NNECOS 2024 Annual Meeting & Palliative Care Symposium for Social Workers

Name:(Required.)
Credentials
Practice/Organization
Email:
Palliative Care Symposium - Geriatric Considerations in Palliative Care
QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION: (if multiple presenters, evaluate the following for each speaker/presenter individually) 
Session #1 - Are Geriatric Considerations in Palliative Care a Fallacy? (1 hour)
Sarah H. Kagan PhD, RN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Session #2 - Unlocking Secrets: Hidden Gems and Clinical Pearls (not for credit)
Germine Soliman, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Cosmina Fachiol, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Molly Bacon, PharmD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Jon Jehle, NP, ACHPN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Annual Meeting - Friday
Session #4- Drivers of Health in Northern New England - Community Context Driving Cancer Outcomes (1 hour)
Sally Kraft, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Andrew P. Loehrer, MD, MPH
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Session #3 - Advancing Access and Equity in Hematology: Addressing Barriers to
Care Through Patient Navigation and Multidisciplinary Care (1 hour)
Ludmila Svoboda, RN, BSN, MA, MSN, OCN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Paula Aguilera, RN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Kidest Mequanent, MHA
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Manisha Fleurisme, Patient Navigator
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Lachelle Weeks, MD, PhD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Julia A. Toro, RN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Session #5 - Breakout A - Putting the “Person” in “Personalized Medicine" - (not for credit)
Jens Rueter, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Christine Walko, PharmD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Session #5 - Breakout B - The Value of Cancer Rehabilitation across the Cancer Journey (1 hour)
Teresa Fitzpatrick, PT, MBA
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Session #6 - Preserving the Bone Matrix: Fracture Protection Throughout Cancer Treatment (not for credit)
Jennifer J. Kelly, DO
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Session #7 - Podium Presentations (not for credit)
Margaret Gray, MD, MS - Viral Hepatitis Screening Prior to Initiation of Immunosuppressive Agents for Treatment of Oncologic and Hematologic Malignancies
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Marie Anne Christine Buteau, MD - Neoadjuvant ArOMatase Inhibitor therapy for ER+ Breast Cancer, the NAOMI trial.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Ryan Thomas, MD - Risk Factors for Venous Thrombosis after Discharge from Medical Hospitalizations: The Medical Inpatient Thrombosis and Hemostasis (MITH) Study
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Annual Meeting - Saturday
SATURDAY

Session #8 - Steven M. Grunberg, MD Memorial Keynote: Breast Cancer in Older Women: Optimizing Treatment Decisions (1 hour)

Hyman B. Muss, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Session #9 - Tides, Storms, and Changing Shorelines: Reflecting on our Lives in Medicine (1 hour)
Kathryn Kirkland, MD, FAAHPM
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Session #10-Prostate Cancer Tumor Board: So Many Options, Where Do We Start? (not for credit)
Richard Lee, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Jens Rueter, MD


Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Christine Walko, PharmD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Lawrnece Dagrosa, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Nataniel Lester-Coll, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Session #11 - Clearing the Air: Cannabis in Patients with Cancer (1.75 hours)
Lisa M. Holle, PharmD, BCOP, FHOPA, FISOPP
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
CROSS-MEETING QUESTIONS
Were the presentation(s) free from commercial bias?
PROGRAM OUTCOME
As a result of this activity, I have an increase in knowledge to keep up with current trends in oncology
As a result of this activity, please share at least one action you will take to change your professional practice/ performance:
ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS:
Please check the administrative arrangements as satisfactory or unsatisfactory 
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Promotional information provided adequate information
Registration process was efficient
Scheduling of the activity met my needs
General comments about the program:
Suggestions for future program topics:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: 
What topics/changes would you recommend to make this activity a more meaningful educational experience?
Please make suggestions for future meetings:
What is the most important benefit that NNECOS provides you?
Please tell us one activity/goal that you would like NNECOS to pursue:
Thank you for participating! We hope to see you at a future meeting.