2019 NNECOS Spring Meeting Innovations in Cancer Care

QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION: (if multiple presenters, evaluate the following for each speaker/presenter individually)

Question Title

* 1. RADIATION ONCOLOGY - FROM STIMULATION TO TREATMENT (.75) - Chris Anker, MD

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Knowledge of Subject	Knowledge of Subject Excellent	Knowledge of Subject Good	Knowledge of Subject Fair	Knowledge of Subject Poor
Organization and clarity of content	Organization and clarity of content Excellent	Organization and clarity of content Good	Organization and clarity of content Fair	Organization and clarity of content Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods	Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent	Effectiveness of teaching methods Good	Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair	Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor

HOLISTIC CARE OF PATIENTS: THE MANY FACETS OF CARING FOR AND CO-MANAGING PATIENTS WITH RECTAL CANCER (.75)

Question Title

* 2. Carol S. Walsh, MS, CGC

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Knowledge of Subject	Knowledge of Subject Excellent	Knowledge of Subject Good	Knowledge of Subject Fair	Knowledge of Subject Poor
Organization and clarity of content	Organization and clarity of content Excellent	Organization and clarity of content Good	Organization and clarity of content Fair	Organization and clarity of content Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods	Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent	Effectiveness of teaching methods Good	Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair	Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor

Question Title

* 3. Kacie Merchand, MS, RD, CSO, LD

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Knowledge of Subject	Knowledge of Subject Excellent	Knowledge of Subject Good	Knowledge of Subject Fair	Knowledge of Subject Poor
Organization and clarity of content	Organization and clarity of content Excellent	Organization and clarity of content Good	Organization and clarity of content Fair	Organization and clarity of content Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods	Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent	Effectiveness of teaching methods Good	Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair	Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor

Question Title

* 4. Karen Willett BSN, RN, OCN

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Knowledge of Subject	Knowledge of Subject Excellent	Knowledge of Subject Good	Knowledge of Subject Fair	Knowledge of Subject Poor
Organization and clarity of content	Organization and clarity of content Excellent	Organization and clarity of content Good	Organization and clarity of content Fair	Organization and clarity of content Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods	Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent	Effectiveness of teaching methods Good	Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair	Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor

Question Title

* 5. PATIENT PERSPECTIVE PANEL: OUR JOURNEY (.75) - Patient Panelists

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Knowledge of Subject	Knowledge of Subject Excellent	Knowledge of Subject Good	Knowledge of Subject Fair	Knowledge of Subject Poor
Organization and clarity of content	Organization and clarity of content Excellent	Organization and clarity of content Good	Organization and clarity of content Fair	Organization and clarity of content Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods	Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent	Effectiveness of teaching methods Good	Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair	Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor

INNOVATIVE ABSTRACTS: PODIUM PRESENTATIONS (.75)

Question Title

* 6. A Guided Web-Based Yoga Series for Pediatric Cancer Survivors - Andrew Chongaway, DPT student and Aly Deardorff, SPT

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Knowledge of Subject	Knowledge of Subject Excellent	Knowledge of Subject Good	Knowledge of Subject Fair	Knowledge of Subject Poor
Organization and clarity of content	Organization and clarity of content Excellent	Organization and clarity of content Good	Organization and clarity of content Fair	Organization and clarity of content Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods	Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent	Effectiveness of teaching methods Good	Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair	Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor

Question Title

* 7. Review of time to treatment for head and neck cancer patients at a rural Maine cancer center - Adam Curtis, MS

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Knowledge of Subject	Knowledge of Subject Excellent	Knowledge of Subject Good	Knowledge of Subject Fair	Knowledge of Subject Poor
Organization and clarity of content	Organization and clarity of content Excellent	Organization and clarity of content Good	Organization and clarity of content Fair	Organization and clarity of content Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods	Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent	Effectiveness of teaching methods Good	Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair	Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor

Question Title

* 8. Neutropenic Diet: Standardizing the Practice Using Evidence-Based Practice - Mary Kate Visnic, RN

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Knowledge of Subject	Knowledge of Subject Excellent	Knowledge of Subject Good	Knowledge of Subject Fair	Knowledge of Subject Poor
Organization and clarity of content	Organization and clarity of content Excellent	Organization and clarity of content Good	Organization and clarity of content Fair	Organization and clarity of content Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods	Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent	Effectiveness of teaching methods Good	Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair	Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor

