NESTcc Landscape Analysis Post-Workshop Questionnaire

Thank you for attending the Opportunities and Gaps in Real-World Evidence for Medical Devices expert workshop on Wednesday, April 26, 2017. We hope you found the discussion to be both stimulating and useful.

We are sharing this questionnaire to collect any additional thoughts from the workshop’s discussion to help the National Evaluation System for health Technology Coordinating Center (NESTcc) in its activities. We appreciate your feedback and the information you provide will be used exclusively to benefit the continued development of both the landscape analysis and NESTcc. All responses will be kept confidential by MDIC and Deloitte Consulting, LLP.

Question Title

* 1. Please select the stakeholder category most applicable to you.

Clinician

Health system

Payer

Federal representative

Medical device expert

Patient representative

Health information technology

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 2. Optional: Please provide your name and contact information.

Question Title

* 3. Does the landscape analysis provide information that can be used in your current organization’s efforts around medical device development or performance monitoring?

Yes

Please describe how you or your organization may use the information in the landscape analysis to change or support current activities.

Question Title

* 4. Do you have any case studies that you would like to share with the NESTcc for inclusion in the Heat Map and RWE Case Study Catalog? If yes, please email to NESTLandscape@mdic.org.

Yes

If yes, please provide your contact information for follow-up.

Question Title

* 5. As NESTcc works to revise the interim landscape analysis, are there gaps in the document that were not discussed during the workshop that you feel should be addressed?

Yes

Please list which gap areas you believe need further discussion.

Question Title

* 6. The heat map is oriented around the expanded total product life cycle (x-axis) and device areas derived from divisions within the FDA Office of Device Evaluation (y-axis). Are these the appropriate axes for the heat map?

Yes

If no, please provide a brief description of other suggestions for heat map axes.

Question Title

* 7. Please rank the value propositions of RWE from most applicable to least applicable.

Improved medical devices

Faster development times

Cost-savings

Better clinical decision-making

Data transparency

General benefit to public health

Question Title

* 8. Please list any value propositions of RWE that are relevant to you, which were not listed in Question 7.

Question Title

* 9. What activities or initiatives would you like to see from NESTcc in the future? Please describe any activities, priority areas, or initiatives of interest to you.