Skip to content
CJA Symposium: Just Published a Paper. Then Got Sued. A Past Editor’s Perspective on Existential Threat to Academic Research and Scholarly Debate
Learning Objectives:
After attending this session, participants will be able to:
Review notable articles published in the last year.
Discuss implications for practice and limitations.
1.
Overall Session Evaluation
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The objectives were clearly stated
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The stated objectives were met
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
I acquired new skills and/or knowledge
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
I was introduced to new perspectives on my current practice
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The content was relevant to my learning needs
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
This session promoted interaction (i.e., Q&A, polling etc.)
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
2.
This session encouraged me to consider changes to my practice
Yes, please specify which in the comments box below
No - I do not see the need to make changes
No - I do not have the required resources to implement these changes
No - I am thinking about changes and have the necessary resources, but am not ready to make them yet
No - I am already implementing recommended practices
No - The information was not relevant to me
Comments
3.
Which CanMEDS roles were addressed?
Medical Expert
Communicator
Collaborator
Leader
Health advocate
Scholar
Professional
4.
Moderator: Dr Stephan Schwarz
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The moderator was organized and managed the session well
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Please let us know what the moderator did well or what could be improved for future sessions
5.
Moderator: Dr Philip M. Jones
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The moderator was organized and managed the session well
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Please let us know what the moderator did well or what could be improved for future sessions
6.
Speaker: Dr Evan Kharasch
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Communicated clearly and effectively
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Was knowledgeable about this topic
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Used clear audiovisual aids, which enhanced the presentation
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
I would attend another presentation by this speaker in the future
Strongly Agree
Agree
Somewhat Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
7.
Overall, how would you rate the quality and effectiveness of the speaker's presentation with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent?
0
5
10
Clear
8.
The session and presenter(s) were balanced and free from commercial bias
Yes
No, please indicate why
9.
Please provide any additional comments or suggestions regarding this session, moderator(s), and speaker(s).
Thank you for completing the evaluation!
