Exit this survey

Managing Water in California Vineyards Symposium

Presenter Information & Speaker Evaluation

25% of survey complete.

Question Title

* 1. Please evaluate each speaker. (speakers listed alphabetically)

	Excellent	Good	Average	Fair	Poor
Larry Bettiga, University of California Cooperative Extension, Monterey County	Larry Bettiga, University of California Cooperative Extension, Monterey County Excellent	Larry Bettiga, University of California Cooperative Extension, Monterey County Good	Larry Bettiga, University of California Cooperative Extension, Monterey County Average	Larry Bettiga, University of California Cooperative Extension, Monterey County Fair	Larry Bettiga, University of California Cooperative Extension, Monterey County Poor
Andy Walker, (Moderator & Chair) University of California, Davis	Andy Walker, (Moderator & Chair) University of California, Davis Excellent	Andy Walker, (Moderator & Chair) University of California, Davis Good	Andy Walker, (Moderator & Chair) University of California, Davis Average	Andy Walker, (Moderator & Chair) University of California, Davis Fair	Andy Walker, (Moderator & Chair) University of California, Davis Poor
Jim Ayars, United States Department of Agriculture, Fresno	Jim Ayars, United States Department of Agriculture, Fresno Excellent	Jim Ayars, United States Department of Agriculture, Fresno Good	Jim Ayars, United States Department of Agriculture, Fresno Average	Jim Ayars, United States Department of Agriculture, Fresno Fair	Jim Ayars, United States Department of Agriculture, Fresno Poor
Mark Battany, University of California Cooperative Extension, San Luis Obispo County	Mark Battany, University of California Cooperative Extension, San Luis Obispo County Excellent	Mark Battany, University of California Cooperative Extension, San Luis Obispo County Good	Mark Battany, University of California Cooperative Extension, San Luis Obispo County Average	Mark Battany, University of California Cooperative Extension, San Luis Obispo County Fair	Mark Battany, University of California Cooperative Extension, San Luis Obispo County Poor
David Block, University of California, Davis	David Block, University of California, Davis Excellent	David Block, University of California, Davis Good	David Block, University of California, Davis Average	David Block, University of California, Davis Fair	David Block, University of California, Davis Poor
Simone Castellarin, Wine Research Center, Canada	Simone Castellarin, Wine Research Center, Canada Excellent	Simone Castellarin, Wine Research Center, Canada Good	Simone Castellarin, Wine Research Center, Canada Average	Simone Castellarin, Wine Research Center, Canada Fair	Simone Castellarin, Wine Research Center, Canada Poor
Markus Keller, Washington State University, Prosser	Markus Keller, Washington State University, Prosser Excellent	Markus Keller, Washington State University, Prosser Good	Markus Keller, Washington State University, Prosser Average	Markus Keller, Washington State University, Prosser Fair	Markus Keller, Washington State University, Prosser Poor
Jay Lund, University of California, Davis	Jay Lund, University of California, Davis Excellent	Jay Lund, University of California, Davis Good	Jay Lund, University of California, Davis Average	Jay Lund, University of California, Davis Fair	Jay Lund, University of California, Davis Poor
Mike McCarthy, South Australian Research & Development Institute, Australia	Mike McCarthy, South Australian Research & Development Institute, Australia Excellent	Mike McCarthy, South Australian Research & Development Institute, Australia Good	Mike McCarthy, South Australian Research & Development Institute, Australia Average	Mike McCarthy, South Australian Research & Development Institute, Australia Fair	Mike McCarthy, South Australian Research & Development Institute, Australia Poor
Andrew McElrone, (Moderator) University of California, Davis	Andrew McElrone, (Moderator) University of California, Davis Excellent	Andrew McElrone, (Moderator) University of California, Davis Good	Andrew McElrone, (Moderator) University of California, Davis Average	Andrew McElrone, (Moderator) University of California, Davis Fair	Andrew McElrone, (Moderator) University of California, Davis Poor
Lars Pierce, California State University, Monterey Bay	Lars Pierce, California State University, Monterey Bay Excellent	Lars Pierce, California State University, Monterey Bay Good	Lars Pierce, California State University, Monterey Bay Average	Lars Pierce, California State University, Monterey Bay Fair	Lars Pierce, California State University, Monterey Bay Poor
Luis Sanchez, E & J Gallo, California	Luis Sanchez, E & J Gallo, California Excellent	Luis Sanchez, E & J Gallo, California Good	Luis Sanchez, E & J Gallo, California Average	Luis Sanchez, E & J Gallo, California Fair	Luis Sanchez, E & J Gallo, California Poor
Rick Snyder, University of California, Davis	Rick Snyder, University of California, Davis Excellent	Rick Snyder, University of California, Davis Good	Rick Snyder, University of California, Davis Average	Rick Snyder, University of California, Davis Fair	Rick Snyder, University of California, Davis Poor
Shrini K. Upadhyaya, University of California, Davis	Shrini K. Upadhyaya, University of California, Davis Excellent	Shrini K. Upadhyaya, University of California, Davis Good	Shrini K. Upadhyaya, University of California, Davis Average	Shrini K. Upadhyaya, University of California, Davis Fair	Shrini K. Upadhyaya, University of California, Davis Poor
Larry Williams, University of California, Davis	Larry Williams, University of California, Davis Excellent	Larry Williams, University of California, Davis Good	Larry Williams, University of California, Davis Average	Larry Williams, University of California, Davis Fair	Larry Williams, University of California, Davis Poor

Question Title

* 2. Please rate the following presenter information.

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Presenters were well prepared and organized.	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Strongly Agree	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Agree	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Neutral	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Disagree	Presenters were well prepared and organized. Strongly Disagree
Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter.	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Strongly Agree	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Agree	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Neutral	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Disagree	Presenters were knowledgeable about subject matter. Strongly Disagree
Presenters’ style was clear and effective.	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Strongly Agree	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Agree	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Neutral	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Disagree	Presenters’ style was clear and effective. Strongly Disagree
Presenters stimulated interest and discussion.	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Strongly Agree	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Agree	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Neutral	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Disagree	Presenters stimulated interest and discussion. Strongly Disagree
Presenters were responsive to participants.	Presenters were responsive to participants. Strongly Agree	Presenters were responsive to participants. Agree	Presenters were responsive to participants. Neutral	Presenters were responsive to participants. Disagree	Presenters were responsive to participants. Strongly Disagree
Visual aids were useful and appropriate.	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Strongly Agree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Agree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Neutral	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Disagree	Visual aids were useful and appropriate. Strongly Disagree