Skip to content
NNECOS 2023 Annual Meeting & Palliative Care Symposium
*
Name:
(Required.)
Credentials
Practice/Organization
Email:
Palliative Care Symposium
QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION:
(if multiple presenters, evaluate the following for each speaker/presenter individually)
Session #1 - Telehealth and Palliative Care (1.5 CNE)
Rebecca N. Hutchinson MD, MPH
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Christina Quinlan, BA
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Carrie C. Wu, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Perla Macip Rodriguez, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session #2 - Promoting Palliative Care via the Serious Illness Messaging Toolkit (.75 CNE)
Marian Grant DNP, ACNP-BC, ACHPN, FPCN, FAAN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session #3 - Managing Pain in Patients with Cancer and Opioid Use Disorder (1.0 CNE)
Megan Mitchell, PharmD, MS
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session #4 Emerging treatments in malignant hematology
James N. Gerson, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Yoni Resnick, PharmD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session #5 - Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Multi-Disciplinary Panel (1.5 CNE)
Puyao Li, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Rebecca Kwait, MD, FACS
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Kara Landry, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session #5 - Podium Presentations (1.0 CNE)
Natalie Bales, BS - Investigating Changes in Outcomes Involving Combined Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Immunotherapy in Patients with Brain Metastases
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Elizabeth B. McGrath, DNP, APRN, AGACNP-BC, AOCNP, ACHPN - From active treatment to surveillance: How the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Kara K. Landry, MD - Eliminating barriers to uptake of germline Genetic Testing for patients with Advanced Cancer: the GTAC study.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
SATURDAY
Session #6 - Healthcare Provider Resilience and Well-Being – Focusing our Conversation in the era of the pandemic and beyond (1.0 CNE)
Darshan Mehta, MD, MPH
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session #7 - Grunberg Keynote: Leptomeningeal Metastasis and CSF Analyses - (1.0 CNE)
Adrienne Boire, M.D., Ph.D.
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session #8 - Brain Metastases Tumor Board Panel (2.0 CNE)
Christine Lu-Emerson, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Chris Anker, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Jaina Clough, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Nathan E. Simmons, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Session #9 - Survivorship Symposium (2.5 CNE)
The Evolution of Survivorship Care - Amy Litterini, DPT
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
The Evolution of Survivorship Care - Elizabeth Dennis, DO
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
When Your Provider is a Survivor - Patient Panel - Tom, Joseph, Jamie, Nicholas, Devon
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of Subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
CROSS-MEETING QUESTIONS
Were the presentation(s) free from commercial bias?
Yes
No
If no, please explain:
PROGRAM OUTCOME
As a result of this activity, I have an increase in knowledge and skills to keep up with current trends in oncology
Yes
No
Other (please specify)
As a result of this activity, please share at least one action you will take to change your professional practice/ performance:
ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS:
Please check the administrative arrangements as satisfactory or unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Promotional information provided adequate information
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Registration process was efficient
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Scheduling of the activity met my needs
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
General comments about the program:
Suggestions for future program topics:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
What topics/changes would you recommend to make this activity a more meaningful educational experience?
Please make suggestions for future meetings:
What is the most important benefit that NNECOS provides you?
Please tell us one activity/goal that you would like NNECOS to pursue:
Thank you for participating! We hope to see you at a future meeting.