Thank you for participating in GFBR! GFBR relies on feedback from participants to help shape its work. As such, we would be extremely grateful if you could spare 10 minutes to complete this survey. At the end of the survey you’ll be invited to say what topic you think GFBR should focus on next – we’d love to receive your input!
 
Please note that this survey is optional. The information you provide will be shared with the GFBR Steering and Planning Committees (set out below) so they can evaluate the format, content and impact of the GFBR meeting. 
 
Please note that this is an anonymous survey and we do not ask for your name. For free-text responses, please do not provide information that identifies and relates to you or anyone else.
 
GFBR Steering Committee
Katherine Littler, World Health Organization, Switzerland; Michael Parker, Oxford University, UK; Anna Chiumento, Liverpool University, UK; Teck Chuan Voo, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Phaik Yeong Cheah, Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Thailand; Sharon Kaur, University of Malaya, Malaysia; Anant Bhan, Yenepoya University, India;  Jantina De Vries, University of Cape Town, South Africa; Caesar Atuire, University of Ghana, Ghana; Ross Upshur, University of Toronto, Canada; Carla Saenz, Pan American Health Organisation, USA; Paul Ndebele, George Washington University, USA; Ana Palmero, WHO consultant, Argentina.
Funder member representatives: Rachel Knowles, UK Medical Research Council (MRC), UK; Barbara Sina, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, USA, Carleigh Krubiner, Wellcome, UK and Niresh Bhagwandin, South African MRC.
 
 
GFBR Planning Committee
Toto Gronlund, James Lind Alliance Adviser (National Institutes for Health Research, UK); Francis Kombe, EthiXPERT, Kenya; Joe Millum, University of St. Andrews; Mona Nasser, University of Plymouth, UK; Bridget Pratt, Australian Catholic University, Australia; Ludovic Reveiz, Pan American Health Organization, USA; Annette Rid, NIH Clinical Center & NIH Fogarty International Center, USA; Soumyadeep Bhaumik, The George Institute, India; Nicola Barsdorf, Stellenbosch University, South Africa Claudia Chamas, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Brazil.



Question Title

* 1. What region are you from?

Question Title

* 2. What stage in your career do you consider yourself?

Question Title

* 3. What is your area of expertise? e.g. bioethics, research priority setting, public health, policy

Question Title

* 4. What type of organisation do you primarily work for or study at? (select all that apply)

Question Title

* 5. To what extent do you agree with the following statement: “The GFBR is unique and different compared to other bioethics conferences or meetings.”

Question Title

* 6. Are there any alternative meetings that have the same, or similar functions?

Question Title

* 7. If you selected ‘Yes’ to the above, please list any similar meetings or conferences

Question Title

* 8. What are the main benefits to you of the GFBR?

Question Title

* 9. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the GFBR meeting?

Question Title

* 10. Please share any additional feedback on the quality of the GFBR here

Question Title

* 11. How would you rate the organisers' support and communication leading up to, and during GFBR?

Question Title

* 12. How would you rate the sessions?

  Very good Good Neither good nor bad Bad Very bad
Keynote presentation
Theme 1 - Reflections from three national research priority setting exercises: stakeholder inclusion, transparency and evidence
Theme 2 - Amplifying marginalized voices in research prioritisation: the James Lind Alliance approach
Theme 3 - Governance of research priority setting: the role and responsibility of government
Theme 4 - Ethical and practical challenges to research priority-setting
Funder panel
Breakout group discussions (all themes)
Pecha Kucha sessions

Question Title

* 13. Please use the space below to add any comments about the sessions in general.

Question Title

* 14. Has this GFBR led to, or is it likely to influence, any future networking or collaborations for you?

Question Title

* 15. If yes/maybe, please explain below

Question Title

* 16. Are you interested in pursuing a GFBR fellowship?

Question Title

* 17. If yes/maybe, please explain below

Question Title

* 18. Would you like to attend a future GFBR meeting?

Question Title

* 19. If you would like to attend a future GFBR meeting, what format would you prefer

Question Title

* 20. What topic(s) do you think GFBR should address at a future meeting?

Question Title

* 21. Please use this space to add any further comments 

T