Fall 2024 NNECOS OCN Review Course EVALUATION

Care Continuum (1.0) - Angel Francini, BSN, RN, OCN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION: (if multiple presenters, evaluate the following for each speaker/presenter individually) 
Oncology Nursing Practice (1.0) - Carissa Morton, RN, BSN, OCN, BMTCN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
What Is: Treatment Modalities - A Jeoparty Game with Group Discussion - (1.5) Kori Field, MSN, RN, OCN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Symptom Management and Palliative Care (1.5) - Lynda Lee Lapan, MSN, APRN, FNP-BC, AOCNP
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Oncologic Emergencies (1.0) - Melissa R. Pomeroy, MSN, RN, CNL, OCN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Psychosocial Dimensions of Care (1.0) - Elizabeth B. McGrath, DNP, AGACNP-BC, AOCNP, ACHPN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
The learning outcome(s) for this activity were met:
Yes
No
The learner will self-identify at least three personal learning gaps requiring further study prior to taking the OCN exam
The learner will self-report improved preparedness to take the OCN exam
I found this activity worthwhile for my professional practice.
This activity will enhance my knowledge/skill /practice as a health care provider.
As a result of this activity, please share at least one action you will take to change your professional practice/ performance:
Were the presentation(s) free from commercial bias?
General comments about the program:
Suggestions for future program topics:
Administrative Arrangements: Please check the administrative arrangements as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. 
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Promotional information provided adequate information
Promotional information provided adequate information
Scheduling of the activity met my needs
Optional Personal Information (required for CNE credit):
Name/Title
Email:
Specialty Degree:
Practice/Organization:
Address
I certify that I have participated in the above evaluated educational activities and request that I be awarded the following CNEs (max 7.0).
Signature (enter initials)
Thank you for participating! We hope to see you at a future meeting.