Confidential MDedge | Clinical Outcomes Website Feedback

For U.S. Based Health Care Professionals Only

Please scroll down to complete your responses and click “Done” to finish:

Recently launched, MDedge.com/JCOMJournal is a one-stop destination for the practical, timely medical news, evidence-based reviews, and clinically relevant digital content you trust from the Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management, including videos, podcasts, quizzes, and more. If you are a U.S. based clinician, your confidential input is welcomed so we can continue to meet your evolving professional needs.

Question Title

* Compared to your favorite, go to website, how satisfied are you with the features and format of MDedge | Clinical Outcomes?

Not at all satisfied

Not very satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Very satisfied

Extremely satisfied

Not at all satisfied

Not very satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Very satisfied

Extremely satisfied

Question Title

* What do you like/dislike about the site?

Dislike

Question Title

* To the best of your ability, please candidly rate the site, on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = poor and 5 = excellent, in terms of the following features.

	Poor = 1	2	3	4	5 = Excellent
Overall user experience/navigation	Overall user experience/navigation Poor = 1	Overall user experience/navigation 2	Overall user experience/navigation 3	Overall user experience/navigation 4	Overall user experience/navigation 5 = Excellent
Content relevant to clinical practice	Content relevant to clinical practice Poor = 1	Content relevant to clinical practice 2	Content relevant to clinical practice 3	Content relevant to clinical practice 4	Content relevant to clinical practice 5 = Excellent
Download time	Download time Poor = 1	Download time 2	Download time 3	Download time 4	Download time 5 = Excellent
Layout/Visual appeal	Layout/Visual appeal Poor = 1	Layout/Visual appeal 2	Layout/Visual appeal 3	Layout/Visual appeal 4	Layout/Visual appeal 5 = Excellent
Proper categorization of content	Proper categorization of content Poor = 1	Proper categorization of content 2	Proper categorization of content 3	Proper categorization of content 4	Proper categorization of content 5 = Excellent
Number of ads	Number of ads Poor = 1	Number of ads 2	Number of ads 3	Number of ads 4	Number of ads 5 = Excellent
Search/Archiving feature	Search/Archiving feature Poor = 1	Search/Archiving feature 2	Search/Archiving feature 3	Search/Archiving feature 4	Search/Archiving feature 5 = Excellent

Question Title

* What can we do differently to enhance this resource and ensure you return often?

Question Title

* What topics or type of content would you like to see more of/less of?

More of

Less of

Question Title

* Thanks for your feedback! Would you like the Editor to contact you directly to discuss further? If so, please provide your name and preferred method of contact (email or phone):

Name

Email Address

Phone Number