Skip to content
CLEVER open consultation 2026
1.
Name and surname
2.
Organisation
*
3.
Please select stakeholder group/s you belong to
(Required.)
Agricultural Producers, Agriculturists and Cultivators
Fuel Producers
Fuel Providers incl. Managers of Wastes and Residues for Feedstocks
Transport Service Providers and Operators
Fuelling / Charging Infrastructure Providers
Shippers & Passengers
Transport/Logistics Service Providers & Operators / Transport Planners
Technical Consultant
Research and Academics
Legislators and Policy Makers
Sector Associations & Federations
NGOs
Auditors & Assurance Sector & Certification Schemes
Life-Cycle Assessment and Emission Factor Specialists
Emission Calculation Tool Providers
Citizens/Society
Other (please specify)
*
4.
Data protection and consent note
Your data will be processed in accordance with CLEVER
Privacy Policy
, the GDPR 2016/679 and the Data Protection Act 2018.
You can request access, rectification, and deletion of your data at any time.
All data will be deleted by the end of the project on 31.06.2027.
Carolina Salas from PNO is the assigned CLEVER project Data Protection Officer (DPO) and thereby the data controller. She is located at C/ París 45-47, 08029 Barcelona, Spain and she can be contacted by e-mail at clever@emissionfactors.eu.
I agree to be publicly listed as open consultation respondent
(Required.)
Yes, with my name and organisation
Yes, but just mention my organisation
No, I want to be anonymous
5.
Chapter 3.1 Application
Application of the CLEVER framework was added and reflects also the latest updates regarding the CountEmissionsEU legislation. Do you agree with the proposed applications?
Yes
No
If no, what would you propose?
6.
Chapter 3.7. Data quality and Chapter 3.8 Sensitivity assessment
Handling of data quality was further simplified and an explanation of how data quality must be assessed for foreground data (using sensitivity analysis) and background data (using a data quality score) was added. Do you agree with the amended and simplified approach?
Yes
No
If not, what would you propose?
7.
Chapter 4.2 Life Cycle stages and System boundaries
Chapter 4.2 gives additional guidance regarding the system boundary for different fuel categories.
Are the different categories and their characteristics sufficiently described?
Yes
No
If not, what is missing?
8.
Chapter 4.5. Indirect land use change
The approach for the quantification of iLUC was further refined, and for aviation fuels the CORSIA iLUC factors are directly taken. For road and marine fuels iLUC factors stem from SBTi (which is itself based on amended iLUC factors from CORSIA).
Do you agree with this approach?
Yes
No
If not, what alternative source(s) would you suggest?
9.
Chapter 4.7 fuel and energy mixes
All energy mixes in CLEVER are modelled as location-based mixes aligning with ISO 14083 for location-based electricity.
Yes
No
I don't know
Do you agree with the chosen approach for handling grid-based and non-grid fuel mixes?
Yes
No
I don't know
If not, what would you change?
Do you agree with the proposed rules for behind-the-meter electricity and dedicated, renewable fuels?
Yes
No
I don't know
If not, what would you change?
10.
Chapter 4.9 Reporting requirements
Are the listed reporting requirements sufficient and did we include all important aspects?
Yes
No
If not, what should we add?
11.
Chapter 4.8 Operational emissions
Do you agree with the tiered approach for calculation of operational emissions in CLEVER?
Yes
No
If not, what would you change?
12.
Chapter 5.1 Verification and critical review
Do you agree with the approach chosen?
Yes
No
If not, what would you change?
13.
Chapter 5.2 Certification
Do you agree with the provision for conformity assessment and are the different use cases sufficiently clear?
Yes
No
If not, what do you recommend to change/ add?
14.
General questions (not directly linked to specific chapters)
Yes
No
I don't know
Are all scope elements sufficiently described as regards their methodological handling?
Yes
No
I don't know
If not, what would you change?
Are methodological decisions or choices transparent and clear?
Yes
No
I don't know
If not, what would you change?
Is the framework internally consistent and coherent?
Yes
No
I don't know
If not, what would you change?
15.
Do you want to add any additional comments or feedback?