Question Title

* 9. ONCOLOGY 2019 UPDATE (.75) - Paul S. Unger, MD

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Knowledge of Subject	Knowledge of Subject Excellent	Knowledge of Subject Good	Knowledge of Subject Fair	Knowledge of Subject Poor
Organization and clarity of content	Organization and clarity of content Excellent	Organization and clarity of content Good	Organization and clarity of content Fair	Organization and clarity of content Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods	Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent	Effectiveness of teaching methods Good	Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair	Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor

Question Title

* 10. CLINICAL RESEARCH NURSING: A CRITICAL RESOURCE FOR IMPACTFUL HUMAN RESEARCH (1.0) - Sheila B. Noone, PhD, MPH, RN

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Knowledge of Subject	Knowledge of Subject Excellent	Knowledge of Subject Good	Knowledge of Subject Fair	Knowledge of Subject Poor
Organization and clarity of content	Organization and clarity of content Excellent	Organization and clarity of content Good	Organization and clarity of content Fair	Organization and clarity of content Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods	Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent	Effectiveness of teaching methods Good	Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair	Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor

Question Title

* 11. USING HUMOR IN CANCER TREATMENT WORKSHOP (1.0) - Josie Leavitt

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Knowledge of Subject	Knowledge of Subject Excellent	Knowledge of Subject Good	Knowledge of Subject Fair	Knowledge of Subject Poor
Organization and clarity of content	Organization and clarity of content Excellent	Organization and clarity of content Good	Organization and clarity of content Fair	Organization and clarity of content Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods	Effectiveness of teaching methods Excellent	Effectiveness of teaching methods Good	Effectiveness of teaching methods Fair	Effectiveness of teaching methods Poor

LEARNING OUTCOMES: (if multiple outcomes, evaluate the following for each outcome individually)
As a result of this activity, I was/will be able to

Question Title

* 12. Support opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration and communication in the care of the cancer patient:

Yes

If no, please explain:

Question Title

* 13. Describe the role of clinical research nursing:

Yes

If no, please explain:

Question Title

* 14. Define the role of the nurse in health care legislation as it relates to the provision of and payment of oncologic care:

Yes

If no, please explain:

Question Title

* 15. Apply knowledge of survivorship care of the patient with rectal cancer:

Yes

If no, please explain:

Question Title

* 16. Discuss the importance of the interdisciplinary care and co-management of the rectal cancer patient:

Yes

If no, please explain:

Question Title

* 17. Apply knowledge of treating cancer with radiation, from simulation to treatment:

Yes

If no, please explain:

Question Title

* 18. Employ new skills in using humor in communication with cancer patients:

Yes

If no, please explain:

Question Title

* 19. Were the presentation(s) free from commercial bias?

Yes

If no, please explain:

Question Title

* 20. As a result of this activity, please share at least one action you will take to change your professional practice/ performance:

ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS:

Question Title

* 21. Please check the administrative arrangements as satisfactory or unsatisfactory

	Satisfactory	Unsatisfactory
Promotional information provided adequate information	Promotional information provided adequate information Satisfactory	Promotional information provided adequate information Unsatisfactory
Registration process was efficient	Registration process was efficient Satisfactory	Registration process was efficient Unsatisfactory
Scheduling of the activity met my needs	Scheduling of the activity met my needs Satisfactory	Scheduling of the activity met my needs Unsatisfactory

Question Title

* 22. General comments about the program:

Question Title

* 23. Suggestions for future program topics:

Question Title

* 24. Are you interested in participating in free NNECOS sponsored educational webinars?

Question Title

* 25. Would the availability of CNE credit impact your interest in participating?

Question Title

* 26. What time of day would be best:

7:00am

12:00pm

3:00pm

5:00pm

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 27. What day of the week would be best?

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Saturday

Sunday

Question Title

* 28. What topics would be of interest?

Optional Personal Information (required for CNE credit):

Question Title

* 29. Name/Title

Question Title

* 30. Email:

Question Title

* 31. Specialty Degree:

Question Title

* 32. Practice/Organization:

Question Title

* 33. Address

Address

Address 2

City/Town

State/Province

ZIP/Postal Code

Question Title

* 34. I certify that I have participated in the above evaluated educational activities and request that I be awarded the following CNEs.

Question Title

* 35. Signature (enter initials)

Question Title

* 36. Yes! Please enter me into a drawing for a complimentary 2019 Annual Meeting registration

Yes

Thank you for participating! We hope to see you at a future meeting.