Confidential Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Website Feedback

Please scroll down to complete your responses and click “Done” to finish:

Recently launched, MDedge.com/CCJM is a one-stop destination for the practical, timely medical news, evidence-based reviews, and clinically relevant digital content you trust from the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, including videos, podcasts, quizzes, and more. Your confidential input is welcomed so we can continue to meet your evolving professional needs.

Question Title

* Compared to your favorite, go to website, how satisfied are you with the features and format of the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine website?

Not at all satisfied

Not very satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Very satisfied

Extremely satisfied

Not at all satisfied

Not very satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Very satisfied

Extremely satisfied

Question Title

* What do you like/dislike about the site?

Dislike

Question Title

* To the best of your ability, please candidly rate the site, on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = poor and 5 = excellent, in terms of the following features.

	Poor = 1	2	3	4	5 = Excellent
Proper categorization of content	Proper categorization of content Poor = 1	Proper categorization of content 2	Proper categorization of content 3	Proper categorization of content 4	Proper categorization of content 5 = Excellent
Number of ads	Number of ads Poor = 1	Number of ads 2	Number of ads 3	Number of ads 4	Number of ads 5 = Excellent
Layout/Visual appeal	Layout/Visual appeal Poor = 1	Layout/Visual appeal 2	Layout/Visual appeal 3	Layout/Visual appeal 4	Layout/Visual appeal 5 = Excellent
Content relevant to clinical practice	Content relevant to clinical practice Poor = 1	Content relevant to clinical practice 2	Content relevant to clinical practice 3	Content relevant to clinical practice 4	Content relevant to clinical practice 5 = Excellent
Download time	Download time Poor = 1	Download time 2	Download time 3	Download time 4	Download time 5 = Excellent
Overall user experience/navigation	Overall user experience/navigation Poor = 1	Overall user experience/navigation 2	Overall user experience/navigation 3	Overall user experience/navigation 4	Overall user experience/navigation 5 = Excellent
Search/Archiving feature	Search/Archiving feature Poor = 1	Search/Archiving feature 2	Search/Archiving feature 3	Search/Archiving feature 4	Search/Archiving feature 5 = Excellent

Question Title

* What can we do differently to enhance this resource and ensure you return often?

Question Title

* What topics or type of content would you like to see more of/less of?

More of

Less of

Question Title

* Thanks for your feedback! Would you like the Editor to contact you directly to discuss further? If so, please provide your name and preferred method of contact (email or phone):

Name

Email Address

Phone Number