2018 Orthopaedic Winter Meeting: Saturday Speaker Evaluations

If you wish to receive credit for this session, please complete this evaluation and CME attestation form, including your name and email address at the end. Your input is greatly appreciated and allows us to better meet your educational needs. Thank you!

Question Title

* 1. Tannoury - Cervical Myelopathy.

Objectives:
Participants will be able to recall the history, physical exam findings, and imaging of patients with cervical myelopathy.

Participants will be able to identify indications for treatment.

Participants will be able to recognize current non-operative and operative treatment options for patients presenting with cervical myelopathy.

Speaker Evaluation Rating: 1 - Poor 2 - Fair 3 - Good 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent

	1	2	3	4	5
Presentation Skills	Presentation Skills 1	Presentation Skills 2	Presentation Skills 3	Presentation Skills 4	Presentation Skills 5
Knowledge of topic	Knowledge of topic 1	Knowledge of topic 2	Knowledge of topic 3	Knowledge of topic 4	Knowledge of topic 5
Quality of handout	Quality of handout 1	Quality of handout 2	Quality of handout 3	Quality of handout 4	Quality of handout 5
Quality of audio/visuals	Quality of audio/visuals 1	Quality of audio/visuals 2	Quality of audio/visuals 3	Quality of audio/visuals 4	Quality of audio/visuals 5
Overall impression	Overall impression 1	Overall impression 2	Overall impression 3	Overall impression 4	Overall impression 5

Question Title

* 2. Comments on this lecture:

Question Title

* 3. Arciero - Latarjet Technique and Complications.

Objectives:
Participants will identify indications for Latarjet.

Participants will recognize the technique of the open Latarjet.

Participants will be able to recall the unique complications of open Latarjet.

Speaker Evaluation Rating: 1 - Poor 2 - Fair 3 - Good 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent

	1	2	3	4	5
Presentation Skills	Presentation Skills 1	Presentation Skills 2	Presentation Skills 3	Presentation Skills 4	Presentation Skills 5
Knowledge of topic	Knowledge of topic 1	Knowledge of topic 2	Knowledge of topic 3	Knowledge of topic 4	Knowledge of topic 5
Quality of handout	Quality of handout 1	Quality of handout 2	Quality of handout 3	Quality of handout 4	Quality of handout 5
Quality of audio/visuals	Quality of audio/visuals 1	Quality of audio/visuals 2	Quality of audio/visuals 3	Quality of audio/visuals 4	Quality of audio/visuals 5
Overall impression	Overall impression 1	Overall impression 2	Overall impression 3	Overall impression 4	Overall impression 5

Question Title

* 4. Comments on this lecture:

Question Title

* 5. Stein - Scaphoid Fractures & Non-Unions.

Objectives:
Participants will be able to identify the best treatment options for acute scaphoid fractures.

Participants will be able to identify the best treatment options for chronic scaphoid fractures.

Participants will be able to recall salvage options for failed scaphoid fracture arthritis secondary to SNAC deformities.

Speaker Evaluation Rating: 1 - Poor 2 - Fair 3 - Good 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent

	1	2	3	4	5
Presentation Skills	Presentation Skills 1	Presentation Skills 2	Presentation Skills 3	Presentation Skills 4	Presentation Skills 5
Knowledge of topic	Knowledge of topic 1	Knowledge of topic 2	Knowledge of topic 3	Knowledge of topic 4	Knowledge of topic 5
Quality of handout	Quality of handout 1	Quality of handout 2	Quality of handout 3	Quality of handout 4	Quality of handout 5
Quality of audio/visuals	Quality of audio/visuals 1	Quality of audio/visuals 2	Quality of audio/visuals 3	Quality of audio/visuals 4	Quality of audio/visuals 5
Overall impression	Overall impression 1	Overall impression 2	Overall impression 3	Overall impression 4	Overall impression 5

Question Title

* 6. Comments on this lecture:

Question Title

* 7. Wixted - Proximal Humerus Fractures: Which Ones I Fix and How.

Objectives:
Participants will be able to recall the history, physical exam findings, and imaging of patients with proximal humerus fractures.

Participants will be able to identify indications for treatment and which types of cases will have the best outcomes from repair based on fracture presentation.

Participants will be able to recognize current non-operative and operative treatment options for patients presenting with proximal humerus fractures.

Speaker Evaluation Rating: 1 - Poor 2 - Fair 3 - Good 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent

	1	2	3	4	5
Presentation Skills	Presentation Skills 1	Presentation Skills 2	Presentation Skills 3	Presentation Skills 4	Presentation Skills 5
Knowledge of topic	Knowledge of topic 1	Knowledge of topic 2	Knowledge of topic 3	Knowledge of topic 4	Knowledge of topic 5
Quality of handout	Quality of handout 1	Quality of handout 2	Quality of handout 3	Quality of handout 4	Quality of handout 5
Quality of audio/visuals	Quality of audio/visuals 1	Quality of audio/visuals 2	Quality of audio/visuals 3	Quality of audio/visuals 4	Quality of audio/visuals 5
Overall impression	Overall impression 1	Overall impression 2	Overall impression 3	Overall impression 4	Overall impression 5

Question Title

* 8. Comments on this lecture:

Question Title

* 9. DeAngelis - Quadriceps Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction.

