Skip to content
Annual Medical Conference - Evaluation Form
Evaluation Form For Day 1: Friday January 27th, 2023
OK
1.
The Conference met my expectations.
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
2.
The content presented at the conference will benefit my overall approach to clinical practice.
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
3.
Was the conference length too long, too short or about right?
Too long
Too short
About right
4.
How would you rate the venue/location?
Exceeded expectations
Met expectations
Below expectations
5.
How would you rate the catering/food?
Above average
Average
Below average
6.
Speaker 1: Dr. Shandey Malcolm.
TOPIC: SITREP. The Epidemiological Burden of Chronic NCDs in The TCI.
Please answer the following questions.
Agree
Disagree
This speaker made a declaration of interests.
Agree
Disagree
This speaker's presentation met the educational objectives of the conference.
Agree
Disagree
This speaker's slide presentation was clear and readable and augmented the presentation well.
Agree
Disagree
This speaker's presentation style was engaging, and he/she/they were easy to understand.
Agree
Disagree
7.
Speaker 1: Dr. Samantha Avery
TOPIC:
Improving Patient Outcomes and Access Through Digital Health
Please answer the following questions.
Agree
Disagree
This speaker made a declaration of interests.
Agree
Disagree
This speaker's presentation met the educational objectives of the conference.
Agree
Disagree
This speaker's slide presentation was clear and readable and augmented the presentation well.
Agree
Disagree
This speaker's presentation style was engaging, and he/she/they were easy to understand.
Agree
Disagree
8.
Panelists 1: Dr. Vancelee Forbes
TOPIC:
Reducing NCDs Through Policy and Education. The Way Forward
Please answer the following questions.
Agree
Disagree
This panelist's contribution met the educational objectives of the conference.
Agree
Disagree
This panelist's presentation style was engaging, and he/she/they were easy to understand.
Agree
Disagree
This panelist addressed questions that were asked in a clear and adequate manner.
Agree
Disagree
9.
Panelists 1: Hon. Dr. Rufus Ewing
TOPIC:
Reducing NCDs Through Policy and Education. The Way Forward
Please answer the following questions.
Agree
Disagree
This panelist's contribution met the educational objectives of the conference.
Agree
Disagree
This panelist's presentation style was engaging, and he/she/they were easy to understand.
Agree
Disagree
This panelist addressed questions that were asked in a clear and adequate manner.
Agree
Disagree
10.
Panelists 1: Dr. Jeremy Myers
TOPIC:
Reducing NCDs Through Policy and Education. The Way Forward
Please answer the following questions.
Agree
Disagree
This panelist's contribution met the educational objectives of the conference.
Agree
Disagree
This panelist's presentation style was engaging, and he/she/they were easy to understand.
Agree
Disagree
This panelist addressed questions that were asked in a clear and adequate manner.
Agree
Disagree
11.
Which conference format do you prefer for future events?
In-Person
Virtual
Hybrid
12.
Overall, how would you rate the Conference?
Excellent
Very good
Good
Fair
Poor
13.
What was the single most valuable thing you learned at the conference?
14.
How likely are you to attend another medical conference again in the future?
Extremely likely
Very likely
Somewhat likely
Not so likely
Not at all likely
15.
Do you have any other comments, questions, or concerns?
Current Progress,
0 of 15 answered