for attending this year’s EuroPhilantopics debate? Tick all that apply

To learn about and engage in this year’s theme of trust

To discover more about the EU work in this area

Opportunities to network with peers

Opportunities to network with policy makers

To explore areas of collaboration

Comments

Question Title

* 2. How did you find out about the EuroPhilantopics debate? Tick all that apply

Prior attendance of EuroPhilantopics

Invitation received by e-mail

Invitation received by other channels

Peers

Colleagues

Partner organisations' website/ social media

EFC's De Facto newsletter

Philanthropic press

Advertising in Effect magazine

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. Was the theme relevant?

Yes

Question Title

* 4. How would you rate the following elements of the EuroPhilantopics debate?

	very effective	somewhat effective	neutral	somewhat ineffective	very ineffective
Raising important issues	Raising important issues very effective	Raising important issues somewhat effective	Raising important issues neutral	Raising important issues somewhat ineffective	Raising important issues very ineffective
Providing useful content and generating ideas	Providing useful content and generating ideas very effective	Providing useful content and generating ideas somewhat effective	Providing useful content and generating ideas neutral	Providing useful content and generating ideas somewhat ineffective	Providing useful content and generating ideas very ineffective
Creating an environment to facilitate a dialogue	Creating an environment to facilitate a dialogue very effective	Creating an environment to facilitate a dialogue somewhat effective	Creating an environment to facilitate a dialogue neutral	Creating an environment to facilitate a dialogue somewhat ineffective	Creating an environment to facilitate a dialogue very ineffective
Providing opportunities to network	Providing opportunities to network very effective	Providing opportunities to network somewhat effective	Providing opportunities to network neutral	Providing opportunities to network somewhat ineffective	Providing opportunities to network very ineffective

Question Title

* 5. In general, how would you rate the following aspects of the plenaries?

	excellent			poor
Speakers	Speakers excellent	Speakers	Speakers	Speakers poor
Moderator	Moderator excellent	Moderator	Moderator	Moderator poor
Format/Structure	Format/Structure excellent	Format/Structure	Format/Structure	Format/Structure poor
Relevance to the conference theme	Relevance to the conference theme excellent	Relevance to the conference theme	Relevance to the conference theme	Relevance to the conference theme poor
Artistic performances	Artistic performances excellent	Artistic performances	Artistic performances	Artistic performances poor
Space for discussion	Space for discussion excellent	Space for discussion	Space for discussion	Space for discussion poor

Question Title

* 6. How relevant were the parallel sessions to your work?

	extremely relevant	somewhat relevant	neutral	not relevant
Session 1: Young people and Islamic radicalisation in Europe	Session 1: Young people and Islamic radicalisation in Europe extremely relevant	Session 1: Young people and Islamic radicalisation in Europe somewhat relevant	Session 1: Young people and Islamic radicalisation in Europe neutral	Session 1: Young people and Islamic radicalisation in Europe not relevant
Session 2: Building trust in communities: a catalyst for social justice	Session 2: Building trust in communities: a catalyst for social justice extremely relevant	Session 2: Building trust in communities: a catalyst for social justice somewhat relevant	Session 2: Building trust in communities: a catalyst for social justice neutral	Session 2: Building trust in communities: a catalyst for social justice not relevant
Session 3: Can new financial instruments build a bridge of trust between private funding, civil society and the public sector?	Session 3: Can new financial instruments build a bridge of trust between private funding, civil society and the public sector? extremely relevant	Session 3: Can new financial instruments build a bridge of trust between private funding, civil society and the public sector? somewhat relevant	Session 3: Can new financial instruments build a bridge of trust between private funding, civil society and the public sector? neutral	Session 3: Can new financial instruments build a bridge of trust between private funding, civil society and the public sector? not relevant

Question Title

* 7. Was there any issue or topic that you would have liked to see on EuroPhilantopics this year?

Question Title

* 8. In general, how would you rate the following aspects of parallel breakout session 1- Young people and Islamic radicalisation in Europe?

	Excellent			Poor
Speakers	Speakers Excellent	Speakers	Speakers	Speakers Poor
Moderator	Moderator Excellent	Moderator	Moderator	Moderator Poor
Format/ Structure	Format/ Structure Excellent	Format/ Structure	Format/ Structure	Format/ Structure Poor
Relevance to the conference theme	Relevance to the conference theme Excellent	Relevance to the conference theme	Relevance to the conference theme	Relevance to the conference theme Poor
Space for discussion	Space for discussion Excellent	Space for discussion	Space for discussion	Space for discussion Poor

Comments/Suggestions

Question Title

* 9. In general, how would you rate the following aspects of parallel breakout session 2 - Building trust in communities: a catalyst for social justice?

	excellent			poor
Speakers	Speakers excellent	Speakers	Speakers	Speakers poor
Moderator	Moderator excellent	Moderator	Moderator	Moderator poor
Format/ Structure	Format/ Structure excellent	Format/ Structure	Format/ Structure	Format/ Structure poor
Relevance to the conference theme	Relevance to the conference theme excellent	Relevance to the conference theme	Relevance to the conference theme	Relevance to the conference theme poor
Space for discussion	Space for discussion excellent	Space for discussion	Space for discussion	Space for discussion poor

Comments/Suggestions

Question Title

* 10. In general, how would you rate the following aspects of parallel breakout session 3 -Can new financial instruments build a bridge of trust between private funding, civil society and the public sector?

	excellent			poor
Speakers	Speakers excellent	Speakers	Speakers	Speakers poor
Moderator	Moderator excellent	Moderator	Moderator	Moderator poor
Format/ Structure	Format/ Structure excellent	Format/ Structure	Format/ Structure	Format/ Structure poor
Relevance to the conference theme	Relevance to the conference theme excellent	Relevance to the conference theme	Relevance to the conference theme	Relevance to the conference theme poor
Space for discussion	Space for discussion excellent	Space for discussion	Space for discussion	Space for discussion poor

Comments/Suggestions

Question Title

* 11. Did any aspects of EuroPhilantopics stand out as particularly good? If so, which ones and why?

Question Title

* 12. Were there any aspects of EuroPhilantopics which stand out as particularly bad or need improving?

Question Title

* 13. How can we improve EuroPhilantopics for next year time? Would you like more interview style plenaries and breakout sessions? Should we try to ensure that there is a good spread and balance of foundations, wider civil society organisations and policymakers?

Question Title

* 14. In general, would you like to have had more or less of the following:

	More	Same amount	Less	NA
Dialogue with policymakers	Dialogue with policymakers More	Dialogue with policymakers Same amount	Dialogue with policymakers Less	Dialogue with policymakers NA
Small group conversations	Small group conversations More	Small group conversations Same amount	Small group conversations Less	Small group conversations NA
Networking opportunities	Networking opportunities More	Networking opportunities Same amount	Networking opportunities Less	Networking opportunities NA

Question Title

* 15. What would make you come to EuroPhilantopics again next year?

Question Title

* 16. What would you like featured next year, is there a particular issue or theme that you think we should focus on?

Thank you!