Midwest Equity Meeting Survey 4.23.19

This form should take about 5 minutes to complete. Please review the meeting notes and answer the following questions. Thank you for providing us your feedback as it will further inform our learning/network of Midwest Funders. Please complete by Friday, May 3, 2019. Thank you.

	4 = Strongly Agree	3 = Agree	2 = Disagree	1 = Strongly Disagree
• Gained a deeper knowledge of funders interest in the Midwest	• Gained a deeper knowledge of funders interest in the Midwest 4 = Strongly Agree	• Gained a deeper knowledge of funders interest in the Midwest 3 = Agree	• Gained a deeper knowledge of funders interest in the Midwest 2 = Disagree	• Gained a deeper knowledge of funders interest in the Midwest 1 = Strongly Disagree
• A refresher or better analysis of diversity, equity and inclusion approaches in philanthropy	• A refresher or better analysis of diversity, equity and inclusion approaches in philanthropy 4 = Strongly Agree	• A refresher or better analysis of diversity, equity and inclusion approaches in philanthropy 3 = Agree	• A refresher or better analysis of diversity, equity and inclusion approaches in philanthropy 2 = Disagree	• A refresher or better analysis of diversity, equity and inclusion approaches in philanthropy 1 = Strongly Disagree
• Learned strategies, audiences and types of language to use internally to move resources towards equity	• Learned strategies, audiences and types of language to use internally to move resources towards equity 4 = Strongly Agree	• Learned strategies, audiences and types of language to use internally to move resources towards equity 3 = Agree	• Learned strategies, audiences and types of language to use internally to move resources towards equity 2 = Disagree	• Learned strategies, audiences and types of language to use internally to move resources towards equity 1 = Strongly Disagree
• Identified areas where your institution can work towards equity and inclusion	• Identified areas where your institution can work towards equity and inclusion 4 = Strongly Agree	• Identified areas where your institution can work towards equity and inclusion 3 = Agree	• Identified areas where your institution can work towards equity and inclusion 2 = Disagree	• Identified areas where your institution can work towards equity and inclusion 1 = Strongly Disagree
The meeting overall was well run (logistics, registration, materials)	The meeting overall was well run (logistics, registration, materials) 4 = Strongly Agree	The meeting overall was well run (logistics, registration, materials) 3 = Agree	The meeting overall was well run (logistics, registration, materials) 2 = Disagree	The meeting overall was well run (logistics, registration, materials) 1 = Strongly Disagree
The facilitators were clear and helped create the space for our work to continue strongly	The facilitators were clear and helped create the space for our work to continue strongly 4 = Strongly Agree	The facilitators were clear and helped create the space for our work to continue strongly 3 = Agree	The facilitators were clear and helped create the space for our work to continue strongly 2 = Disagree	The facilitators were clear and helped create the space for our work to continue strongly 1 = Strongly Disagree
The presentations were clear, helpful and engaging	The presentations were clear, helpful and engaging 4 = Strongly Agree	The presentations were clear, helpful and engaging 3 = Agree	The presentations were clear, helpful and engaging 2 = Disagree	The presentations were clear, helpful and engaging 1 = Strongly Disagree

4 = Strongly Agree

3 = Agree

2 = Disagree

1 = Strongly Disagree

• Gained a deeper knowledge of funders interest in the Midwest

• Gained a deeper knowledge of funders interest in the Midwest 4 = Strongly Agree

• Gained a deeper knowledge of funders interest in the Midwest 3 = Agree

• Gained a deeper knowledge of funders interest in the Midwest 2 = Disagree

• Gained a deeper knowledge of funders interest in the Midwest 1 = Strongly Disagree

• A refresher or better analysis of diversity, equity and inclusion approaches in philanthropy

• A refresher or better analysis of diversity, equity and inclusion approaches in philanthropy 4 = Strongly Agree

• A refresher or better analysis of diversity, equity and inclusion approaches in philanthropy 3 = Agree

• A refresher or better analysis of diversity, equity and inclusion approaches in philanthropy 2 = Disagree

• A refresher or better analysis of diversity, equity and inclusion approaches in philanthropy 1 = Strongly Disagree

• Learned strategies, audiences and types of language to use internally to move resources towards equity

• Learned strategies, audiences and types of language to use internally to move resources towards equity 4 = Strongly Agree

• Learned strategies, audiences and types of language to use internally to move resources towards equity 3 = Agree

• Learned strategies, audiences and types of language to use internally to move resources towards equity 2 = Disagree

• Learned strategies, audiences and types of language to use internally to move resources towards equity 1 = Strongly Disagree

• Identified areas where your institution can work towards equity and inclusion

• Identified areas where your institution can work towards equity and inclusion 4 = Strongly Agree

• Identified areas where your institution can work towards equity and inclusion 3 = Agree

• Identified areas where your institution can work towards equity and inclusion 2 = Disagree

• Identified areas where your institution can work towards equity and inclusion 1 = Strongly Disagree

The meeting overall was well run (logistics, registration, materials)

The meeting overall was well run (logistics, registration, materials) 4 = Strongly Agree

The meeting overall was well run (logistics, registration, materials) 3 = Agree

The meeting overall was well run (logistics, registration, materials) 2 = Disagree

The meeting overall was well run (logistics, registration, materials) 1 = Strongly Disagree

The facilitators were clear and helped create the space for our work to continue strongly

The facilitators were clear and helped create the space for our work to continue strongly 4 = Strongly Agree

The facilitators were clear and helped create the space for our work to continue strongly 3 = Agree

The facilitators were clear and helped create the space for our work to continue strongly 2 = Disagree

The facilitators were clear and helped create the space for our work to continue strongly 1 = Strongly Disagree

The presentations were clear, helpful and engaging

The presentations were clear, helpful and engaging 4 = Strongly Agree

The presentations were clear, helpful and engaging 3 = Agree

The presentations were clear, helpful and engaging 2 = Disagree

The presentations were clear, helpful and engaging 1 = Strongly Disagree

Midwest Equity Meeting Survey 4.23.19

Meeting Evaluation Form

Question Title

* 1. As a result of this meeting, I have:(Please choose one rating for each row.)

Question Title

* 2. The best aspects of the meeting were:

Question Title

* 3. The convening would have been better if:

Question Title

* 4. Please share any comments you have on developing a Midwest project that lifts up local, regional and state strategies.

Question Title

* 5. What ideas or areas of work would you like to do more learning together with other funders?

Question Title

* 6. Are there any request or additional feedback you have that will help us improve future conversations with funders invested in the Midwest?

Question Title

* 7. Contact information