Skip to content

CJA Panel: Artificial Intelligence and Anesthesiology Research: Balancing Innovations, Risks, and Responsibilities

June 6, 2026, 2:45 pm - 4:15 pm
-----------------------------------------
Learning Objectives:
  1. Summarize the use of AI in anesthesiology research, with tips and tricks for how to evaluate AI research findings.
  2. Examine the limitations and societal impact of AI models, and how you can set up AI in medicine for success.
  3. Analyze key differences in studying etiology vs prediction in the context of AI research.
1.Overall Session Evaluation
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The objectives were clearly stated 
The stated objectives were met 
I acquired new skills and/or knowledge
I was introduced to new perspectives on my current practice
The content was relevant to my learning needs
This session promoted interaction (i.e., Q&A, polling etc.)
2.This session encouraged me to consider changes to my practice
3.Which CanMEDS roles were addressed?
4.Moderator: Dr Stephan Schwarz
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The moderator was organized and managed the  session well
5.Moderator: Dr Phillip Jones
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The moderator was organized and managed the  session well
6.Speaker: Dr Leo Celi
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future
7.Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the speaker's presentation with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?
0
5
10
8.Speaker: Dr Pascal Laferriere-Langlois
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future
9.Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the speaker's presentation with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?
0
5
10
10.Speaker: Dr Janny Xue Chen Ke
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future
11.Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the speaker's presentation with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?
0
5
10
12.The session and presenter(s) were balanced and free from commercial bias
13.Please provide any additional comments or suggestions regarding this session, moderator(s), and speaker(s).
Thank you for completing the evaluation!