Objectives:
Participants will be able to describe the role of auto- and allograft in ACL reconstruction based on patient age.

Participants will be able to recall the advantages and disadvantages of autograft options.

Participants will be able to recognize the relevant anatomy for quadriceps tendon harvesting.

Speaker Evaluation Rating: 1 - Poor 2 - Fair 3 - Good 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent

	1	2	3	4	5
Presentation Skills	Presentation Skills 1	Presentation Skills 2	Presentation Skills 3	Presentation Skills 4	Presentation Skills 5
Knowledge of topic	Knowledge of topic 1	Knowledge of topic 2	Knowledge of topic 3	Knowledge of topic 4	Knowledge of topic 5
Quality of handout	Quality of handout 1	Quality of handout 2	Quality of handout 3	Quality of handout 4	Quality of handout 5
Quality of audio/visuals	Quality of audio/visuals 1	Quality of audio/visuals 2	Quality of audio/visuals 3	Quality of audio/visuals 4	Quality of audio/visuals 5
Overall impression	Overall impression 1	Overall impression 2	Overall impression 3	Overall impression 4	Overall impression 5

Question Title

* 10. Comments on this lecture:

FOR THE OVERALL PROGRAM

Meeting overall:
1. Update and improve patient care based on concepts and skills presented.
2. Discuss key concepts with colleagues.
3. Understand expected outcomes from various approaches to management.

Question Title

* 11. Did the program meet the stated objectives?

Yes

N/A

Question Title

* 12. Will this activity influence your practice?

Yes

N/A

Question Title

* 13. Will this activity impact your patient outcomes?

Yes

N/A

Question Title

* 14. What are you going to do differently after attending this educational activity?

Question Title

* 15. Will this activity enhance your competence? If yes, list examples below:

Yes

N/A

Question Title

* 16. List examples

Question Title

* 17. If this activity had commercial support, was this information provided?

Yes

N/A

Question Title

* 18. Was the presentation free from commercial/personal bias for or against a product and/or company? If no, what was the bias?

Yes

N/A

Question Title

* 19. If bias, please explain

Question Title

* 20. Rate the following on a scale of : 1 - Poor 2 - Fair 3 - Good 4 - Very Good 5 - Excellent

	1	2	3	4	5
Conference materials (handouts/audio visuals)	Conference materials (handouts/audio visuals) 1	Conference materials (handouts/audio visuals) 2	Conference materials (handouts/audio visuals) 3	Conference materials (handouts/audio visuals) 4	Conference materials (handouts/audio visuals) 5
Facilities (comfort, atmosphere, ability to see and hear)	Facilities (comfort, atmosphere, ability to see and hear) 1	Facilities (comfort, atmosphere, ability to see and hear) 2	Facilities (comfort, atmosphere, ability to see and hear) 3	Facilities (comfort, atmosphere, ability to see and hear) 4	Facilities (comfort, atmosphere, ability to see and hear) 5
Quality and appropriateness of presenter's teaching methods	Quality and appropriateness of presenter's teaching methods 1	Quality and appropriateness of presenter's teaching methods 2	Quality and appropriateness of presenter's teaching methods 3	Quality and appropriateness of presenter's teaching methods 4	Quality and appropriateness of presenter's teaching methods 5
Value of topics	Value of topics 1	Value of topics 2	Value of topics 3	Value of topics 4	Value of topics 5

Question Title

* 21. Strengths of this activity and comments:

Question Title

* 22. Recommendations for future activities:

Question Title

* 23. Information

First Name

Last name

Credentials

Email

Question Title

* 24. Address (Required to enter for at least one of the two sessions)

Company

Address

City/Town

State/Province

ZIP/Postal Code

Question Title

* 25. ATTESTATION: Of 3 Category 1 CME available for this session, please enter the number below that attest/claim for this activity.

Question Title

* 26. Signature (Typing a signature is accepted)

NH Musculoskeletal Institute is accredited by the New Hampshire Medical Society Council on Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the essential areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education. The NH Musculoskeletal Institute designates this live activity for a maximum of 3 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of his/her participation in the activity.

Attendees from other professions will receive a certificate of attendance.

Board of Certification: NHMI (BOC AP#: P966) is approved by the Board of Certification, Inc. to provide continuing education to Athletic Trainers. This program is eligible for a maximum of 3 Category A hours/CEUs. ATs should claim only those hours spent in the educational program.