Industry Stakeholder Survey: Fourth Casino Licence, Mpumalanga Province

Samba Solutions Inc. has been appointed by the Mpumalanga Economic Regulator (MER) to conduct a feasibility study on the potential fourth casino licence for Mpumalanga Province, under a formal MER mandate.
Our appointment may be verified through the official public notice published on the MER website.
This survey seeks input from a broad range of stakeholders whose activities may inform, support, supply, regulate, or be affected by a potential casino development. This includes stakeholders across the gambling, hospitality, tourism, property, infrastructure, transport, government, regulatory, community, investment and broader casino value-chain ecosystem.
The survey should take approximately 10 to 15 minutes to complete. Participation is voluntary, and you may withdraw at any time. You may respond anonymously, or provide your details if you are willing to be contacted for follow-up engagement.
Responses will be used solely for purposes of the feasibility study and will be reported in aggregate. No individual or organisation-specific response will be attributed without prior consent.
For queries, please contact the Samba Solutions project team at survey@sambasolution.co.za.
Section A: Respondent profile

Question Title

* 1. Your name (optional)

Question Title

* 2. Your organisation (optional)

Question Title

* 3. Which best describes your organisation? (required)

Question Title

* 4. Your role in the organisation

Question Title

* 5. Which local municipality of Mpumalanga does your organisation mainly operate in?

Question Title

* 6. How many years has your organisation operated in Mpumalanga?

If a question is outside your organisation's area, please select "Not relevant to my organisation".

Question Title

* 7. In your view, how strong is current demand for casino and gambling entertainment in Mpumalanga?

Question Title

* 8. Do you think the Mpumalanga casino market could support an additional (fourth) casino?

Question Title

* 9. How do you expect overall demand for casino gambling in the province to change over the next five years?

Question Title

* 10. How much has each of the following affected casino gambling in Mpumalanga in recent years?

  Strong negative effect Slight negative effect No real effect Slight positive effect Strong positive effect No opinion Not relevant to my organisation
Online betting
Sports betting
Limited Payout Machines
Economic conditions and disposable income
Changing entertainment preferences

Question Title

* 11. A fourth casino could either grow the total gambling market or mainly shift revenue between existing operators. Which is closer to your view?

Question Title

* 12. In your view, what would most determine whether a fourth casino succeeds? (select up to three)

Question Title

* 13. How would a fourth casino in the province affect your operation?

Question Title

* 14. How concerned are you about each of the following?

  Not concerned Slightly Moderately Very concerned No opinion Not relevant to my organisation
Loss of patrons to a new casino
Pressure on gaming revenue
Pressure on non-gaming revenue (food, entertainment)
Staff retention and competition for skills

Question Title

* 15. How would you describe your venue's current capacity utilisation?

Question Title

* 16. In your experience, what share of your patrons travel from outside your immediate area?

Question Title

* 17. How significant is online and mobile betting as a competitive pressure on your business?

Question Title

* 18. Any further comments on the competitive landscape or the impact of a fourth licence?

Question Title

* 19. How would you describe visitor demand in your area over the past three years?

Question Title

* 20. What is your establishment's typical occupancy or capacity utilisation?

Question Title

* 21. How seasonal is visitor demand in your area?

Question Title

* 22. Where do most of your visitors come from? (select all that apply)

Question Title

* 23. Would a casino integrated with a hotel and resort facilities benefit tourism in your area?

Question Title

* 24. How well do you think each of the following would support a tourism-integrated resort casino in your area?

  Very poorly Poorly Adequately Well Very well No opinion Not relevant to my organisation
Existing visitor volumes
Accommodation supply
Tourism attractions nearby
Transport and access
Conference, meetings and events demand

Question Title

* 25. Would a resort casino more likely complement or compete with your business?

Question Title

* 26. Any further comments on tourism and the proposed development?

Question Title

* 27. How well would a major casino or resort development align with your area's economic development priorities?

Question Title

* 28. How would you rate the readiness of infrastructure in your area to support a major development?

  Not ready Limited Adequate Good Excellent No opinion Not relevant to my organisation
Road network and access
Electricity supply
Water and sewerage
Telecommunications and broadband

Question Title

* 29. Is suitable, appropriately zoned land available in your area for a development of this kind?

Question Title

* 30. How significant would each of the following benefits be for your area?

  Not significant Slightly Moderately Very Extremely significant No opinion Not relevant to my organisation
Job creation
Tourism growth
Investment attraction
Municipal revenue
Skills development

Question Title

* 31. How significant would each of the following concerns be for your area?

  Not significant Slightly Moderately Very Extremely significant No opinion Not relevant to my organisation
Problem gambling and social harm
Pressure on infrastructure
Environmental impact
Community opposition

Question Title

* 32. Overall, would your organisation support the development of a fourth casino in the province?

Question Title

* 33. Any further comments on development readiness or local priorities?

Section F: Location and development model

Question Title

* 34. In your view, how suitable is each of the following areas for a new casino or resort development?

  Not suitable Slightly suitable Moderately suitable Highly suitable No opinion
City of Mbombela (Ehlanzeni)
Bushbuckridge (Ehlanzeni)
Nkomazi (Ehlanzeni)
Thaba Chweu (Ehlanzeni)
Emalahleni (Nkangala)
Steve Tshwete (Nkangala)
Thembisile Hani (Nkangala)
Dr JS Moroka (Nkangala)
Victor Khanye (Nkangala)
Emakhazeni (Nkangala)
Govan Mbeki (Gert Sibande)
Msukaligwa (Gert Sibande)
Dipaleseng (Gert Sibande)
Lekwa (Gert Sibande)
Mkhondo (Gert Sibande)
Dr Pixley Ka Isaka Seme (Gert Sibande)
Chief Albert Luthuli (Gert Sibande)

Question Title

* 35. What makes a location well suited to a fourth casino? Please explain briefly.

Question Title

* 36. Which development model do you believe would work best for a fourth casino in Mpumalanga?

Question Title

* 37. Please explain your choice of development model.

Question Title

* 38. How important is it that a fourth casino includes a strong online and digital component alongside the physical venue?

Section G: Closing

Question Title

* 39. Is there anything else you would like the study to consider?

Question Title

* 40. Would you be willing to be contacted for a brief follow-up discussion?

Question Title

* 41. If yes, please provide an email address for follow-up.

Thank you for taking part. Your input is a valuable contribution to this study. The findings will be reported to the Mpumalanga Economic Regulator in aggregate form.

If you have any questions, please contact the Samba Solutions project team at survey@sambasolution.co.za

T