Public Survey

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires all states and local governments to have up-to-date hazard mitigation plans prepared and approved in order to maintain eligibility for certain FEMA funding assistance.  Mitigation planning is the process of identifying hazards to which jurisdictions are at risk as well as developing actions that will reduce or prevent damages from those hazards. 

Mitchell County's Emergency Management Agency is currently developing an update to the 2014 Mitchell County Mulit-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan with assistance from the North Iowa Area Council of Governments (NIACOG)The overall strategy of the Plan is to reduce the vulnerability of people and property in the planning area to the impacts of hazards.

One of the key components of a hazard mitigation plan is public input during the planning process. Public input from a jurisdiction must be conducted and shown within the Multi-Jurisdictional Plan in order for that jurisdiction to continue to be eligible for certain FEMA hazard mitigation funding.  For this public input, the County's Emergency Management is seeking your input on the types of activities that should be considered to reduce future impacts from hazards.  Your comments will be considered by your jurisdiction's representatives as the Plan is developed. 

Please take a few moments to complete the following as soon as possible. Consider the following when providing your opinion:
- Social: Will the action be acceptable to the community? Could it have an unfair effect on a particular segment of the population?
- Technical: Is the action technically feasible? Are there secondary impacts? Does it offer a long-term solution?
- Administrative: Are there adequate staffing, funding, and maintenance capabilities to implement the project?
- Political: Will there be adequate political and public support for the project?
- Legal: Does your jurisdiction have the legal authority to implement the action?
- Economic: Is the action cost-beneficial? Is there funding available? Will the action contribute to the local economy?
- Environmental: Will there be negative environmental consequences from the action? Does it comply with environmental regulations? Is it consistent with community environmental goals?

A public meeting to discuss the survey results for your community will be scheduled at a later date. Thank you for your participation.

Contact Kris Olson, Mitchell County Emergency Management Coordinator, at (641) 732-5872 or ema@mitchellcoia.us with any questions or comments.

Question Title

* 1. Please select your jurisdiction from the list below.  Only one jurisdiction can be selected for each survey.  If you would like to represent more than one jurisdiction in this list, please complete multiple surveys.

Question Title

* 2. FLOODING: Please indicate, in your opinion, the priority level of each flooding mitigation action to be used within YOUR JURISDICTION in the future.

  High Priority Moderate Priority Low Priority Does Not Apply
Develop local floodplain management plan and update it regularly
Stregthen Upper Cedar Watershed management
Develop stormwater committee that meets regularly and prepare and adopt stormwater drainage plan and ordinance
Use stream restoration to ensure adequate drainage and diversion of stormwater
Require floodplains be kept as open space
Develop a stream buffer ordinance to protect water resources
and limit flood impacts
Develop a dam failure study and emergency action plan
Use computer software to map areas that are at risk of flooding
Conduct NFIP community workshops to provide information
and incentives for property owners to acquire flood insurance
Enact and enforce regulations that exceed NFIP
minimum standards so that more flood protection is provided for
new development
Remove existing structures from flood hazard areas
Incorporate ice jam prevention techniques as appropriate
Raise utilities or other mechanical devices above expected
flood levels
Require that all critical facilities including emergency operations centers (EOC), police stations, and fire department facilities be located outside of flood-prone areas.
Build earthen dikes around flood-threatened critical facilities
Use vegetative management, such as vegetative buffers, around
streams and water sources
Protect and preserving wetlands to help prevent flooding
in other areas
Encourage homeowners to purchase flood insurance
Educate citizens about safety during flood conditions, including
the dangers of driving on flooded roads
Encourage homeowners to install backflow valves to prevent
reverse-flow flood damages
Educate the public about securing debris, propane tanks, yard
items, or stored objects that may otherwise be swept away,
damaged, or pose a hazard if picked up and washed away
by floodwaters
Asking residents to help keep storm drains clear of debris during
storms (not to rely solely on Public Works)
Address flooding and land use in updated Comprehensive Development Plan

Question Title

* 3. HAIL: Please indicate, in your opinion, the priority level of each hail mitigation action to be used within YOUR JURISDICTION in the future.

  High Priority Moderate Priority Low Priority Does Not Apply
Locate  safe rooms near houses to
prevent hail-induced injuries
Educate public on construction techniques to minimize hail damage (bracing, shutters, laminated glass, hail-resistant roof/siding etc)
Post warning signage at local parks, county fairs, and other
outdoor venues
Teach school children about the dangers of hail and how to take safety precautions

Question Title

* 4. LIGHTNING: Please indicate, in your opinion, the priority level of each lightning mitigation action to be used within YOUR JURISDICTION in the future.

  High Priority Moderate Priority Low Priority Does Not Apply
Instal lightning protection devices and methods, such as
lightning rods and grounding, on public infrastructure
and other critical facilities
Instal and maintain surge protection on critical
public electronic equipment
Post warning signage on lightning at local parks
Teach school children about the dangers of lightning and how
to take safety precautions

Question Title

* 5. SEVERE WIND: Please indicate, in your opinion, the priority level of each severe wind mitigation action to be used within YOUR JURISDICTION in the future.

  High Priority Moderate Priority Low Priority Does Not Apply
Review building codes and structural policies to ensure they are adequate to protect older structures and manufactured homes from wind damage.
Educate public on construction methods (new construction and retrofitting) to prevent wind damage on buildings
Increase amount of natural features to be used as wind buffers
Establish standards for all utilities regarding tree pruning
around lines.
Bury power lines to provide uninterrupted power after severe
winds, considering both maintenance and repair issues
Retrofit public buildings and critical facilities to reduce
future wind damage
Improve public awareness of severe wind through outreach activities

Question Title

* 6. SEVERE WINTER WEATHER: Please indicate, in your opinion, the priority level of each severe winter weather mitigation action to be used within YOUR JURISDICTION in the future.

  High Priority Moderate Priority Low Priority Does Not Apply
Educate public on building construction to handle heavy snow and extreme cold (protecting pipes)
Plan for and maintain better road and debris
clearing capabilities
Install snow fences or rows of trees to limit blowing and drifting snow over critical roadways
Organize outreach to vulnerable populations, including
establishing and promoting accessible heating centers in
the community.

Question Title

* 7. SINKHOLES/SUBSIDENCE: Please indicate, in your opinion, the priority level of each sinkhole/subsidence mitigation action to be used within YOUR JURISDICTION in the future.

  High Priority Moderate Priority Low Priority Does Not Apply
Use computer software to map areas that are susceptible to subsidence
Monitor areas at risk of subsidence
Promote community awareness of subsidence/sinkhole risks and impacts.

Question Title

* 8. TORNADO: Please indicate, in your opinion, the priority level of each tornado mitigation action to be used within YOUR JURISDICTION in the future.

  High Priority Moderate Priority Low Priority Does Not Apply
Plan for construction of safe rooms in schools, daycares, and nursing homes
Educate public on engineering measures and construction techniques to reduce impact of tornados
Provide new torando siren system
Increase outreach activities to increase awareness of tornado risk

Question Title

* 9. FIRE: Please indicate, in your opinion, the priority level of each fire mitigation action to be used within YOUR JURISDICTION in the future.

  High Priority Moderate Priority Low Priority Does Not Apply
Encourage safe disposal of yard and household waste rather than open burning
Encourage removal of dead or dry leaves, needles, twigs, and combustibles from roofs, decks, eaves, porches, and yards
Use local fire departments to conduct education programs
in schools
Encourage installation and maintenance of smoke detectors and fire extinguishers on each floor of homes or other buildings.

Question Title

* 10. EXTREME HEAT: Please indicate, in your opinion, the priority level of each extreme heat mitigation action to be used within YOUR JURISDICTION in the future.

  High Priority Moderate Priority Low Priority Does Not Apply
Increase tree plantings around buildings
and along public rights-of-way.
Encourage installation of green roofs, which provide shade and
remove heat from the roof surface and surrounding air.
Encourage cool roofing products that reflect sunlight and heat away from a building.
Educate citizens regarding the dangers of extreme heat
and the steps they can take to protect themselves when extreme
temperatures occur
Organize outreach to vulnerable populations, including
establishing and promoting accessible cooling center(s) in the community.

Question Title

* 11. Please comment on any other issue(s) that Mitchell County Emergency Management and elected officials in your jurisdiction should consider when developing a strategy to reduce future losses caused by hazard events. 

These issues might involve dam/infrastructure failure, transportation accidents, radiological events, infectious human disease, terrorism, civil unrest, drought, animal/plant/crop disease, and hazardous materials release.

T